IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v238y2024i5p1023-1036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Prioritisation of operations during emergency shutdown of a crude distillation unit by interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

Author

Listed:
  • Gopalakrishnan Suresh
  • Vadakkapaikkadu Ravindran Renjith
  • Anchalassery Balakrishnan Bhasi

Abstract

A very reliable control system for offering a safety layer in emergency scenarios is an emergency shutdown system, or ESD system. It aids in preventing crises from having disastrous effects on the economy, the environment or business operations. In any plant, emergency shutdown systems reduce the risk of harm to the working population, the environment or equipment damage by guarding against leaks, hydrocarbon escapes, fire outbreaks and explosions. The ESD system halts process activity in an emergency, ensures that the hazard is isolated and does not worsen. It is essential that there is a clearly defined emergency procedure in place when a facility needs to be shut down in an emergency. When preparing an emergency procedure for use in an emergency, it is crucial to prioritise the operations. The factory uses an Interval-valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (IVIFAHP) to prioritise activities in emergency situations. It is possible to design emergency shutdown systems using the aforementioned order of operations. It is possible to properly set up safety measures using the multi-criteria decision-making approach (MCDM). The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) compares variables without taking measurement scales or units into consideration, which is a distinct benefit. The AHP’s handling of ambiguity, uncertainty and imprecise data is improved by the IVIFAHP.

Suggested Citation

  • Gopalakrishnan Suresh & Vadakkapaikkadu Ravindran Renjith & Anchalassery Balakrishnan Bhasi, 2024. "Prioritisation of operations during emergency shutdown of a crude distillation unit by interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(5), pages 1023-1036, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:5:p:1023-1036
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X231193476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X231193476
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X231193476?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas L. Saaty, 1986. "Axiomatic Foundation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(7), pages 841-855, July.
    2. Vaidya, Omkarprasad S. & Kumar, Sushil, 2006. "Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 169(1), pages 1-29, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Garbuzova-Schlifter, Maria & Madlener, Reinhard, 2016. "AHP-based risk analysis of energy performance contracting projects in Russia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 559-581.
    3. Mehmet Yüksel, 2019. "A Model Proposal for the Evaluation of Chemistry Education in the Context of Learning Environment," Asian Journal of Education and Training, Asian Online Journal Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 488-494.
    4. Singh, Rana Pratap & Nachtnebel, Hans Peter, 2016. "Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) application for reinforcement of hydropower strategy in Nepal," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 43-58.
    5. Zehui Zhu & Jiaming Liu & He Zhu & Wudong Zhao, 2024. "Evaluating Scientific Tourism of Geoheritage: An Empirical Study of Fangshan Global Geopark in Beijing," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-24, December.
    6. de Luca, Stefano, 2014. "Public engagement in strategic transportation planning: An analytic hierarchy process based approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 110-124.
    7. Bernasconi, Michele & Choirat, Christine & Seri, Raffaello, 2014. "Empirical properties of group preference aggregation methods employed in AHP: Theory and evidence," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 232(3), pages 584-592.
    8. Peng Sun & Jiawei Yang & Yongfeng Zhi, 2019. "Multi-attribute decision-making method based on Taylor expansion," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(3), pages 15501477198, March.
    9. Wolfgang Ossadnik & Stefanie Schinke & Ralf H. Kaspar, 2016. "Group Aggregation Techniques for Analytic Hierarchy Process and Analytic Network Process: A Comparative Analysis," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 421-457, March.
    10. Nakagawa, Yoshinori & Nasu, Seigo & Saito, Taiki & Yamaguchi, Nobuyoshi, 2010. "Analytic hierarchy based policy design method (AHPo) for solving societal problems that require a multifaceted approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1545-1553, December.
    11. Maina, Joseph & Venus, Valentijn & McClanahan, Timothy R. & Ateweberhan, Mebrahtu, 2008. "Modelling susceptibility of coral reefs to environmental stress using remote sensing data and GIS models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 212(3), pages 180-199.
    12. Banai, Reza, 2010. "Evaluation of land use-transportation systems with the Analytic Network Process," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 3(1), pages 85-112.
    13. Guh, Yuh-Yuan, 1997. "Introduction to a new weighting method -- Hierarchy consistency analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 215-226, October.
    14. Nina Almasifar & Tülay Özdemir Canbolat & Milad Akhavan & Roberto Alonso González-Lezcano, 2021. "Proposing a New Methodology for Monument Conservation “SCOPE MANAGEMENT” by the Use of an Analytic Hierarchy Process Project Management Institute System and the ICOMOS Burra Charter," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-13, November.
    15. Xiaoxia Li, 2022. "Research on the Development Level of Rural E-Commerce in China Based on Analytic Hierarchy and Systematic Clustering Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.
    17. Wang, Ying-Ming & Elhag, Taha M.S., 2007. "A goal programming method for obtaining interval weights from an interval comparison matrix," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(1), pages 458-471, February.
    18. Danijela Tuljak-Suban & Patricija Bajec, 2022. "A Hybrid DEA Approach for the Upgrade of an Existing Bike-Sharing System with Electric Bikes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-23, October.
    19. Madjid Tavana & Mariya Sodenkamp & Leena Suhl, 2010. "A soft multi-criteria decision analysis model with application to the European Union enlargement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 393-421, December.
    20. Bhatta, Arun & Bigsby, Hugh R. & Cullen, Ross, 2011. "Alternative to Comprehensive Ecosystem Services Markets: The Contribution of Forest-Related Programs in New Zealand," 2011 Conference, August 25-26, 2011, Nelson, New Zealand 115350, New Zealand Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:5:p:1023-1036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.