IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v224y2010i2p113-135.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probabilistic risk assessment framework for software propagation analysis of failures

Author

Listed:
  • Y Wei
  • M Rodriguez
  • C S Smidts

Abstract

Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) is a methodology consisting of techniques to assess the probability of failure or success of a system. It has been proven to be a systematic, logical, and comprehensive methodology for risk assessment. However, the contribution of software to risk has not been well studied. To address this shortcoming, recent research has focused on the development of an approach to systematically integrate software risk contributions into the PRA framework. The latter research has identified as key the need to quantify various major software-failure-related contributions to risk. Of these contributions, the quantification of input failures is the topic of this paper. An input failure consists of a failure of a system component directly or indirectly connected to a software component, which reaches the software input and propagates through the software component. The paper studies and quantifies the impact of input failures on the software component and then further on in the system, and outlines a framework to systematically conduct such an analysis. An application to a safety-critical system is also provided that illustrates the application of the concepts introduced in the paper.

Suggested Citation

  • Y Wei & M Rodriguez & C S Smidts, 2010. "Probabilistic risk assessment framework for software propagation analysis of failures," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 224(2), pages 113-135, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:224:y:2010:i:2:p:113-135
    DOI: 10.1243/1748006XJRR241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1243/1748006XJRR241
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1243/1748006XJRR241?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhu, Dongfeng & Mosleh, Ali & Smidts, Carol, 2007. "A framework to integrate software behavior into dynamic probabilistic risk assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(12), pages 1733-1755.
    2. Bin Li & Ming Li & Ken Chen & Carol Smidts, 2006. "Integrating Software into PRA: A Software‐Related Failure Mode Taxonomy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 997-1012, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Turati, Pietro & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Advanced RESTART method for the estimation of the probability of failure of highly reliable hybrid dynamic systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 117-126.
    2. Maidana, Renan G. & Parhizkar, Tarannom & Gomola, Alojz & Utne, Ingrid B. & Mosleh, Ali, 2023. "Supervised dynamic probabilistic risk assessment: Review and comparison of methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    3. Brissaud, Florent & Smidts, Carol & Barros, Anne & Bérenguer, Christophe, 2011. "Dynamic reliability of digital-based transmitters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 793-813.
    4. Park, Jong Woo & Lee, Seung Jun, 2022. "Simulation optimization framework for dynamic probabilistic safety assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    5. Nejad, Hamed S. & Parhizkar, Tarannom & Mosleh, Ali, 2022. "Automatic generation of event sequence diagrams for guiding simulation based dynamic probabilistic risk assessment (SIMPRA) of complex systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    6. Thieme, Christoph A. & Mosleh, Ali & Utne, Ingrid B. & Hegde, Jeevith, 2020. "Incorporating software failure in risk analysis – Part 1: Software functional failure mode classification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    7. Thieme, Christoph A. & Mosleh, Ali & Utne, Ingrid B. & Hegde, Jeevith, 2020. "Incorporating software failure in risk analysis––Part 2: Risk modeling process and case study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:224:y:2010:i:2:p:113-135. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.