IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v4y2014i1p2158244014521433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Belief in Magic in the Age of Science

Author

Listed:
  • Eugene Subbotsky

Abstract

The widely spread view on magical beliefs in modern industrial cultures contends that magical beliefs are a bunch of curious phenomena that persist today as an unnecessary addition to a much more important set of rational beliefs. Contrary to this view, in this article, the view is presented, which suggests that the belief in magic is a fundamental property of the human mind. Individuals can consciously consider themselves to be completely rational people and deny that they believe in magic or God despite harboring a subconscious belief in the supernatural. Research also shows how engagement in magical thinking can enhance cognitive functioning, such as creative thinking, perception and memory. Moreover, this article suggests that certain forms of social compliance and obedience to authority historically evolved from magical practices of mind control and are still powered by the implicit belief in magic. Finally, the article outlines areas of life, such as education, religion, political influence, commerce, military and political terror, and entertainment, in which magical thinking and beliefs of modern people can find practical applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Eugene Subbotsky, 2014. "The Belief in Magic in the Age of Science," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(1), pages 21582440145, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:2158244014521433
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244014521433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244014521433
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244014521433?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Scott Atran & Robert Axelrod & Richard Davis, 2007. "Sacred barriers to conflict resolution," Post-Print ijn_00505181, HAL.
    2. Scott Atran, 2003. "Genesis of Suicide Terrorm (supporting online material)," Post-Print ijn_00000344, HAL.
    3. repec:cup:judgdm:v:4:y:2009:i:4:p:273-279 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sonya Sachdeva & Rumen Iliev & Hamed Ekhtiari & Morteza Dehghani, 2015. "The Role of Self-Sacrifice in Moral Dilemmas," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-12, June.
    2. John H Shaver & Chris G Sibley & Danny Osborne & Joseph Bulbulia, 2017. "News exposure predicts anti-Muslim prejudice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-19, March.
    3. Nicolò Bellanca & Stefani Innocenti, 2013. "Not-dividing the Indivisible: Formation of the Sacred and Antagonistic Conflicts," Working Papers - Economics wp2013_10.rdf, Universita' degli Studi di Firenze, Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Economia e l'Impresa.
    4. Chen, Daniel L., 2016. "Priming Ideology: Why Presidential Elections Affect U.S. Judges," TSE Working Papers 16-681, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Aug 2016.
    5. Vicente, Pedro C. & Vilela, Inês, 2022. "Preventing Islamic radicalization: Experimental evidence on anti-social behavior," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 474-485.
    6. Tareq Sadeq & Michel Lubrano, 2018. "The Wall’s Impact in the Occupied West Bank: A Bayesian Approach to Poverty Dynamics Using Repeated Cross-Sections," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-24, May.
    7. Chan, Kai M.A. & Satterfield, Terre & Goldstein, Joshua, 2012. "Rethinking ecosystem services to better address and navigate cultural values," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 8-18.
    8. Robin L. Dillon & Vicki M. Bier & Richard Sheffield John & Abdullah Althenayyan, 2023. "Closing the Gap Between Decision Analysis and Policy Analysts Before the Next Pandemic," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 20(2), pages 109-132, June.
    9. Simon Varaine, 2023. "Dying to die: New micro and macro evidence that suicide terrorists are suicidal," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(3), pages 478-500, August.
    10. Omar García-Ponce & Lauren E Young & Thomas Zeitzoff, 2023. "Anger and support for retribution in Mexico’s drug war," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 60(2), pages 274-290, March.
    11. James A. Piazza, 2019. "Democratic skepticism and support for terrorism in the Palestinian Territories," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 417-443, March.
    12. Benjamin E. Goldsmith & Yusaku Horiuchi & Takashi Inoguchi, 2005. "American Foreign Policy and Global Opinion," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 49(3), pages 408-429, June.
    13. Nicolò Bellanca & Giancarlo Pichillo, 2014. "Identitarian passions: the overwhelming power of the human recognition need," International Review of Economics, Springer;Happiness Economics and Interpersonal Relations (HEIRS), vol. 61(1), pages 13-38, April.
    14. Carmen Tanner & Stefan Linder & Matthias Sohn, 2022. "Does moral commitment predict resistance to corruption? experimental evidence from a bribery game," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-22, January.
    15. Uriel Abulof, 2015. "The malpractice of “rationality†in international relations," Rationality and Society, , vol. 27(3), pages 358-384, August.
    16. Daniel Jacobson & Edward H. Kaplan, 2007. "Suicide Bombings and Targeted Killings in (Counter-) Terror Games," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 51(5), pages 772-792, October.
    17. Amir Sabri & Günther G. Schulze, 2021. "Are suicide terrorists different from ‘regular militants’?," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 188(1), pages 155-181, July.
    18. Morteza Dehghani & Scott Atran & Rumen Iliev & Sonya Sachdeva & Douglas Medin & Jeremy Ginges, 2010. "Sacred values and conflict over Iran's nuclear program," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 5(7), pages 540-546, December.
    19. Bernhard Leidner & Hammad Sheikh & Jeremy Ginges, 2012. "Affective Dimensions of Intergroup Humiliation," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(9), pages 1-6, September.
    20. Navin A. Bapat, 2007. "The Internationalization of Terrorist Campaigns," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 24(4), pages 265-280, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:2158244014521433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.