IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/soasur/v21y2014i1-2p151-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Asian Involvement in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Shaji S

Abstract

The refashioned economies and polities of countries, notably in the Global South after the end of the Cold War, drastically altered the perceptions on binaries of conventional types at the international level—South/North, East/West, core/periphery and so on. Asian powers, such as, India and China, under the rapidly expanding processes of globalisation began to intensively involve in the developing world, notably in Africa, which was hitherto overlooked, in search of oil and natural resources, along with accessing their fledging markets. The criticisms generated on the Asian involvement in Africa, notably on the part of African scholars/observers, prompt us to revisit some of the established conceptions on North–South, South/South relations, critiquing the very essence of the ‘Global South’ in the contemporary period. In addition, economic ties/practices between Asian powers (such as, India and China) and African states, while blurring the old binaries, have the potential to create new binaries in the near future.

Suggested Citation

  • Shaji S, 2014. "Asian Involvement in Africa," South Asian Survey, , vol. 21(1-2), pages 151-163, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:soasur:v:21:y:2014:i:1-2:p:151-163
    DOI: 10.1177/0971523115592519
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0971523115592519
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0971523115592519?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gore, Charles, 2000. "The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 789-804, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Adenle, Ademola A. & Ford, James D. & Morton, John & Twomlow, Stephen & Alverson, Keith & Cattaneo, Andrea & Cervigni, Rafaello & Kurukulasuriya, Pradeep & Huq, Saleemul & Helfgott, Ariella & Ebinger,, 2017. "Managing Climate Change Risks in Africa - A Global Perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 190-201.
    2. Kanyam, Daniel A. & Kostandini, Genti & Ferreira, Susana, 2017. "The Mobile Phone Revolution: Have Mobile Phones and the Internet Reduced Corruption in Sub-Saharan Africa?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 271-284.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meagher, Kate, 2015. "Leaving no-one behind? Informal economies, economic inclusion, and Islamic extremism in Nigeria," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62140, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/5a5m6mrpgl8dlbhfjigc98ug8o is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Erlend Krogstad, 2007. "The Post-Washington Consensus: Brand New Agenda or Old Wine in a New Bottle?," Challenge, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(2), pages 67-85.
    4. Luiza Kostecka-Tomaszewska & Monika Krukowska, 2021. "China's Economic Statecraft: The Role of the Belt and Road Initiative," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 1019-1036.
    5. Michal Lyons & Colman Titus Msoka, 2010. "The World Bank and the Street: (How) Do ‘Doing Business’ Reforms Affect Tanzania’s Micro-traders?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(5), pages 1079-1097, May.
    6. Michael Tribe & Andrew Sumner, 2006. "Development economics at a crossroads? Introduction to a policy arena," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(7), pages 957-966.
    7. Jairo Guillermo Isaza Castro & Carlos Arturo Meza Carvajalino, 2004. "La demanda de trabajo:Aspectos teóricos y evidencia empírica para Colombia," Serie de Documentos en Economía y Violencia 2965, Centro de Investigaciones en Violencia, Instituciones y Desarrollo Económico (VIDE).
    8. R. Jerome Anderson, 2006. "Industrial firm linkages in a post-Soviet urban economy: implications for development policy and programmes," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 6(3), pages 224-241, July.
    9. Gasper, D.R., 2001. "Global ethics and global strangers : beyond the inter-national relations framework : an essay in descriptive ethics," ISS Working Papers - General Series 19086, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    10. Francesco Saraceno, 2016. "The ECB: a reluctant leading character of the EMU play," Economia Politica: Journal of Analytical and Institutional Economics, Springer;Fondazione Edison, vol. 33(2), pages 129-151, August.
    11. Mockshell, Jonathan & Birner, Regina, 2015. "Donors and domestic policy makers: Two worlds in agricultural policy-making?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1-14.
    12. Ziya Önis & Fikret Senses, 2003. "Rethinking the Emerging Post-Washington Consensus: A Critical Appraisal," ERC Working Papers 0309, ERC - Economic Research Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Sep 2003.
    13. Varga, Mihai, 2022. "Getting the “basics”? The World Bank’s narrative construction of poverty reduction in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    14. Marion Fourcade, 2013. "The material and symbolic construction of the BRICs," Post-Print hal-03473894, HAL.
    15. Mark Purcell & J. Christopher Brown, 2005. "Against the local trap: scale and the study of environment and development," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 5(4), pages 279-297, October.
    16. Sanja Franc & Antea Barišić & Zoran Wittine, 2020. "The Dilemma over Washington Consensus Guidelines or Industrial Policy: Lessons from Croatia," Notitia - journal for economic, business and social issues, Notitia Ltd., vol. 1(6), pages 49-62, December.
    17. Paul Mosley, 2004. "Institutions And Politics In A Lewis‐Type Growth Model," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 72(6), pages 751-773, December.
    18. Eric Berr & François Combarnous & Eric Rougier, 2005. "Too much consensus could be harmful : measuring the degree of implementation of the Washington consensus and its impact on economic growth," Documents de travail 116, Groupe d'Economie du Développement de l'Université Montesquieu Bordeaux IV.
    19. Daniela Gabor, 2021. "The Wall Street Consensus," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 52(3), pages 429-459, May.
    20. Gheorghe Florin MISCEAC, 2015. "European Development Assistance Policy: A Diachronic Approach," Management Intercultural, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 33, pages 105-110, April.
    21. Marangos, John, 2009. "What happened to the Washington Consensus? The evolution of international development policy," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 197-208, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:soasur:v:21:y:2014:i:1-2:p:151-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.