IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v232y2018i4p340-351.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Object-oriented Bayesian network for complex system risk assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Quan Liu
  • Ayeley Tchangani
  • François Pérès
  • Vicente Gonzalez-Prida

Abstract

In this article, we present a novel approach of modelling risk management process for complex systems. To overcome difficulties of modelling dynamic large-scale systems, the main idea is to split it into various structural homogeneous units. The object-oriented paradigm is used to this end but, unlike previous works, the proposed methodology allows variation in terms of internal parameters throughout the objects. This novel approach based on Bayesian network techniques is referred to as extended object-oriented Bayesian network. The main contribution of this article consists in establishing algorithms and methods on how to build and run such models. This article is an extension of a communication presented at AMEST by mainly developing a more realistic case study along with other improvements.

Suggested Citation

  • Quan Liu & Ayeley Tchangani & François Pérès & Vicente Gonzalez-Prida, 2018. "Object-oriented Bayesian network for complex system risk assessment," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(4), pages 340-351, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:4:p:340-351
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X17753026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X17753026
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X17753026?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Cilliers, 2001. "Boundaries, Hierarchies And Networks In Complex Systems," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 5(02), pages 135-147.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Richard Meissner & Inga Jacobs, 2016. "Theorising complex water governance in Africa: the case of the proposed Epupa Dam on the Kunene River," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 21-48, February.
    2. Francesca Froy, 2023. "Learning from architectural theory about how cities work as complex and evolving spatial systems," Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 16(3), pages 495-510.
    3. Keith R. Skene, 2021. "No goal is an island: the implications of systems theory for the Sustainable Development Goals," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(7), pages 9993-10012, July.
    4. Richard Marcantonio & Agustin Fuentes, 2020. "A Clear Past and a Murky Future: Life in the Anthropocene on the Pampana River, Sierra Leone," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Ron Martin & Peter Sunley, 2010. "Complexity Thinking and Evolutionary Economic Geography," Chapters, in: Ron Boschma & Ron Martin (ed.), The Handbook of Evolutionary Economic Geography, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Rhodes, Tim & Lancaster, Kari, 2019. "Evidence-making interventions in health: A conceptual framing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    7. Christopher A. Hartwell, 2017. "Understanding “Development”: Insights from Some Aspects of Complexity Theory," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 165-190, November.
    8. Nicolò Barbieri & Davide Consoli & Lorenzo Napolitano & François Perruchas & Emanuele Pugliese & Angelica Sbardella, 2023. "Regional technological capabilities and green opportunities in Europe," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(2), pages 749-778, April.
    9. Stefan Verweij, 2013. "Book Review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(6), pages 794-796, November.
    10. Camaren Peter & Mark Swilling, 2014. "Linking Complexity and Sustainability Theories: Implications for Modeling Sustainability Transitions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-29, March.
    11. Marton Gosztonyi, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of X-Y-Z Generation Entrepreneurs in a Semi-Peripheral EU Member Country: Insights from Regularized Regression Techniques," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 191-217.
    12. Kok, Kristiaan P.W. & Loeber, Anne M.C. & Grin, John, 2021. "Politics of complexity: Conceptualizing agency, power and powering in the transitional dynamics of complex adaptive systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(3).
    13. Claire F. O’Reilly & Louise Caffrey & Caroline Jagoe, 2021. "Disability Data Collection in a Complex Humanitarian Organisation: Lessons from a Realist Evaluation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-12, September.
    14. Nugus, Peter & Carroll, Katherine & Hewett, David G. & Short, Alison & Forero, Roberto & Braithwaite, Jeffrey, 2010. "Integrated care in the emergency department: A complex adaptive systems perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(11), pages 1997-2004, December.
    15. Mark A. Phillips & Jagjit Singh Srai, 2018. "Exploring Emerging Ecosystem Boundaries: Defining ‘The Game’," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(08), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Omid Omidvar & Roman Kislov, 2016. "R&D Consortia As Boundary Organisations: Misalignment And Asymmetry Of Boundary Management," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(02), pages 1-24, February.
    17. Krzakiewicz Kazimierz & Cyfert Szymon, 2012. "The Role of Leaders in Managing Organisation Boundaries," Management, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 7-22, May.
    18. Vatankhah, Sanaz & Bamshad, Vahideh & Altinay, Levent & De Vita, Glauco, 2023. "Understanding business model development through the lens of complexity theory: Enablers and barriers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    19. Nadine Ostern & Guido Perscheid & Caroline Reelitz & Jürgen Moormann, 2021. "Keeping pace with the healthcare transformation: a literature review and research agenda for a new decade of health information systems research," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(4), pages 901-921, December.
    20. Phillips, Mark A. & Ritala, Paavo, 2019. "A complex adaptive systems agenda for ecosystem research methodology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:4:p:340-351. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.