IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i4p2158244020969669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nontransparent Compound Character Learning in L2 Chinese: Does Radical Awareness Always Work?

Author

Listed:
  • Tianxu Chen
  • Yali Feng

Abstract

Chinese character learning requires various reading subskills, such as radical awareness and character knowledge. Radical awareness refers to learners’ ability to identify, analyze, and apply semantic radicals in compound characters. Previous studies have shown that radical awareness and character knowledge facilitate learning semantically transparent characters. Yet, little is known regarding whether radical awareness plays an active role in the meaning retention for nontransparent characters. The meanings of transparent characters, such as “河†(river) containing the radical “氵†(water), are related to the semantic category of the radicals within the characters, whereas the meanings of nontransparent characters, such as “淑†(kind and gentle) with the same radical “氵,†are not directly related to the radicals. To fill these gaps, this study included 39 L2 Chinese learners at one American university. They completed one character-learning session, and five radical-related and character-related tasks. The results suggested that radical awareness did not positively affect the meaning retention for nontransparent characters when learners’ character knowledge was controlled. In addition, character knowledge was a moderator, which shaped the relationship between radical awareness and character retention. Pedagogical implications for the understanding of L2 Chinese compound character learning are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianxu Chen & Yali Feng, 2020. "Nontransparent Compound Character Learning in L2 Chinese: Does Radical Awareness Always Work?," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:2158244020969669
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244020969669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244020969669
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244020969669?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Qing Cai & Marc Brysbaert, 2010. "SUBTLEX-CH: Chinese Word and Character Frequencies Based on Film Subtitles," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-8, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tian Fan & Jun Zheng & Xiao Hu & Ningxin Su & Yue Yin & Chunliang Yang & Liang Luo, 2021. "The contribution of metamemory beliefs to the font size effect on judgments of learning: Is word frequency a moderating factor?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Xiaoyun Wang & Degao Li, 2019. "Processing of Phonological and Orthographic Information in Word Recognition in Discourse Reading," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    3. Dangui Song & Degao Li, 2021. "Psycholinguistic Norms for 3,783 Two-Character Words in Simplified Chinese," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    4. Karl D. Neergaard & Chu-Ren Huang, 2019. "Constructing the Mandarin Phonological Network: Novel Syllable Inventory Used to Identify Schematic Segmentation," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-21, April.
    5. Lifeng Xue & Degao Li & Dangui Song & Wenling Ma, 2023. "Semantic Overlaps Between Chinese Two-Character Words and Constituent Characters: A Normative Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    nontransparent characters; radical awareness; character knowledge; character learning; L2 Chinese;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:4:p:2158244020969669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.