IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v235y2021i3p391-402.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An efficient non-probabilistic importance analysis method based on MDRM and Taylor series expansion

Author

Listed:
  • Wenxuan Wang
  • Xiaoyi Wang

Abstract

The input variable of engineering structure inevitable has certain uncertainty. How to quantify the influence of those uncertainties on the uncertainty of structural response is an important issue in structural design. Non-probabilistic reliability importance analysis is one of the methods to quantify this influence when variable data information is insufficient. Although the method has great advantages for variables with insufficient data information, there is no efficient calculation method at present, and the excessive computational cost seriously hinders its application in actual engineering structures. In this paper, the multiplicative dimensional reduction method, Taylor series expansion and unary quadratic function are combined to put forward an efficient algorithm to estimate two non-probabilistic reliability importance indices. With the proposed method, all the calculation processes used to solve the extreme value of function are replaced by an approximate analytical solution. Since the proposed method is an approximate analytical solution, the calculation efficiency is extremely high. Three examples are investigated to verify the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenxuan Wang & Xiaoyi Wang, 2021. "An efficient non-probabilistic importance analysis method based on MDRM and Taylor series expansion," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(3), pages 391-402, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:3:p:391-402
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X20976740
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X20976740
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X20976740?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wei, Pengfei & Liu, Fuchao & Tang, Chenghu, 2018. "Reliability and reliability-based importance analysis of structural systems using multiple response Gaussian process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 183-195.
    2. Zhang-Chun Tang & Yanjun Xia & Qi Xue & Jie Liu, 2018. "A Non-Probabilistic Solution for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis on Techno-Economic Assessments of Biodiesel Production with Interval Uncertainties," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yulei Xie & Linrui Wang & Guohe Huang & Dehong Xia & Ling Ji, 2018. "A Stochastic Inexact Robust Model for Regional Energy System Management and Emission Reduction Potential Analysis—A Case Study of Zibo City, China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-24, August.
    2. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming & Gao, Liang & Li, Peigen, 2019. "A general failure-pursuing sampling framework for surrogate-based reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 47-59.
    3. Ameryan, Ala & Ghalehnovi, Mansour & Rashki, Mohsen, 2022. "AK-SESC: a novel reliability procedure based on the integration of active learning kriging and sequential space conversion method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    4. Lingling Bin & Haiyang Pan & Li He & Jijian Lian, 2019. "An Importance Analysis–Based Weight Evaluation Framework for Identifying Key Components of Multi-Configuration Off-Grid Wind Power Generation Systems under Stochastic Data Inputs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Zhang, Ruijing & Dai, Hongzhe, 2022. "A non-Gaussian stochastic model from limited observations using polynomial chaos and fractional moments," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    6. Qian, Hua-Ming & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2021. "Time-variant system reliability analysis method for a small failure probability problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    7. Guo, Qing & Liu, Yongshou & Chen, Bingqian & Yao, Qin, 2021. "A variable and mode sensitivity analysis method for structural system using a novel active learning Kriging model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    8. Francisco A. Buendia-Hernandez & Maria J. Ortiz Bevia & Francisco J. Alvarez-Garcia & Antonio Ruizde Elvira, 2022. "Sensitivity of a Dynamic Model of Air Traffic Emissions to Technological and Environmental Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Xiao, Mi & Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang, 2021. "A Kriging-assisted sampling method for reliability analysis of structures with hybrid uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    10. Phan, Hieu Chi & Dhar, Ashutosh Sutra & Bui, Nang Duc, 2023. "Reliability assessment of pipelines crossing strike-slip faults considering modeling uncertainties using ANN models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    11. Archer, Sophie A. & Murphy, Richard J. & Steinberger-Wilckens, Robert, 2018. "Methodological analysis of palm oil biodiesel life cycle studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 694-704.
    12. Xu, Zhaoyi & Saleh, Joseph Homer, 2021. "Machine learning for reliability engineering and safety applications: Review of current status and future opportunities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    13. Zahir Barahmand & Marianne S. Eikeland, 2022. "Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Cost Analysis through the Lens of Uncertainty: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang & Xiao, Mi, 2020. "A composite-projection-outline-based approximation method for system reliability analysis with hybrid uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    15. Wang, Yuhao & Gao, Yi & Liu, Yongming & Ghosh, Sayan & Subber, Waad & Pandita, Piyush & Wang, Liping, 2021. "Bayesian-entropy gaussian process for constrained metamodeling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    16. Moustapha, Maliki & Parisi, Pietro & Marelli, Stefano & Sudret, Bruno, 2024. "Reliability analysis of arbitrary systems based on active learning and global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    17. Cheng, Kai & Lu, Zhenzhou, 2021. "Adaptive Bayesian support vector regression model for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    18. Qian, Hua-Ming & Li, Yan-Feng & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2020. "Time-variant reliability analysis for industrial robot RV reducer under multiple failure modes using Kriging model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    19. Cheng, Jin & Wang, Jian & Wu, Xuezhou & Wang, Shuo, 2019. "An improved polynomial-based nonlinear variable importance measure and its application to degradation assessment for high-voltage transformer under imbalance data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 175-191.
    20. Liu, Fuchao & Wei, Pengfei & Tang, Chenghu & Wang, Pan & Yue, Zhufeng, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis for multivariate outputs based on multiple response Gaussian process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 287-298.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:3:p:391-402. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.