IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v13y2023i4p21582440231216188.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chinese Multinationals’ Dynamic Integrations in the Developed Market: From a Resource Dependence Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Yanan Yang
  • Christoph Lütge

Abstract

Integrating the developed-market resources after acquisitions is a crucial tool for Chinese multinational enterprises (CMNEs) to accelerate industrial high-quality development. However, existing theories have scarce thorough explanations of the dynamic mechanism of CMNEs’ post-merger integrating resources. Our research aims at disclosing CMNEs’ post-merger integration (PMI) long-term dynamics under resource relatedness changes. We applied a multiple-case study with four typical CMNEs’ German-market PMI cases and proposed a theoretical framework based on a coding analysis of 38 interviews. Our findings highlight that: CMNEs change initial gentle integrations (partnering/preservation) to balance dependence when pre-merger resources complementary decreases with similarity increasing, or to extreme dependence when pre-merger resources similarity continually increases to extremely high. Pre-merger resource relatedness basics and later changes and CMNEs’ dynamic capability (threat and development potentials’ perception capabilities and utilization capability) are crucial factors in promoting CMNEs’ PMI changes. Our originality lies in that we consider the interactions resource relatedness changes and CMNEs’ PMI dynamics, strongly replenishing the deficiency of current PMI dynamic studies that lack considerations of resource relatedness changing; also, we simultaneously consider the two facets of dependence asymmetry and joint dependence such that broadened the application of resource dependence theory (RDT) in PMI studies. Our study offers managerial insights into CMNEs’ development leapfrog through acquisitions in developed markets that CMNEs should focus on the vital role of inter-firm resource relatedness changing. Initial gentle integration can be deepened when original resource backgrounds become more similar but should be cautious of the effect of power imbalance and selfish actions.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanan Yang & Christoph Lütge, 2023. "Chinese Multinationals’ Dynamic Integrations in the Developed Market: From a Resource Dependence Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231216188
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440231216188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440231216188
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440231216188?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Melissa E. Graebner & Koen H. Heimeriks & Quy N. Huy & Eero Vaara, 2017. "The Process of Postmerger Integration : A Review and Agenda for Future Research," Post-Print hal-02276670, HAL.
    2. Colman, Helene Loe, 2020. "Facilitating integration and maintaining autonomy: The role of managerial action and interaction in post-acquisition cabability transfer," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 148-160.
    3. Wei, Tian & Clegg, Jeremy, 2014. "Successful integration of target firms in international acquisitions: A comparative study in the Medical Technology industry," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 237-255.
    4. Chen, Feiqiong & Liu, Huiqian & Ge, Yuhao, 2021. "How does integration affect industrial innovation through networks in technology-sourcing overseas M&A? A comparison between China and the US," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 281-292.
    5. Torres de Oliveira, Rui & Rottig, Daniel, 2018. "Chinese acquisitions of developed market firms: Home semi-formal institutions and a supportive partnering approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 230-241.
    6. Emma Stendahl & Svante Schriber & Esther Tippmann, 2021. "Control changes in multinational corporations: Adjusting control approaches in practice," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 52(3), pages 409-431, April.
    7. Melissa E. Graebner & Koen H. Heimeriks & Quy N. Huy & Eero Vaara, 2017. "The Process of Postmerger Integration : A Review and Agenda for Future Research," Post-Print hal-02311973, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yanan Yang, 2024. "Spiral Forward: A Knowledge Management Perspective of Chinese Post-merger Autonomy Integration," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    2. Gada, Viswa Prasad & Goyal, Lakshmi & Popli, Manish, 2021. "Earnouts in M&A deal structuring: The impact of CEO prevention focus," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 27(1).
    3. Irwin, Kris & Gilstrap, Collin & McDowell, William & Drnevich, Paul & Gorbett, Abigail, 2022. "How knowledge and uncertainty affect strategic international business investment decisions: Implications for cross-border mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 831-842.
    4. Helene Loe Colman & Audrey Rouzies & Randi Lunnan, 2023. "Social integration in subsidiary-building acquisitions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(9), pages 1712-1722, December.
    5. Campagnolo, Diego & Vincenti, Giampiero, 2022. "Cross-border M&As: The impact of cultural friction and CEO change on the performance of acquired companies," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(4).
    6. Wang, Daojuan & Hain, Daniel S. & Larimo, Jorma & Dao, Li T., 2020. "Cultural differences and synergy realization in cross-border acquisitions," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(3).
    7. Chen, Feiqiong & Liu, Huiqian & Ge, Yuhao, 2021. "How does integration affect industrial innovation through networks in technology-sourcing overseas M&A? A comparison between China and the US," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 281-292.
    8. Colman, Helene Loe, 2020. "Facilitating integration and maintaining autonomy: The role of managerial action and interaction in post-acquisition cabability transfer," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 148-160.
    9. Panos Desyllas & Martin C. Goossen & Corey C. Phelps, 2024. "Investors’ Reactions to Alliance‐Engendered Acquisition Ambiguity: Evidence from U.S. Technology Deals," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1618-1653, June.
    10. McGrath, Patia J. & O’Neill, Hugh M., 2023. "Acquisitions of divested business units: A typology and strategies for success," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(5), pages 691-706.
    11. Cefis, Elena & Coad, Alex & Lucini-Paioni, Alessandro, 2023. "Landmarks as lighthouses: firms' innovation and modes of exit during the business cycle," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(8).
    12. Zhang, Xiaotao & Liu, Yipeng & Tarba, Shlomo Y. & Giudice, Manlio Del, 2020. "The micro-foundations of strategic ambidexterity: Chinese cross-border M&As, Mid-View thinking and integration management," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(6).
    13. Goretzki, Lukas & Reuter, Marek & Sandberg, Joanna & Thulin, Gabriella, 2022. "Making sense of employee satisfaction measurement – A technological frames of reference perspective," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    14. Tian Wei & Jeremy Clegg, 2020. "Untangling the Integration–Performance Link: Levels of Integration and Functional Integration Strategies in Post‐Acquisition Integration," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(8), pages 1643-1689, December.
    15. Julia González & Jorge Lemus & Guillermo Marshall, 2024. "Mergers and organizational disruption: Evidence from the US airline industry," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 111-130, January.
    16. Özgecan Koçak & Phanish Puranam, 2022. "Separated by a Common Language: How the Nature of Code Differences Shapes Communication Success and Code Convergence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 5287-5310, July.
    17. Smeulders, Dieter & Dekker, Henri C. & Van den Abbeele, Alexandra, 2023. "Post-acquisition integration: Managing cultural differences and employee resistance using integration controls," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    18. Yi Lin Chow, Dawn & Wen Chan, Xi & Micelotta, Evelyn, 2021. "Cross-border M&As: Theorizing the negative effect of political ideology mismatch with host country labor institutional context on employee outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 164-173.
    19. Florian Bauer & Martin Friesl, 2024. "Synergy Evaluation in Mergers and Acquisitions: An Attention‐Based View," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(1), pages 37-68, January.
    20. Rodgers, Waymond & Degbey, William Y. & Housel, Thomas J. & Arslan, Ahmad, 2020. "Microfoundations of collaborative networks: The impact of social capital formation and learning on investment risk assessment," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:13:y:2023:i:4:p:21582440231216188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.