IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/socpsy/v51y2005i1p23-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Services and Health Services Day Care in Mental Health: The Social Networks and Care Needs of their Users

Author

Listed:
  • Jocelyn Catty

    (Department of Mental Health, Jenner Wing, St George’s Hospital Medical School, London, UK, jcatty@sghms.ac.uk)

  • Kim Goddard

    (South West London and St. George’s Mental Health NHS Trust, Springfield University Hospital, London, UK, kgoddard@swlstg-tr.nhs.uk)

  • Tom Burns

    (Department of Psychiatry, Oxford University, Oxford, UK, tom.burns@psychiatry.oxford.ac.uk)

Abstract

Background: In view of the increasing integration of health and social care, there is an urgent need to know how health service day hospitals and social service day centres are being used, and by whom. Aims: We aimed to compare users of day hospitals and centres in terms of their social networks, needs for care and demographics. Methods: A cross-sectional, comparative study of service users at two day hospitals and four day centres compared their social networks, needs and characteristics. Results: Day centre clients had much larger social networks, including a threefold difference in total contacts and two-fold difference in confidants, but had more needs for care, particularly relating to psychological distress. They were also older on average than day hospital patients and were a more long-term group. Conclusion: It is vital to understand differences between health service day hospitals and social service day centres given the increasing integration of health and social care. The present study shows that the two user groups are significantly different. It is unlikely that the needs of most day care users could be met by either service interchangeably.

Suggested Citation

  • Jocelyn Catty & Kim Goddard & Tom Burns, 2005. "Social Services and Health Services Day Care in Mental Health: The Social Networks and Care Needs of their Users," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 51(1), pages 23-34, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:51:y:2005:i:1:p:23-34
    DOI: 10.1177/0020764005053267
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764005053267
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0020764005053267?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jocelyn Catty & Kim Goddard & Tom Burns, 2005. "Social Services Day Care and Health Services Day Care in Mental Health: Do they Differ?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 51(2), pages 151-161, June.
    2. Nelson, Geoffrey & Hall, G. Brent & Squire, Denise & Walsh-Bowers, Richard T., 1992. "Social network transactions of psychiatric patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 433-445, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anita Bengtsson-Tops & Lars Hansson, 2001. "Quantitative and Qualitative Aspects of the Social Network in Schizophrenic Patients Living in the Community. Relationship To Sociodemographic Characteristics and Clinical Factors and Subjective Quali," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 47(3), pages 67-77, September.
    2. Mona Eklund & Lars Hansson, 2007. "Social Network Among People With Persistent Mental Illness: Associations With Sociodemographic, Clinical and Health-Related Factors," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 53(4), pages 293-305, July.
    3. Elisabeth Argentzell & Christel Leufstadius & Mona Eklund, 2014. "Social interaction among people with psychiatric disabilities – Does attending a day centre matter?," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 60(6), pages 519-527, September.
    4. Peter Tyrer & Agne Balod & Arunas Germanavicius & Andrew McDonald & Mythili Varadan & Jacqui Thomas, 2007. "Perceptions of Assertive Community Treatment in the UK and Lithuania," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 53(6), pages 498-506, November.
    5. François Wyngaerden & Marie Tempels & Jean-Louis Feys & Vincent Dubois & Vincent Lorant, 2020. "The personal social network of psychiatric service users," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 66(7), pages 682-692, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:51:y:2005:i:1:p:23-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.