Public Engagement in Prioritizing Research Proposals
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1177/2158244014523791
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Viner, Neil & Powell, Philip & Green, Rod, 2004. "Institutionalized biases in the award of research grants: a preliminary analysis revisiting the principle of accumulative advantage," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(3), pages 443-454, April.
- Fiona Murray & Leigh Graham, 2007. "Buying science and selling science: gender differences in the market for commercial science," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 16(4), pages 657-689, August.
- A. Russell & Frank Vanclay & Janet Salisbury & Heather Aslin, 2011. "Technology assessment in Australia: the case for a formal agency to improve advice to policy makers," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 44(2), pages 157-177, June.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Hunt, Jennifer & Garant, Jean-Philippe & Herman, Hannah & Munroe, David J., 2012.
"Why Don't Women Patent?,"
IZA Discussion Papers
6886, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Hunt, Jennifer & Garant, Jean-Philippe & Herman, Hannah & Munroe, David, 2012. "Why Don't Women Patent?," CEPR Discussion Papers 9185, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Jennifer Hunt & Jean-Philippe Garant & Hannah Herman & David J. Munroe, 2012. "Why Don't Women Patent?," NBER Working Papers 17888, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Albert Banal-Estañol & Qianshuo Liu & Inés Macho-Stadler & David Pérez-Castrillo, 2021.
"Similar-to-me Effects in the Grant Application Process: Applicants, Panelists, and the Likelihood of Obtaining Funds,"
Working Papers
1289, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Albert Banal-Estañol & Qianshuo Liu & Inés Macho-Stadler & Pérez-Castrillo, 2021. "Similar-to-me effects in the grant application process: Applicants, panelists, and the likelihood of obtaining funds," Economics Working Papers 1801, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
- Simen G. Enger & Fulvio Castellacci, 2016.
"Who gets Horizon 2020 research grants? Propensity to apply and probability to succeed in a two-step analysis,"
Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 109(3), pages 1611-1638, December.
- Simen G. Enger & Fulvio Castellacci, 2016. "Who gets Horizon 2020 research grants? Propensity to apply and probability to succeed in a two-step analysis," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20160225, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
- Julian Kolev & Yuly Fuentes-Medel & Fiona Murray, 2019. "Is Blinded Review Enough? How Gendered Outcomes Arise Even Under Anonymous Evaluation," NBER Working Papers 25759, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Day, Theodore Eugene, 2015. "The big consequences of small biases: A simulation of peer review," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(6), pages 1266-1270.
- Ding, Waverly & Choi, Emily, 2008. "Divergent Paths or Stepping Stones: A Comparison of Scientists’ Advising and Founding Activities," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt4907j25p, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
- Marco Cozzi, 2020.
"Public Funding of Research and Grant Proposals in the Social Sciences: Empirical Evidence from Canada,"
Department Discussion Papers
1809, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
- Marco Cozzi, 2022. "Public Funding of Research and Grant Proposals in the Social Sciences: Empirical Evidence from Canada," Department Discussion Papers 2009, Department of Economics, University of Victoria.
- Munari, Federico & Toschi, Laura, 2021. "The impact of public funding on science valorisation: an analysis of the ERC Proof-of-Concept Programme," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(6).
- Banal-Estañol, Albert & Macho-Stadler, Inés & Pérez-Castrillo, David, 2019.
"Evaluation in research funding agencies: Are structurally diverse teams biased against?,"
Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(7), pages 1823-1840.
- Albert Banal-Estañol & Inés Macho-Stadler & David Pérez-Castrillo, 2016. "Evaluation in Research Funding Agencies: Are Structurally Diverse Teams Biased Against?," Working Papers 890, Barcelona School of Economics.
- Edoardo Ferrucci & Francesco Lissoni & Ernest Miguelez, 2020.
"Coming from afar and picking a man’s job:Women immigrant inventors in the United States,"
Working Papers
hal-03098102, HAL.
- Edoardo FERRUCCI & Francesco LISSONI & Ernest MIGUELEZ, 2020. "Coming from afar and picking a man’s job:Women immigrant inventors in the United States," Bordeaux Economics Working Papers 2020-01, Bordeaux School of Economics (BSE).
- Chiara Franzoni & Paula Stephan & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2022.
"Funding Risky Research,"
Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 1(1), pages 103-133.
- Chiara Franzoni & Paula Stephan & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2021. "Funding Risky Research," NBER Chapters, in: Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, volume 1, pages 103-133, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Chiara Franzoni & Paula Stephan & Reinhilde Veugelers, 2021. "Funding Risky Research," NBER Working Papers 28905, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Seeber, Marco & Alon, Ilan & Pina, David G. & Piro, Fredrik Niclas & Seeber, Michele, 2022. "Predictors of applying for and winning an ERC Proof-of-Concept grant: An automated machine learning model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
- Lawson, Cornelia & Salter, Ammon, 2023. "Exploring the effect of overlapping institutional applications on panel decision-making," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
- Benjamin Clark, 2011. "Influences and conflicts of federal policies in academic–industrial scientific collaboration," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 36(5), pages 514-545, October.
- Oscar Llopis & Mabel Sánchez-Barrioluengo & Julia Olmos-Peñuela & Elena Castro-Martínez, 2018.
"Scientists’ engagement in knowledge transfer and exchange: Individual factors, variety of mechanisms and users,"
Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 45(6), pages 790-803.
- Elena Castro-Martinez & Óscar Llopis & Mabel Sánchez Barrioluengo & Julia Olmos-Peñuela, 2018. "Scientists’ engagement in knowledge transfer and exchange: individual factors, variety of mechanisms and users," Post-Print hal-02062208, HAL.
- Lissoni, Francesco & Montobbio, Fabio & Zirulia, Lorenzo, 2013.
"Inventorship and authorship as attribution rights: An enquiry into the economics of scientific credit,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 49-69.
- Lissoni, Francesco & Fabio, Montobbio, 2012. "Inventorship and authorship as attribution rights: An enquiry into the economics of scientific credit," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201221, University of Turin.
- Francesco Lissoni & Fabio Montobbio & Lorenzo Zirulia, 2013. "Inventorship and authorship as attribution rights: An enquiry into the economics of scientific credit," Post-Print hal-01135254, HAL.
- Simen G. Enger, 2017. "Closed clubs: Cumulative advantages and participation in Horizon 2020," Working Papers on Innovation Studies 20170703, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo.
- Albert Banal-Estañol & Ines Macho-Stadler & David Pérez-Castrillo, 2016.
"Key Success Drivers in Public Research Grants: Funding the Seeds of Radical Innovation in Academia?,"
CESifo Working Paper Series
5852, CESifo.
- Albert Banal-Estañol & Inés Macho-Stadler & David Pérez-Castrillo, 2016. "Key success drivers in public research grants: Funding the seeds of radical innovation in academia?," Economics Working Papers 1518, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
- Meng, Yu, 2016. "Collaboration patterns and patenting: Exploring gender distinctions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 56-67.
- Dirk Dohse & Rajeev K. Goel & Devrim Göktepe‐Hultén, 2021.
"Paths academic scientists take to entrepreneurship: Disaggregating direct and indirect influences,"
Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1740-1753, October.
- Dohse, Dirk & Goel, Rajeev K. & Göktepe‐Hultén, Devrim, 2021. "Paths academic scientists take to entrepreneurship: Disaggregating direct and indirect influences," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 241999, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
More about this item
Keywords
public participation; deliberative; engagement; decision-making; science; policy; funding; allocations; agricultural science; Australia;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:2158244014523791. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.