IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v3y2013i3p2158244013502984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of Women in Sericulture and Community Development

Author

Listed:
  • Eswarappa Kasi

Abstract

In any discourse on sociology and anthropology, one fact that clearly emerges is that women can generally be trusted to perform their duties with utmost care and attention. This is more so in the case of agriculture and allied activities. No wonder women are playing a very important role in the sericulture industry. Their qualities like maternal instincts and loving care of those under their charge prove to be very helpful in the successful breeding of silk worms. The sericulture industry has opened up phenomenal employment avenues and helped women to become important players in the decision-making process—whether in the household or in the community at large. The active involvement of women is very essential for the success of the any community development initiative. This has been proved on many occasions all over the world—more so in the developing countries. For instance, the success of Self Help Groups (SHGs) in Andhra Pradesh and other states of India is all due to the active role played by women. The thrust of this article is on the role of women in promotion of sericulture activities in the village, and how their participation has led to community development. Given the above backdrop, the present article is based on an empirical work undertaken in Kotha Indlu village, Chittoor District of Andhra Pradesh in South India. Sericulture is an important means for generating employment, income enhancement crop enterprises, and is a most appropriate household activity. In all these activities, women have shown their mettle and performed their tasks most skillfully. In the village under study, women are playing an important role in silk rearing and processing activities. This article will endeavor to show how “sericulture,†an agro-based activity, has brought about overall development of individual households, the village, and the community at large.

Suggested Citation

  • Eswarappa Kasi, 2013. "Role of Women in Sericulture and Community Development," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440135, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:3:p:2158244013502984
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244013502984
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244013502984
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244013502984?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amal Mandal, 2010. "Perpetually Toiling for Others," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 17(1), pages 135-150, January.
    2. P. Mohanan Pillai & N. Shanta, 2011. "ICT and Employment Promotion among Poor Women," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 18(1), pages 51-76, February.
    3. Amita Shah, 2000. "Natural Resource Management and Gender: Reflections from Watershed Programmes in India," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 7(1), pages 83-91, March.
    4. Meghana Kelkar, 2007. "Local Knowledge and Natural Resource Management," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 14(2), pages 295-306, June.
    5. Anindita Datta & Sachidanand Sinha, 1997. "Gender Disparities in Social Well-being: An Overview," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 4(1), pages 51-65, March.
    6. Ashima Goyal, 2007. "Women Making Choices," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 14(3), pages 409-437, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bozoglu, Mehmet & Ceyhan, Vedat, 2007. "Measuring the technical efficiency and exploring the inefficiency determinants of vegetable farms in Samsun province, Turkey," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 649-656, June.
    2. Sumi Krishna, 2001. "Introduction: Towards a 'Genderscape' of Community Rights in Natural Resource Management," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 8(2), pages 151-174, September.
    3. V. Dhanya, 2008. "Liberalisation of tropical commodity market and adding-up problem: A Bound test approach," Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum Working Papers 399, Centre for Development Studies, Trivendrum, India.
    4. Bilkis Vissandjée & Shelly Abdool & Alisha Apale & Sophie Dupéré, 2006. "Women's Political Participation in Rural India," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 13(3), pages 425-450, October.
    5. Isabelle Kunze, 2017. "Dualisms shaping human-nature relations: discovering the multiple meanings of social-ecological change in Wayanad," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(4), pages 983-994, December.
    6. Chaudhuri, Sanjukta, 2010. "Women's Empowerment in South Asia and Southeast Asia: A Comparative Analysis," MPRA Paper 19686, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Birhanu Megersa Lenjiso & Jeroen Smits & Ruerd Ruben, 2016. "Smallholder Milk Market Participation and Intra-household Time Allocation in Ethiopia," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 28(5), pages 808-825, November.
    8. Himangana Gupta, 2015. "Women and Climate Change: Linking Ground Perspectives to the Global Scenario," Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Centre for Women's Development Studies, vol. 22(3), pages 408-420, October.
    9. Das, Bibhunandini, 2019. "What Determines Computer literacy across Indian Household? A State-level Analysis," MPRA Paper 109526, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:3:y:2013:i:3:p:2158244013502984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.