IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i4p2158244020980751.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crowdsourcing for Research: Perspectives From a Delphi Panel

Author

Listed:
  • H. Bassi
  • L. Misener
  • A. M. Johnson

Abstract

Crowdsourcing, an open call for the public to collaborate and participate in problem solving, has been increasingly employed as a method in health-related research studies. Various reviews of the literature across different disciplines found crowdsourcing being used for data collection, processing, and analysis as well as tasks such as problem solving, data processing, surveillance/monitoring, and surveying. Studies on crowdsourcing tend to focus on its use of software, technology and online platforms, or its application for the purposes previously noted. There is need for further exploration to understand how best to use crowdsourcing for research, as there is limited guidance for researchers who are undertaking crowdsourcing for the purposes of scientific study. Numerous authors have identified gaps in research related to crowdsourcing, including a lack of decision aids to assist researchers using crowdsourcing, and best-practice guidelines. This exploratory study looks at crowdsourcing as a research method by understanding how and why it is being used, through application of a modified Delphi technique. It begins to articulate how crowdsourcing is applied in practice by researchers, and its alignment with existing research methods. The result is a conceptual framework for crowdsourcing, developed within traditional and existing research approaches as a first step toward its use in research.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Bassi & L. Misener & A. M. Johnson, 2020. "Crowdsourcing for Research: Perspectives From a Delphi Panel," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:2158244020980751
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020980751
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020980751
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020980751?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jessica P. Fefer & Sandra De-Urioste Stone & John Daigle & Linda Silka, 2016. "Using the Delphi Technique to Identify Key Elements for Effective and Sustainable Visitor Use Planning Frameworks," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huichuan Xia, 2023. "What scholars and IRBs talk when they talk about the Belmont principles in crowd work‐based research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 74(1), pages 67-80, January.
    2. Junjuan Du, 2023. "Rational or Impulsive? Early Backers’ Investment Behavior in Agri-Food Crowdfunding from 4P–4C Perspectives," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sanaz Shafiee & Ali Rajabzadeh Ghatari & Alireza Hasanzadeh & Saeed Jahanyan, 2022. "Developing a model for smart tourism destinations: an interpretive structural modelling approach," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 511-546, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:2158244020980751. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.