IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i3p21582440221119471.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How New Nurses Experience Workplace Belonging: A Qualitative Study

Author

Listed:
  • Huang Ying Ching
  • Yiu Ting Fang
  • Wang Kwua Yun

Abstract

A sense of belonging is a need for interpersonal connections; it is a crucial factor that decides whether new graduate nurses can adapt to group working life in a clinical setting. Thus, a detailed understanding of the experience of workplace belonging could assist new graduate nurses adjust to entering the workforce. This study employed the qualitative methodology of phenomenology to examine the meaning of the experiences of workplace belonging of 12 new graduate nurse participants. Data collection methods included in-depth interviews and observations during the interview sessions. After data were collected, they were transcribed verbatim for the purpose of data analysis. New graduate nurses experience related to workplace belonging can be explained using five themes were identified, namely “adjust oneself to blend in,†“not being ignored,†“becoming an ally,†“achieving goals through concerted efforts,†and “sharing emotions and becoming family.†New graduate nurses experience various types of stress when they first start working in a clinical setting, and this is an issue that warrants the attention and support from all health professionals. Nursing managers could apply the findings of the current study to guide their unit colleagues. Identifying methods that could enhance new graduate nurses’ sense of workplace belonging and mutual recognition between employees and their work groups is beneficial for cultivating new graduate nurses’ sense of workplace belonging and facilitating their career growth.

Suggested Citation

  • Huang Ying Ching & Yiu Ting Fang & Wang Kwua Yun, 2022. "How New Nurses Experience Workplace Belonging: A Qualitative Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221119471
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221119471
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221119471
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221119471?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Grant R Kinghorn & Elizabeth J Halcomb & Terry Froggatt & Stuart DM Thomas, 2017. "Transitioning into new clinical areas of practice: An integrative review of the literature," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(23-24), pages 4223-4233, December.
    2. Kiri Hunter & Catherine Cook, 2018. "Role‐modelling and the hidden curriculum: New graduate nurses’ professional socialisation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(15-16), pages 3157-3170, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rachel M. Walker & Rhonda J. Boorman & Amanda Vaux & Marie Cooke & Leanne M. Aitken & Andrea P. Marshall, 2021. "Identifying barriers and facilitators to recognition and response to patient clinical deterioration by clinicians using a behaviour change approach: A qualitative study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5-6), pages 803-818, March.
    2. Hafidza Baharum & Aniza Ismail & Zainudin Awang & Lisa McKenna & Roszita Ibrahim & Zainah Mohamed & Nor Haty Hassan, 2023. "Validating an Instrument for Measuring Newly Graduated Nurses’ Adaptation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-16, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221119471. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.