IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241255554.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Mixed Methods Investigation of Mobile-Based Language Learning on EFL Students’ Listening, Speaking, Foreign Language Enjoyment, and Anxiety

Author

Listed:
  • Yun Bai

Abstract

This mixed-methods study examined the effectiveness of Rosetta Stone, a mobile-based language learning application, on Chinese EFL students’ listening, speaking, foreign language enjoyment (FLE), and foreign language anxiety (FLA). Two groups of intermediate Chinese EFL students from a language institute, with 33 students in the control group and 36 in the experimental group, were recruited as the participants. The treatment lasted for 3 months, with the experimental group using Rosetta Stone in addition to in-class instruction whereas the control group received only the regular in-class instruction. Data collection involved administering IELTS module tests of speaking and listening, FLE and FLA scales, as well as semi-structured interviews. ANCOVA, paired samples test, and content analysis were used for the data analysis of the quantitative and qualitative data. The results indicate that the experimental group showed significant improvements in their listening, speaking, FLE, and reduced FLA more than the control group. The results of the qualitative data indicated that the students had positive attitudes toward mobile-based language learning. The qualitative findings provided further support to the quantitative results and highlighted the convenience, flexibility, and engaging nature of the application. The outcomes stressed the potential benefits of using mobile-based language learning tools like Rosetta Stone as an effective supplementary method for improving EFL learning outcomes and promoting positive affective variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun Bai, 2024. "A Mixed Methods Investigation of Mobile-Based Language Learning on EFL Students’ Listening, Speaking, Foreign Language Enjoyment, and Anxiety," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241255554
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241255554
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241255554
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241255554?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241255554. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.