IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221099529.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Same-Same, But Not: Comparing Aspects of Cultures in South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Aïda C. Terblanché-Greeff

Abstract

Oftentimes nations, societies, or communities are categorized based on cultural values, such as time orientation and social self-construal. Here, time orientation is represented by the dimensions of monochronism and polychronism; and social self-construal as individualism and collectivism. In some cases, it has been argued that individualism is complementary to the traits of monochronism, and collectivism is complementary to that of polychronism. Consequently, cultural communities have often been grouped as monochronic and individualistic (MONO+INDV), or polychronic and collectivistic (POLY+COLL), with little focus being allocated to unique cultural nuances. This paper represents cross-cultural philosophy, where cultural values are compared through the strategies of philosophical conceptual analysis and interpretive philosophical reflection. Specifically, this paper accentuates that focus should be allocated to cultural nuances of POLY+COLL cultures instead of grouping such cultures under one blanket conceptualization. Attention is allocated to three POLY+COLL cultures that are similar in some aspects but different in others. The cultures that receive such attention is to be found in South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand. The purpose is thus threefold. First, it introduces the categories of cultural values; second, it presents three different POLY+COLL cultures; and lastly, the three seemingly similar POLY+COLL cultures are placed in comparison—based on themes identified in the discussion—to facilitate better differentiation. As a result, it is elucidated that attention must be allocated to cultural nuances when conducting cross-cultural studies as this is identified as a gap in the knowledge-base.

Suggested Citation

  • Aïda C. Terblanché-Greeff, 2022. "Same-Same, But Not: Comparing Aspects of Cultures in South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221099529
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221099529
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221099529
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221099529?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wendi L. Adair & Nancy R. Buchan & Xiao-Ping Chen, 2009. "Conceptualizing Culture as Communication in Management and Marketing Research," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Cheryl Nakata (ed.), Beyond Hofstede, chapter 8, pages 146-180, Palgrave Macmillan.
    2. Chellie Spiller & Ljiljana Erakovic & Manuka Henare & Edwina Pio, 2011. "Relational Well-Being and Wealth: Māori Businesses and an Ethic of Care," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 98(1), pages 153-169, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lavanya Vijayasingham & Uma Jogulu & Pascale Allotey, 2018. "Enriching the Organizational Context of Chronic Illness Experience Through an Ethics of Care Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 29-40, November.
    2. Emir Ozeren & Aykut Arslan & Serdar Yener & Andrea Appolloni, 2020. "The Predictive Effect of Teachers’ Perception of School Principals’ Motivating Language on Teachers’ Self-Efficacy via a Cultural Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Agathe Morinière, 2023. "Ethical Implications of Acceleration: Perspectives From Health Professionals," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 188(4), pages 741-758, December.
    4. Amy Verbos & Maria Humphries, 2014. "A Native American Relational Ethic: An Indigenous Perspective on Teaching Human Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 123(1), pages 1-9, August.
    5. Alana Gall & Kate Anderson & Kirsten Howard & Abbey Diaz & Alexandra King & Esther Willing & Michele Connolly & Daniel Lindsay & Gail Garvey, 2021. "Wellbeing of Indigenous Peoples in Canada, Aotearoa (New Zealand) and the United States: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-31, May.
    6. Linda Tallberg & José-Carlos García-Rosell & Minni Haanpää, 2022. "Human–Animal Relations in Business and Society: Advancing the Feminist Interpretation of Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 180(1), pages 1-16, September.
    7. C, Deep Prakash & Majumdar, Adrija, 2023. "Predicting sports fans’ engagement with culturally aligned social media content: A language expectancy perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Chetan Sharma & Damir D. Torrico & Lloyd Carpenter & Roland Harrison, 2021. "Indigenous Meanings of Provenance in the Context of Alternative Food Movements and Supply-Chain Traceability: A Review," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    9. Vijayasingham, Lavanya & Jogulu, Uma & Allotey, Pascale, 2021. "Ethics of care and selective organisational caregiving by private employers for employees with chronic illness in a middle-income country," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    10. Arthur Grimes & Robert MacCulloch & Fraser McKay, 2015. "Indigenous Belief in a Just World: New Zealand M?ori and other Ethnicities Compared," Working Papers 15_14, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    11. Kévin André & Sylvain Bureau & Arthur Gautier & Olivier Rubel, 2017. "Beyond the Opposition Between Altruism and Self-interest: Reciprocal Giving in Reward-Based Crowdfunding," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 146(2), pages 313-332, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221099529. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.