IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i2p21582440241240561.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Language Abstraction in Negative Online Customer Reviews: The Choice of Corporate Response Strategy and Voice

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Feng
  • Jinzhe Yan

Abstract

This study argues that the degree of linguistic abstraction in negative reviews can lead to varying levels of persuasiveness and that tailoring response strategies and voice according to the situation mitigates the impact of negative reviews. This study examines the impact of language abstraction in negative online reviews on potential customers’ attitudes and purchase intention, as well as the moderating effects of managerial responses, response strategies, and response voices on the persuasiveness of negative reviews. The data were collected through three studies that focused on reviews and managerial responses across both the service and functional product categories. The mediation analysis showed that, compared to abstract negative reviews, concrete negative reviews could significantly enhance potential customers’ attribution of responsibility toward service or product providers and their perception of stability and controllability of negative events, leading to a more negative perception of the company, but not lower purchase intention. Additionally, the moderation analysis showed that corporate responses could significantly reduce potential customers’ attribution of responsibility to the disputing company and improve their evaluation. Accommodative responses to concrete negative reviews and defensive responses to abstract negative reviews induced potential customers to make favorable judgments about the firm.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Feng & Jinzhe Yan, 2024. "Language Abstraction in Negative Online Customer Reviews: The Choice of Corporate Response Strategy and Voice," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241240561
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241240561
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241240561
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241240561?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lee, Michael T. & Theokary, Carol, 2021. "The superstar social media influencer: Exploiting linguistic style and emotional contagion over content?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 860-871.
    2. Weisstein, Fei L. & Song, Lei & Andersen, Peter & Zhu, Ying, 2017. "Examining impacts of negative reviews and purchase goals on consumer purchase decision," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 201-207.
    3. Purnawirawan, Nathalia & Eisend, Martin & De Pelsmacker, Patrick & Dens, Nathalie, 2015. "A Meta-analytic Investigation of the Role of Valence in Online Reviews," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 17-27.
    4. Huang, Guanxiong & Liang, Hai, 2021. "Uncovering the effects of textual features on trustworthiness of online consumer reviews: A computational-experimental approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1-11.
    5. Jonah Berger & Alan T. Sorensen & Scott J. Rasmussen, 2010. "Positive Effects of Negative Publicity: When Negative Reviews Increase Sales," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 815-827, 09-10.
    6. Zhao, Haichuan & Jiang, Lan & Su, Chenting, 2020. "To Defend or Not to Defend? How Responses to Negative Customer Review Affect Prospective customers' Distrust and Purchase Intention," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 45-64.
    7. Weitzl, Wolfgang & Hutzinger, Clemens, 2017. "The effects of marketer- and advocate-initiated online service recovery responses on silent bystanders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 164-175.
    8. van Noort, Guda & Willemsen, Lotte M., 2012. "Online Damage Control: The Effects of Proactive Versus Reactive Webcare Interventions in Consumer-generated and Brand-generated Platforms," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 131-140.
    9. Ned Kock, 2004. "The Psychobiological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(3), pages 327-348, June.
    10. Gaby A. C. Schellekens & Peeter W. J. Verlegh & Ale Smidts, 2010. "Language Abstraction in Word of Mouth," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 37(2), pages 207-223, August.
    11. Barcelos, Renato Hübner & Dantas, Danilo C. & Sénécal, Sylvain, 2018. "Watch Your Tone: How a Brand's Tone of Voice on Social Media Influences Consumer Responses," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 60-80.
    12. Wenlong Liu & Rongrong Ji, 2019. "Do Hotel Responses Matter?: A Comprehensive Perspective on Investigating Online Reviews," Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), IGI Global, vol. 32(3), pages 70-89, July.
    13. Liebrecht, Christine & Tsaousi, Christina & van Hooijdonk, Charlotte, 2021. "Linguistic elements of conversational human voice in online brand communication: Manipulations and perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 124-135.
    14. Surachartkumtonkun, Jiraporn (Nui) & Grace, Debra & Ross, Mitchell, 2021. "Unfair customer reviews: Third-party perceptions and managerial responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 631-640.
    15. Muhammad Rifki Shihab & Audry Pragita Putri, 2019. "Negative online reviews of popular products: understanding the effects of review proportion and quality on consumers’ attitude and intention to buy," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 159-187, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Lili, 2021. "The classification of online consumer reviews: A systematic literature review and integrative framework," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 226-251.
    2. Liebrecht, Christine & Tsaousi, Christina & van Hooijdonk, Charlotte, 2021. "Linguistic elements of conversational human voice in online brand communication: Manipulations and perceptions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 124-135.
    3. Marius Johnen & Oliver Schnittka, 2019. "When pushing back is good: the effectiveness of brand responses to social media complaints," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 858-878, September.
    4. Fan Zou & Yupeng Li & Jiahuan Huang, 2022. "Group interaction and evolution of customer reviews based on opinion dynamics towards product redesign," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 1131-1151, December.
    5. Javornik, Ana & Filieri, Raffaele & Gumann, Ralph, 2020. "“Don't Forget that Others Are Watching, Too!” The Effect of Conversational Human Voice and Reply Length on Observers' Perceptions of Complaint Handling in Social Media," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 100-119.
    6. Surachartkumtonkun, Jiraporn (Nui) & Grace, Debra & Ross, Mitchell, 2021. "Unfair customer reviews: Third-party perceptions and managerial responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 631-640.
    7. Ao Shen & Peng Wang & Yongyuan Ma, 2022. "When crowding‐in and when crowding‐out? The boundary conditions on the relationship between negative online reviews and online sales," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 2016-2032, September.
    8. Ismagilova, Elvira & Dwivedi, Yogesh K. & Slade, Emma, 2020. "Perceived helpfulness of eWOM: Emotions, fairness and rationality," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    9. Hutzinger, Clemens & Weitzl, Wolfgang J., 2021. "Co-creation of online service recoveries and its effects on complaint bystanders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 525-538.
    10. Weitzl, Wolfgang J. & Einwiller, Sabine A., 2020. "Profiling (un-)committed online complainants: Their characteristics and post-webcare reactions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 740-753.
    11. Tamaddoni, Ali & Seenivasan, Satheesh & Pallant, Jason I. & Skiera, Bernd, 2023. "Investigating the effect of status changes in review platforms," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 189-209.
    12. Vermeer, Susan A.M. & Araujo, Theo & Bernritter, Stefan F. & van Noort, Guda, 2019. "Seeing the wood for the trees: How machine learning can help firms in identifying relevant electronic word-of-mouth in social media," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 492-508.
    13. Chul Woo Yoo, 2020. "An Exploration of the Role of Service Recovery in Negative Electronic Word-of-Mouth Management," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 719-734, June.
    14. Colmekcioglu, Nazan & Marvi, Reza & Foroudi, Pantea & Okumus, Fevzi, 2022. "Generation, susceptibility, and response regarding negativity: An in-depth analysis on negative online reviews," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 235-250.
    15. Petcharat, Thanatchaphan & Jattamart, Aungkana & Leelasantitham, Adisorn, 2023. "A conceptual model to imply a negative innovation assessment framework on consumer behaviors through the electronic business platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    16. Sam Ransbotham & Nicholas H. Lurie & Hongju Liu, 2019. "Creation and Consumption of Mobile Word of Mouth: How Are Mobile Reviews Different?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 773-792, September.
    17. Könsgen, Raoul & Schaarschmidt, Mario & Ivens, Stefan & Munzel, Andreas, 2018. "Finding Meaning in Contradiction on Employee Review Sites — Effects of Discrepant Online Reviews on Job Application Intentions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 165-177.
    18. Bai, Yanzhuang & Li, Tingwu & Zheng, Chundong, 2022. "Is there any value in the online reviews of remedial satisfied customers? An empirical study in the hospitality industry," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    19. Huang, Ran & Ha, Sejin, 2020. "The effects of warmth-oriented and competence-oriented service recovery messages on observers on online platforms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 616-627.
    20. Yhee, Yerin & Kim, Hyemin & Kim, Jungkeun & Koo, Chulmo, 2023. "Trust in managerial response offsets negative review," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:2:p:21582440241240561. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.