IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v54y2008i6p550-561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Central and Connected Am I in my Family? Bridging and Bonding Social Capital in Family Configurations of Young Adults With Psychiatric Disorders

Author

Listed:
  • E.D. Widmer

    (Department of Sociology, University of Geneva, Switzerland, Eric.widmer@unige.ch)

  • A. Orita

    (Département de Psychiatrie Adulte (DUPA), Hôpital Cantonal Vaudois, Lausanne)

  • J.-A. Gauthier

    (Centre Pavie, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne)

  • N. Sénac
  • A.T. Cucchia
  • K. Stekel
  • F. Grasset

    (Institut de Psychologie, Quartier UNIL-Dorigny, Lausanne)

Abstract

Aims: This article explores the structures of relational resources that individuals with psychiatric disorders get from their family configurations using the concept of social capital. Methods: The research is based on a sample of 54 individuals with psychiatric disorders and behavioural problems, and a comparison sample of 54 individuals without a clinical record matched to the clinical respondents for age and sex. Standard measures of social capital from social network methods are applied on family configurations of individuals from both samples. Differences are tested by variance analysis. Results: Structures of family resources available to individuals with psychiatric disorders are distinct. Individuals with psychiatric disorders perceive themselves as less central in their family configurations and less connected to their family members. Their significant family members are perceived as less connected with each other. As a whole, their family configurations are smaller and do not include spouses or partners. Therefore bridging and bonding social capitals are not readily available for them. Conclusion: As family configurations of individuals with psychiatric disorders provide fewer relational resources than other families, they are not able to deal with social integration of individuals with psychiatric disorders on their own.

Suggested Citation

  • E.D. Widmer & A. Orita & J.-A. Gauthier & N. Sénac & A.T. Cucchia & K. Stekel & F. Grasset, 2008. "How Central and Connected Am I in my Family? Bridging and Bonding Social Capital in Family Configurations of Young Adults With Psychiatric Disorders," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 54(6), pages 550-561, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:54:y:2008:i:6:p:550-561
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764008091437
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764008091437
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764008091437?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pescosolido, Bernice A. & Wright, Eric R., 2004. "The view from two worlds: The convergence of social network reports between mental health clients and their ties," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(9), pages 1795-1806, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pescosolido Bernice, 2011. "Social Connectedness in Health, Morbidity and Mortality, and Health Care - The Contributions, Limits and Further Potential of Health and Retirement Study," Forum for Health Economics & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Elizabeth Golembiewski & Dennis P. Watson & Lisa Robison & John W. Coberg II, 2017. "Social Network Decay as Potential Recovery from Homelessness: A Mixed Methods Study in Housing First Programming," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16, August.
    3. Wyke, Sally & Adamson, Joy & Dixon, Diane & Hunt, Kate, 2013. "Consultation and illness behaviour in response to symptoms: A comparison of models from different disciplinary frameworks and suggestions for future research directions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 79-87.
    4. Jones, Ian Rees & Ahmed, Nilufar & Catty, Jocelyn & McLaren, Susan & Rose, Diana & Wykes, Til & Burns, Tom, 2009. "Illness careers and continuity of care in mental health services: A qualitative study of service users and carers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(4), pages 632-639, August.
    5. Mueller, Brigitte & Nordt, Carlos & Lauber, Christoph & Rueesch, Peter & Meyer, Peter C. & Roessler, Wulf, 2006. "Social support modifies perceived stigmatization in the first years of mental illness: A longitudinal approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 39-49, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:54:y:2008:i:6:p:550-561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.