IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v225y2011i2p105-116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Maintenance policy on a finite time span for a gradually deteriorating system with imperfect improvements

Author

Listed:
  • A Ponchet
  • M Fouladirad
  • A Grall

Abstract

The study deals with a gradually deteriorating system such as a large structure. This system is studied over a finite time span where the finite horizon can be seen, for example, as an insurance deadline which requires a specific maintenance policy. Maintenance actions are assumed to be imperfect in this work. An improvement function is used to model the impact of the maintenance on the degradation level of the system. The improvement function is based in the virtual age model ARA 1 . A maintenance policy is then proposed in which maintenance actions are systematically performed at given maintenance dates, if the system has not already failed. It is assumed that in the event of a failure the system is not repaired. The system is then unavailable until the finite horizon. The proposed maintenance policy is assessed on the finite time span, and both maintenance dates and the number of maintenance actions are optimized.

Suggested Citation

  • A Ponchet & M Fouladirad & A Grall, 2011. "Maintenance policy on a finite time span for a gradually deteriorating system with imperfect improvements," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 105-116, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:225:y:2011:i:2:p:105-116
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006XJRR349
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006XJRR349
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006XJRR349?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kijima, Masaaki & Morimura, Hidenori & Suzuki, Yasusuke, 1988. "Periodical replacement problem without assuming minimal repair," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 194-203, November.
    2. Jayabalan, V. & Chaudhuri, Dipak, 1992. "An heuristic approach for finite time maintenance policy," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 251-256, October.
    3. Nicolai, R.P. & Frenk, J.B.G. & Dekker, R., 2007. "Modelling and optimizing imperfect maintenance of coatings on steel structures," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2007-24, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    4. van der Weide, J.A.M. & Pandey, M.D. & van Noortwijk, J.M., 2010. "Discounted cost model for condition-based maintenance optimization," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 236-246.
    5. Nakagawa, T. & Mizutani, S., 2009. "A summary of maintenance policies for a finite interval," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 89-96.
    6. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    7. Nielsen, Lars Relund & Kristensen, Anders Ringgaard, 2006. "Finding the K best policies in a finite-horizon Markov decision process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 175(2), pages 1164-1179, December.
    8. Jiang, R., 2009. "An accurate approximate solution of optimal sequential age replacement policy for a finite-time horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(8), pages 1245-1250.
    9. Kijima, Masaaki & Nakagawa, Toshio, 1992. "Replacement policies of a shock model with imperfect preventive maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 100-110, February.
    10. Zequeira, R.I. & Bérenguer, C., 2006. "Periodic imperfect preventive maintenance with two categories of competing failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(4), pages 460-468.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Do, Phuc & Voisin, Alexandre & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoit, 2015. "A proactive condition-based maintenance strategy with both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 22-32.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Jonge, Bram & Dijkstra, Arjan S. & Romeijnders, Ward, 2015. "Cost benefits of postponing time-based maintenance under lifetime distribution uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 15-21.
    2. Cheng, Tianjin & Pandey, Mahesh D. & van der Weide, J.A.M., 2012. "The probability distribution of maintenance cost of a system affected by the gamma process of degradation: Finite time solution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 65-76.
    3. Do, Phuc & Voisin, Alexandre & Levrat, Eric & Iung, Benoit, 2015. "A proactive condition-based maintenance strategy with both perfect and imperfect maintenance actions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 22-32.
    4. Tinga, Tiedo, 2010. "Application of physical failure models to enable usage and load based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(10), pages 1061-1075.
    5. de Jonge, Bram & Scarf, Philip A., 2020. "A review on maintenance optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(3), pages 805-824.
    6. Kivanç, İpek & Fecarotti, Claudia & Raassens, Néomie & van Houtum, Geert-Jan, 2024. "A scalable multi-objective maintenance optimization model for systems with multiple heterogeneous components and a finite lifespan," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(2), pages 567-579.
    7. P-E Labeau & M-C Segovia, 2011. "Effective age models for imperfect maintenance," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 117-130, June.
    8. M D Pandey & T Cheng & J A M van der Weide, 2011. "Finite-time maintenance cost analysis of engineering systems affected by stochastic degradation," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 241-250, June.
    9. W Zhu & M Fouladirad & C Bérenguer, 2015. "Bi-criteria maintenance policies for a system subject to competing wear and δ-shock failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(6), pages 485-500, December.
    10. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    11. Tanwar, Monika & Rai, Rajiv N. & Bolia, Nomesh, 2014. "Imperfect repair modeling using Kijima type generalized renewal process," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 24-31.
    12. Mitra Fouladirad & Antoine Grall, 2015. "Monitoring and condition-based maintenance with abrupt change in a system’s deterioration rate," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(12), pages 2183-2194, September.
    13. Nguyen, Dinh Tuan & Dijoux, Yann & Fouladirad, Mitra, 2017. "Analytical properties of an imperfect repair model and application in preventive maintenance scheduling," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(2), pages 439-453.
    14. Najafi, Seyedvahid & Zheng, Rui & Lee, Chi-Guhn, 2021. "An optimal opportunistic maintenance policy for a two-unit series system with general repair using proportional hazards models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    15. Ming Tan, Cher & Raghavan, Nagarajan, 2008. "A framework to practical predictive maintenance modeling for multi-state systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(8), pages 1138-1150.
    16. Ponchet, Amélie & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2010. "Assessment of a maintenance model for a multi-deteriorating mode system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1244-1254.
    17. Chaabane, K. & Khatab, A. & Diallo, C. & Aghezzaf, E.-H. & Venkatadri, U., 2020. "Integrated imperfect multimission selective maintenance and repairpersons assignment problem," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    18. Sou-Sen Leu & Tao-Ming Ying, 2020. "Replacement and Maintenance Decision Analysis for Hydraulic Machinery Facilities at Reservoirs under Imperfect Maintenance," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-10, May.
    19. Zhao, Xufeng & Al-Khalifa, Khalifa N. & Magid Hamouda, Abdel & Nakagawa, Toshio, 2017. "Age replacement models: A summary with new perspectives and methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 95-105.
    20. P Baraldi & M Compare & A Despujols & E Zio, 2011. "Modelling the effects of maintenance on the degradation of a water-feeding turbo-pump of a nuclear power plant," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 225(2), pages 169-183, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:225:y:2011:i:2:p:105-116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.