IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/reorpe/v56y2024i2p319-323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Book Review: Pollution Is Colonialism

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Keaney

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Keaney, 2024. "Book Review: Pollution Is Colonialism," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 56(2), pages 319-323, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:56:y:2024:i:2:p:319-323
    DOI: 10.1177/04866134241231831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/04866134241231831
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/04866134241231831?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roy J. Rotheim, 1989. "Organicism and the Role of the Individual in Keynes’ Thought," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(2), pages 316-326, December.
    2. Mark Huberty, 2015. "Awaiting the Second Big Data Revolution: From Digital Noise to Value Creation," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 35-47, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mattila, Juri & Seppälä, Timo, 2015. "Blockchains as a Path to a Network of Systems - An Emerging New Trend of the Digital Platforms in Industry and Society," ETLA Reports 45, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    2. Eleonora Di Maria & Valentina De Marchi & Ambra Galeazzo, 2022. "Industry 4.0 technologies and circular economy: The mediating role of supply chain integration," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 619-632, February.
    3. Ingram, Julie & Maye, Damian & Bailye, Clive & Barnes, Andrew & Bear, Christopher & Bell, Matthew & Cutress, David & Davies, Lynfa & de Boon, Auvikki & Dinnie, Liz & Gairdner, Julian & Hafferty, Caitl, 2022. "What are the priority research questions for digital agriculture?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    4. Grimaldi, Didier & Fernandez, Vicenc, 2017. "The alignment of University curricula with the building of a Smart City: A case study from Barcelona," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 298-306.
    5. Fleming, Aysha & Jakku, Emma & Fielke, Simon & Taylor, Bruce M. & Lacey, Justine & Terhorst, Andrew & Stitzlein, Cara, 2021. "Foresighting Australian digital agricultural futures: Applying responsible innovation thinking to anticipate research and development impact under different scenarios," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    6. Marco Bettiol & Mauro Capestro & Eleonora Di Maria & Stefano Micelli, 2020. "At The Roots Of The Fourth Industrial Revolution: How ICT Investments Affect Industry 4.0 Adoption," "Marco Fanno" Working Papers 0253, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche "Marco Fanno".
    7. Rajesh Chidananda Reddy & Biplab Bhattacharjee & Debasisha Mishra & Anandadeep Mandal, 2022. "A systematic literature review towards a conceptual framework for enablers and barriers of an enterprise data science strategy," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 223-255, March.
    8. Jang, Kyeong Kook & Bae, Joonheui & Kim, Kyung Hoon, 2021. "Servitization experience measurement and the effect of servitization experience on brand resonance and customer retention," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 384-397.
    9. Bell, David & Lycett, Mark & Marshan, Alaa & Monaghan, Asmat, 2021. "Exploring future challenges for big data in the humanitarian domain," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 453-468.
    10. Nadežda Jankelová & Zuzana Joniaková, 2021. "The role of innovative work behaviour and knowledge-based dynamic capabilities in increasing the innovative performance of agricultural enterprises," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(9), pages 363-372.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:reorpe:v:56:y:2024:i:2:p:319-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.urpe.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.