IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v8y2018i2p2158244018780946.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who Reads Science Fiction and Fantasy, and How Do They Feel About Science? Preliminary Findings From an Online Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Benjamin Menadue
  • Susan Jacups

Abstract

This article describes findings from an online survey Science Fiction & Fantasy: Your Experiences , launched in November 2015 and closed 1 year later, which received 909 unique responses. The survey identified characteristics of readers of science fiction, their knowledge and experiences of works, authors, and subgenres. It examined their attitudes to science and science fiction and their judgment of the similarity between real and fictional scientists. Contrary to declining reading habits, the science fiction and fantasy audience read consistently high volumes of books, as well as watching genre TV and film. We discovered that reading science fiction and fantasy may have a role in sustained, and cognitively beneficial, adoption of reading by young people and is complementary to other forms of consumption, rather than competitive. Science fiction was also found to be an important influence on the perception and acceptance of science by the public. Implications of this are that science fiction and fantasy are now a normal part of life for a wide range of people, and science fiction has a positive influence on popular interpretation, acceptance, and support of scientific endeavors. These results support earlier work that suggests science fiction is a valuable research tool for public engagement with science.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Benjamin Menadue & Susan Jacups, 2018. "Who Reads Science Fiction and Fantasy, and How Do They Feel About Science? Preliminary Findings From an Online Survey," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(2), pages 21582440187, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:8:y:2018:i:2:p:2158244018780946
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244018780946
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244018780946
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244018780946?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Benjamin Menadue, 2018. "Hubbard Bubble, Dianetics Trouble: An Evaluation of the Representations of Dianetics and Scientology in Science Fiction Magazines From 1949 to 1999," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, October.
    2. Christopher Benjamin Menadue & Karen Diane Cheer, 2017. "Human Culture and Science Fiction: A Review of the Literature, 1980-2016," SAGE Open, , vol. 7(3), pages 21582440177, August.
    3. Martine Selm & Nicholas Jankowski, 2006. "Conducting Online Surveys," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 40(3), pages 435-456, June.
    4. Sonia Livingstone, 2013. "The participation paradigm in audience research," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 49630, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christopher Benjamin Menadue & Kristi Giselsson & David Guez, 2020. "An Empirical Revision of the Definition of Science Fiction: It Is All in the Techne . . ," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    2. Muscio, Alessandro, 2023. "The ambiguous role of science and technology in Marvel superhero comics: From their ‘Golden Age’ to the present-day," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 186(PB).
    3. Christopher Benjamin Menadue, 2018. "Hubbard Bubble, Dianetics Trouble: An Evaluation of the Representations of Dianetics and Scientology in Science Fiction Magazines From 1949 to 1999," SAGE Open, , vol. 8(4), pages 21582440188, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher Benjamin Menadue & Kristi Giselsson & David Guez, 2020. "An Empirical Revision of the Definition of Science Fiction: It Is All in the Techne . . ," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, October.
    2. Morenike Oluwatoyin Folayan & Roberto Ariel Abeldaño Zuniga & Oliver C. Ezechi & Brandon Brown & Annie L. Nguyen & Nourhan M. Aly & Passent Ellakany & Ifeoma E. Idigbe & Abeedha Tu-Allah Khan & Folake, 2022. "Associations between Emotional Distress, Sleep Changes, Decreased Tooth Brushing Frequency, Self-Reported Oral Ulcers and SARS-Cov-2 Infection during the First Wave of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Global ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-11, September.
    3. Shannon Davis & Andrey Shevchuk & Denis Strebkov, 2014. "Pathways to Satisfaction with Work-Life Balance: The Case of Russian-Language Internet Freelancers," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 542-556, December.
    4. Vicente Gea-Caballero & José Ramón Martínez-Riera & Pedro García-Martínez & Jorge Casaña-Mohedo & Isabel Antón-Solanas & María Virtudes Verdeguer-Gómez & Iván Santolaya-Arnedo & Raúl Juárez-Vela, 2021. "Study of the Strengths and Weaknesses of Nursing Work Environments in Primary Care in Spain," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-12, January.
    5. Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Opazo-Basaez, Marco, 2021. "Information technologies and product-service innovation: The moderating role of service R&D team structure," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 673-687.
    6. van der Graaf, Shenja & Ballon, Pieter, 2019. "Navigating platform urbanism," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 364-372.
    7. Andrea Serge & Johana Quiroz Montoya & Francisco Alonso & Luis Montoro, 2021. "Socioeconomic Status, Health and Lifestyle Settings as Psychosocial Risk Factors for Road Crashes in Young People: Assessing the Colombian Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-22, January.
    8. Ahmed Hassan Abdou & Majed Abdulaziz Al Abdulathim & Nadia Rebhi Hussni Hasan & Maha Hassan Ahmed Salah & Howayda Said Ahmed Mohamed Ali & Nancy J. Kamel, 2023. "From Green Inclusive Leadership to Green Organizational Citizenship: Exploring the Mediating Role of Green Work Engagement and Green Organizational Identification in the Hotel Industry Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-22, October.
    9. Konstantinos Nikolaos Vasileiadis & Konstantinos Alexandros Tsioumis & Argyris Kyridis, 2013. "The Effects of Dominant Ideology on Teachers¡¯ Perceptions and Practices towards the ¡°Other¡±," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(1), pages 33-48, December.
    10. Lara Fontanella & Paola Villano & Marika Di Donato, 2016. "Attitudes towards Roma people and migrants: a comparison through a Bayesian multidimensional IRT model," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 471-490, March.
    11. König Pascal D., 2020. "Why Digital-Era Political Marketing is Not the Death Knell for Democracy: On the Importance of Placing Political Microtargeting in the Context of Party Competition," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 11(1), pages 87-110, June.
    12. Vendrell-Herrero, Ferran & Gomes, Emanuel & Bustinza, Oscar F. & Mellahi, Kamel, 2018. "Uncovering the role of cross-border strategic alliances and expertise decision centralization in enhancing product-service innovation in MMNEs," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(4), pages 814-825.
    13. Ioan-Sebastian Brumă & Cristina Cautisanu & Lucian Tanasă & Simona-Roxana Ulman & Meda Gâlea & Alexandra Raluca Jelea, 2024. "Does the payment method matter in online shopping behaviour? Study on the Romanian market of vegetables during the pandemic crisis," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(1), pages 34-47.
    14. Evelyn Schapansky & Joke Depraetere & Ines Keygnaert & Christophe Vandeviver, 2021. "Prevalence and Associated Factors of Sexual Victimization: Findings from a National Representative Sample of Belgian Adults Aged 16–69," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-22, July.
    15. Martin Loidl & Christian Werner & Laura Heym & Patrick Kofler & Günther Innerebner, 2019. "Lifestyles and Cycling Behavior—Data from a Cross-Sectional Study," Data, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-19, October.
    16. Lara Fontanella & Mara Maretti & Annalina Sarra, 2014. "Gender fluidity across the world: a Multilevel Item Response Theory approach," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 48(5), pages 2553-2568, September.
    17. Magdy Sayed Ahmed Abolnasser & Ahmed Hassan Abdou & Thowayeb H. Hassan & Amany E. Salem, 2023. "Transformational Leadership, Employee Engagement, Job Satisfaction, and Psychological Well-Being among Hotel Employees after the Height of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Serial Mediation Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-27, February.
    18. Martin P. Fritze & Andreas B. Eisingerich & Martin Benkenstein, 2019. "Digital transformation and possession attachment: examining the endowment effect for consumers’ relationships with hedonic and utilitarian digital service technologies," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 311-337, June.
    19. Alyavina, Elena & Nikitas, Alexandros & Njoya, Eric Tchouamou, 2024. "Mobility-as-a-Service and unsustainable travel behaviour: Exploring the car ownership and public transport trip replacement side-effects of the MaaS paradigm," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 53-70.
    20. Bart Cammaerts, 2015. "Neoliberalism and the post-hegemonic war of position: the dialectic between invisibility and visibilities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 64480, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:8:y:2018:i:2:p:2158244018780946. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.