IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241255834.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Occupation-Related Volunteering: A Qualitative Systematic Literature Review, Conceptualization, and Directions for Future Research

Author

Listed:
  • Karin Y. Biermann
  • Heiko Breitsohl
  • Lucas C. P. M. Meijs

Abstract

This review investigates the volunteering-work nexus, where an individual’s paid occupational work in the business, government, or voluntary sector is akin to their volunteer work: tasks and responsibilities are similar, but the structure, conditions, and relationships differ. Performing work spans their business and volunteer worlds and brings dynamic interactions between work and volunteering. Pro bono, skills-based, or corporate volunteering are terms in use; however, these conceptualizations of the underlying and interconnecting practices of work and volunteering are too limited. This transdisciplinary, qualitative systematic literature review of 62 scientific articles studies individuals using conceptualizations of work, volunteering, and occupations over their working life, from service-learning to retirement. With ambiguous boundaries and terminology in the literature, we introduce a new term— occupation-related volunteering —defined as an individual acting to benefit others without payment or coercion, developing, using, or maintaining their occupational knowledge, skills, and abilities, and drawing upon their economic, social, and cultural capital. The definition anticipates that an individual’s occupational resources change over their working life and vary depending on whether the volunteer is acting independently or with the support of their workplace. Occupation-related volunteering extends paid-unpaid and formal-informal boundaries to include volunteering in “paid†work time and in informal, community-based organizations and less public roles, such as mentoring. Finally, we encourage future research using the bibliometric data, suggestions in the reviewed articles, and our synthesis of the individual’s perspective of performing their occupational work as a volunteer.

Suggested Citation

  • Karin Y. Biermann & Heiko Breitsohl & Lucas C. P. M. Meijs, 2024. "Occupation-Related Volunteering: A Qualitative Systematic Literature Review, Conceptualization, and Directions for Future Research," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241255834
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241255834
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241255834
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241255834?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul H. Caldron & Ann Impens & Milena Pavlova & Wim Groot, 2018. "Why do they care? Narratives of physician volunteers on motivations for participation in short‐term medical missions abroad," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 67-87, January.
    2. Anne L. Christensen & Angela Woodland, 2018. "An Investigation of the Relationships Among Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) Participation and Ethical Judgment and Decision Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 529-543, February.
    3. Bitzer, Jürgen & Geishecker, Ingo, 2010. "Who contributes voluntarily to OSS? An investigation among German IT employees," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 165-172, February.
    4. Christian Fisch & Joern Block, 2018. "Six tips for your (systematic) literature review in business and management research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 68(2), pages 103-106, April.
    5. Lonneke Roza & Itamar Shachar & Lucas Meijs & Lesley Hustinx, 2017. "The nonprofit case for corporate volunteering: a multi-level perspective," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(11-12), pages 746-765, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    2. Jan Wiers & Didier Chabaud, 2022. "Bibliometric analysis of immigrant entrepreneurship research 2009–2019," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 12(1), pages 441-464, December.
    3. Anna Görlitz & Michael Dobler, 2023. "Financial accounting for deferred taxes: a systematic review of empirical evidence," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(1), pages 113-165, February.
    4. Chris Wagner, 2020. "Deducing a state-of-the-art presentation of the Eclectic Paradigm from four decades of development: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 51-96, February.
    5. Christin Höge-Junge & Stefan Eckert, 2024. "Multinationality and systematic risk: a literature review and meta-analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 377-414, February.
    6. Andreas Kuckertz & Leif Brändle, 2022. "Creative reconstruction: a structured literature review of the early empirical research on the COVID-19 crisis and entrepreneurship," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 281-307, June.
    7. Verena Komander & Andreas König, 2024. "Organizations on stage: organizational research and the performing arts," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(1), pages 303-352, February.
    8. Russell Tatenda Munodawafa & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2019. "A Systematic Review of Eco-Innovation and Performance from the Resource-Based and Stakeholder Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-23, November.
    9. W. Randy Clark & Leigh Anne Clark & Deana M. Raffo & Ralph I Williams, 2021. "Extending Fisch and Block’s (2018) tips for a systematic review in management and business literature," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(1), pages 215-231, February.
    10. Julia Neuhaus & Andrew Isaak & Denefa Bostandzic, 2022. "Million dollar personality: a systematic literature review on personality in crowdfunding," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(2), pages 309-345, June.
    11. Katarzyna Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek & Maciej Szymczak, 2024. "Understanding public service supply chain management: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(3), pages 1879-1943, September.
    12. Fazilah Hatta Antah & Muhamad Azry Khoiry & Khairul Nizam Abdul Maulud & Azlina Abdullah, 2021. "Perceived Usefulness of Airborne LiDAR Technology in Road Design and Management: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-22, October.
    13. Neelam Kaushal & Rahul Pratap Singh Kaurav & Brijesh Sivathanu & Neeraj Kaushik, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and HRM: identifying future research Agenda using systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 455-493, June.
    14. Pevnaya Maria & Cernicova-Buca Mariana, 2020. "Corporate volunteering in the large enterprises’ social mission – the case of a post-Soviet Russian industrial region," Central European Journal of Public Policy, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 31-42, June.
    15. Anna-Theresa Walter, 2021. "Organizational agility: ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 343-391, April.
    16. Alexandrina Maria Pauceanu & Nada Rabie & Ayman Moustafa & Daniel Constantin Jiroveanu, 2021. "Entrepreneurial Leadership and Sustainable Development—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, October.
    17. Adelaide Martins & Manuel Castelo Branco & Pedro Novo Melo & Carolina Machado, 2022. "Sustainability in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Muhammad Bilal Zafar & Ahmad Azam Sulaiman, 2019. "Corporate social responsibility and Islamic banks: a systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 159-206, June.
    19. Maximilian Schnippering, 2020. "R&D: the missing link between corporate social performance and financial performance?," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 243-255, May.
    20. Marie Madeleine Meurer & Maksim Belitski & Christian Fisch & Roy Thurik, 2024. "What gets published and what doesn’t? Exploring optimal distinctiveness and diverse expectations in entrepreneurship articles," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 1139-1170, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241255834. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.