IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v10y2020i1p2158244019899055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Systematic Approach to Effective Conflict Management for Program

Author

Listed:
  • Nannan Wang
  • Guobin Wu

Abstract

Due to the complex structure and stakeholder relationships within a program, the management of conflicts in program therein proves more challenging than with a single project. The internal conflict of a program affects the performance of the program team and the success of the program. The previous researches focus more on the project level rather than program level, and lack a systematic analysis of management mechanism of team conflict. This research contributes to the program conflict literature by investigating the unique nature and solutions of conflict within program team, taking a systematic and innovative view on the organizational structure of a complex construction program. The findings reveal unique program conflict and their causes and impacts, and suggest the principles and alternative resolution strategies for conflict in program. The different roles of stakeholders in program conflict are analyzed by social network method. A program conflict management model is developed for the effective management of program conflicts. The model provides a systematic view of the learning cycle of program conflict management, including conflict identification, resolution, feedback, and prevention, of which many patterns are found distinct from project conflict management. The research results can benefit practitioners and researchers in better understanding and minimizing program conflict.

Suggested Citation

  • Nannan Wang & Guobin Wu, 2020. "A Systematic Approach to Effective Conflict Management for Program," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:2158244019899055
    DOI: 10.1177/2158244019899055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244019899055
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/2158244019899055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Charles Gyan & Abena Oforiwaa Ampomah, 2016. "Effects of Stakeholder Conflicts on Community Development Projects in Kenyase," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440166, March.
    2. Wang, Nannan & Jiang, Dongdong & Pretorius, Leon, 2016. "Conflict-resolving behaviour of project managers in international projects: A culture-based comparative study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 140-147.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. T Velmurugan & T Marirajan & V Gayathri, 2020. "A Study on the Effectiveness of Conflict Management in the Private Retail Sector, in Copperbelt Province," Shanlax International Journal of Management, Shanlax Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 1-6, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ajith, Vineeth & A.S., Reshma & Mohan, Renjith & Vinodini Ramesh, Maneesha, 2022. "Empowering communities in addressing drinking water challenges using a systematic, participatory and adaptive approach and sustainable PPP model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    2. Juliane Schütt & Katharina Löhr & Michelle Bonatti & Stefan Sieber, 2019. "Conflict Causes and Prevention Strategies at the Society-Science Nexus in Transdisciplinary Collaborative Research Settings: A Case Study of a Food Security Project in Tanzania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-19, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:10:y:2020:i:1:p:2158244019899055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.