IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v238y2024i4p777-796.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A modelling approach to studying variations in newborn life support procedure

Author

Listed:
  • Alfian Tan
  • Rasa Remenyte-Prescott
  • Michel Valstar
  • Don Sharkey

Abstract

Variations in clinical practice are common. However, some variations may cause undesired consequences. Careful consideration of their causes and effects is necessary to assure the quality of healthcare delivery. A modelling approach that could capture these aspects would help to achieve this goal. In this paper, a Newborn Life Support procedure is modelled. This activity is considered prone to error with reduced outcomes for the patient. Hence, it is necessary to understand the nature of the activity and its variations. A Coloured Petri Net (CPN) approach and a simulation technique are used for this purpose. The CPN colours are used to represent the characteristics of babies and to control the flow of tokens representing the resuscitation procedure. Probabilistic modelling aspects include the duration of individual tasks, the choice of treatment and the condition of the baby. The model outputs consist of the percentage of babies with an unsatisfactory outcome, the percentage of babies who need full resuscitation, and the duration of the procedure until a satisfactory condition is achieved. The modelling approach is demonstrated using a number of scenarios on some common NLS variations, relating to the maximum number of ventilation and the probability of errors in the inflation procedure.

Suggested Citation

  • Alfian Tan & Rasa Remenyte-Prescott & Michel Valstar & Don Sharkey, 2024. "A modelling approach to studying variations in newborn life support procedure," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(4), pages 777-796, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:4:p:777-796
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X231173595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X231173595
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X231173595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brailsford, S.C. & Harper, P.R. & Sykes, J., 2012. "Incorporating human behaviour in simulation models of screening for breast cancer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 219(3), pages 491-507.
    2. D. C. Evenden & S. C. Brailsford & C. M. Kipps & P. J. Roderick & B. Walsh, 2021. "Hybrid simulation modelling for dementia care services planning," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(9), pages 2147-2159, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mielczarek, Bożena, 2014. "Simulation modelling for contracting hospital emergency services at the regional level," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 287-299.
    2. Hazel Squires & Michael P. Kelly & Nigel Gilbert & Falko Sniehotta & Robin C. Purshouse, 2023. "The long‐term effectiveness and cost‐effectiveness of public health interventions; how can we model behavior? A review," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(12), pages 2836-2854, December.
    3. Osório, António, 2017. "Self-interest and equity concerns: A behavioural allocation rule for operational problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 205-213.
    4. Hessam Bavafa & Sergei Savin & Christian Terwiesch, 2021. "Customizing Primary Care Delivery Using E‐Visits," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(11), pages 4306-4327, November.
    5. Kucukyazici, Beste & Zhang, Yue & Ardestani-Jaafari, Amir & Song, Lijie, 2020. "Incorporating patient preferences in the design and operation of cancer screening facility networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 616-632.
    6. Fournier, Derrick L. & Zaric, Gregory S., 2013. "Simulating neonatal intensive care capacity in British Columbia," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 131-141.
    7. Osório, António (António Miguel), 2017. "Self-interest and Equity Concerns: A Behavioural Allocation Rule for Operational Problems," Working Papers 2072/290757, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Economics.
    8. Khaja Moiduddin & Syed Hammad Mian & Usama Umer & Hisham Alkhalefah & Abdul Sayeed, 2020. "Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Mapping to Evaluate Implant Design for Maxillofacial Reconstruction," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-33, November.
    9. Penny R. Breeze & Hazel Squires & Kate Ennis & Petra Meier & Kate Hayes & Nik Lomax & Alan Shiell & Frank Kee & Frank de Vocht & Martin O’Flaherty & Nigel Gilbert & Robin Purshouse & Stewart Robinson , 2023. "Guidance on the use of complex systems models for economic evaluations of public health interventions," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(7), pages 1603-1625, July.
    10. Jesús Isaac Vázquez-Serrano & Rodrigo E. Peimbert-García & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón, 2021. "Discrete-Event Simulation Modeling in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-20, November.
    11. Imran Ali & Devika Kannan, 2022. "Mapping research on healthcare operations and supply chain management: a topic modelling-based literature review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(1), pages 29-55, August.
    12. Franco, L. Alberto & Hämäläinen, Raimo P., 2016. "Behavioural operational research: Returning to the roots of the OR profession," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 791-795.
    13. Chen, Ting-Yu & Chang, Chien-Hung & Rachel Lu, Jui-fen, 2013. "The extended QUALIFLEX method for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and applications to medical decision making," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 615-625.
    14. Kılıç, Hakan & Güneş, Evrim Didem, 2024. "Patient adherence in healthcare operations: A narrative review," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:4:p:777-796. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.