IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i3p21582440241265357.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dispositional Predictors of Work/Family Interface Among Working Women

Author

Listed:
  • Ayesha Sarfaraz
  • Ayesha Khalid
  • Zasheer Aman

Abstract

The current research was carried out to identify dispositional predictors of work/family conflict and enrichment faced by working women. Purposive sampling strategy was used to collect a sample of 265 working women, out of which 129 were married and 136 were unmarried, aged between 22 to 54 years ( M  = 29.31, SD  = 6.39). Data was collected via Big Five Inventory (BFI), Work/Family Conflict Self-Efficacy Scale, Work/Family conflict Scale and Work/Family Enrichment scale. Data was analyzed using correlation, MANOVA and multiple regression analysis. Results revealed that married women with children experienced higher levels of work/family conflict than unmarried working women and married women having one or no children. Moreover, women living in nuclear family system had higher levels of work to family conflict and women living in joint family system had higher levels of family to work conflict. Regression analysis showed conscientiousness, neuroticism and work/family conflict self-efficacy as salient predictors of work/family conflict and extraversion, agreeableness and work/family conflict self-efficacy to be significant predictors of work/family enrichment. These results have important implications for individuals as well as organizations as they demonstrate that dispositional factors do play a major role in determining the levels of work/family conflict and enrichment and will help in identifying women who are more or less prone to experiencing the negative side of work/family interface so that additional support may be provided to them in terms of family friendly workplace policy, social support, and employee counseling, etc.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayesha Sarfaraz & Ayesha Khalid & Zasheer Aman, 2024. "Dispositional Predictors of Work/Family Interface Among Working Women," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241265357
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241265357
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241265357
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241265357?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deirdre Paulson & Melanie E. Leuty, 2016. "Dispositional Coping, Personality Traits, and Affective Style Relating to Conflict between Work and Family Domains," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 519-539, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. José Alberto Molina, 2021. "The Work–Family Conflict: Evidence from the Recent Decade and Lines of Future Research," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 4-10, July.
    2. Julie H Nielsen, 2018. "The effect of affect: How affective style determines attitudes towards the EU," European Union Politics, , vol. 19(1), pages 75-96, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241265357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.