IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v11y2021i3p21582440211031868.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of Research Topic Prevalence by Journal Impact Quartile in Oral Health Sciences Using Bayesian Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Carolina Cortes
  • Luis Vicente Gonzalez
  • Laura H. Gunn
  • Enrique ter Horst
  • German Molina
  • Silvia Restrepo
  • Juan Diego Zambrano

Abstract

The relationship between research topics and academic prestige of journals is of relevance to assess venues for current research as well as trending areas of new research. This is of special relevance for those developing a research agenda or with defined productivity outcome expectations. This manuscript extracts prevalent topics using titles and abstracts from more than 10,000 manuscripts, constituting all published research in International Scientific Indexing (ISI) journals within the oral health specialties of oral surgery, orthodontics, and periodontics during 2018. Journals are clustered across four quartile categories according to their impact factors. The novelty of our work includes (a) an examination of a neglected unit of analysis (bigram) in oral health sciences which is of higher relevance than single-word topic definitions and (b) the use of an efficient Bayesian hierarchical approach to extract and rank topics across quartiles with information borrowing. Some topics persisted across quartile groups, while others show higher prevalence in specific quartiles, indicating that topics may find some journal quartiles a more appropriate venue for publication. All quartile groups show a prevalence of empirical research. The approach described in this manuscript offers the possibility to adjust/generate research agendas based on research topic prevalence and dynamics. This methodology is relevant for researchers looking to define their research agendas with potential outcomes aligned with the expectations of quantity and quartile set by their home institutions. It also serves researchers to assess most likely quartiles for publication of their work.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Carolina Cortes & Luis Vicente Gonzalez & Laura H. Gunn & Enrique ter Horst & German Molina & Silvia Restrepo & Juan Diego Zambrano, 2021. "Assessment of Research Topic Prevalence by Journal Impact Quartile in Oral Health Sciences Using Bayesian Methods," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(3), pages 21582440211, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:21582440211031868
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440211031868
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440211031868
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440211031868?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadeem Shafique Butt & Ahmad Azam Malik & Muhammad Qaiser Shahbaz, 2021. "Bibliometric Analysis of Statistics Journals Indexed in Web of Science Under Emerging Source Citation Index," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(1), pages 21582440209, January.
    2. Matt Taddy, 2013. "Multinomial Inverse Regression for Text Analysis," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 108(503), pages 755-770, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Zhaoyuan & Yao, Jianfeng, 2019. "Testing for heteroscedasticity in high-dimensional regressions," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 9(C), pages 122-139.
    2. Monica Billio & Roberto Casarin & Matteo Iacopini, 2024. "Bayesian Markov-Switching Tensor Regression for Time-Varying Networks," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 119(545), pages 109-121, January.
    3. Nowak, Adam & Sayago-Gomez, Juan, 2018. "Homeowner preferences after September 11th, a microdata approach," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 330-351.
    4. Margaret E. Roberts & Brandon M. Stewart & Richard A. Nielsen, 2020. "Adjusting for Confounding with Text Matching," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(4), pages 887-903, October.
    5. Andreea Mironescu & Alina Moroșanu & Anca-Diana Bibiri, 2023. "The regional dynamics of multilingual publishing in web of science: A statistical analysis of central and eastern european journals and researchers in linguistics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(2), pages 1133-1162, February.
    6. Hansen, Stephen & Davis, Steven & Seminario-Amez, Cristhian, 2020. "Firm-level Risk Exposures and Stock Returns in the Wake of COVID-19," CEPR Discussion Papers 15314, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    7. John Kuk & Deborah Seligsohn & Jiakun Jack Zhang, 2022. "The partisan divide in U.S. congressional communications after the China shock," Economics and Politics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 494-526, July.
    8. Julia Cagé & Caroline Le Pennec & Elisa Mougin, 2021. "Corporate Donations and Political Rhetoric: Evidence from a National Ban," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03877943, HAL.
    9. Cocker Liu & Adam Nowak & Patrick Smith, 2017. "Some Remarks on Real Estate Pricing," Working Papers 17-20, Department of Economics, West Virginia University.
    10. Brian Jonghwan Lee, 2024. "Bankruptcy Lawyers and Credit Recovery," Working Papers 24-10, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    11. Luis Armona, 2018. "Measuring the Demand Effects of Formal and Informal Communication : Evidence from Online Markets for Illicit Drugs," Papers 1802.08778, arXiv.org.
    12. Adam Nowak & Amanda Ross & Christopher Yencha, 2018. "Small Business Borrowing And Peer‐To‐Peer Lending: Evidence From Lending Club," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 36(2), pages 318-336, April.
    13. Brad R. Humphreys & Adam Nowak & Yang Zhou, 2017. "Chinese Superstition and Real Estate Prices: Transaction-level Evidence from the US Housing Market," Working Papers 17-18, Department of Economics, West Virginia University.
    14. Silvia Peracchi, 2022. "The Migration Crisis in the Local News: Evidence from the French-Italian Border," CESifo Working Paper Series 10070, CESifo.
    15. Renáta Németh, 2023. "A scoping review on the use of natural language processing in research on political polarization: trends and research prospects," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 289-313, April.
    16. Carolina Navarro-Lopez & Salvador Linares-Mustaros & Carles Mulet-Forteza, 2022. "“The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data†by John Aitchison (1986): A Bibliometric Overview," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    17. Nicolas Pröllochs & Stefan Feuerriegel & Dirk Neumann, 2018. "Statistical inferences for polarity identification in natural language," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, December.
    18. Gavin Abercrombie & Riza Batista-Navarro, 2020. "Sentiment and position-taking analysis of parliamentary debates: a systematic literature review," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 245-270, April.
    19. Saskia Ter Ellen & Vegard H. Larsen & Leif Anders Thorsrud, 2022. "Narrative Monetary Policy Surprises and the Media," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 54(5), pages 1525-1549, August.
    20. Yencha, Christopher, 2019. "Valuing walkability: New evidence from computer vision methods," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 689-709.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:11:y:2021:i:3:p:21582440211031868. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.