IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/ratsoc/v4y1992i4p451-469.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rational Choice and the Limits of Theoretical Generality

Author

Listed:
  • JAMES B. RULE

    (State University of New York at Stony Brook)

Abstract

Claims that rational choice analysis represents a general theory of social processes raise questions not only about rational choice but about the very idea of theoretical generality. Logically, a truly general theory ought to offer analytical means to all legitimate ends of social inquiry. This article holds, however, that no theory based on any single genre of social processes (rational calculation included) can serve the full range of descriptive or explanatory purposes properly addressed by sociologists. Rational choice thinking, like other claimants to the status of theoretical generality, misleads when its proponents doggedly insist on posing accounts invoking rational calculation to explain outcomes where other social processes are actually crucial. Acknowledgment of this fact can be expected to lead to the qualifications and amendments identified by Smelser as “theoretical degeneration .â€

Suggested Citation

  • James B. Rule, 1992. "Rational Choice and the Limits of Theoretical Generality," Rationality and Society, , vol. 4(4), pages 451-469, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:4:y:1992:i:4:p:451-469
    DOI: 10.1177/1043463192004004007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1043463192004004007
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1043463192004004007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil J. Smelser, 1992. "The Rational Choice Perspective," Rationality and Society, , vol. 4(4), pages 381-410, October.
    2. Norman K. Denzin, 1990. "Reading Rational Choice Theory," Rationality and Society, , vol. 2(2), pages 172-189, April.
    3. James S. Coleman, 1989. "Rationality and Society," Rationality and Society, , vol. 1(1), pages 5-9, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aaron Wildavsky, 1994. "Why Self-Interest Means Less Outside of a Social Context," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(2), pages 131-159, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mary K. Farmer, 1992. "On the Need to Make a Better Job of Justifying Rational Choice Theory," Rationality and Society, , vol. 4(4), pages 411-420, October.
    2. Neil J. Smelser, 1992. "The Rational Choice Perspective," Rationality and Society, , vol. 4(4), pages 381-410, October.
    3. Eric H. Rambo, 1999. "Symbolic Interests And Meaningful Purposes," Rationality and Society, , vol. 11(3), pages 317-342, August.
    4. Arnout van de Rijt, 2017. "Microfoundations of institutional change," Rationality and Society, , vol. 29(1), pages 63-68, February.
    5. Thomas J. Fararo, 1992. "Rationality and Formal Theory," Rationality and Society, , vol. 4(4), pages 437-450, October.
    6. Kroneberg, Clemens & Stocké, Volker & Yaish, Meir, 2006. "Norms or rationality? : The rescue of jews, electoral participation, and educational decisions," Papers 06-09, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    7. Hartmut Esser, 1993. "The Rationality of Everyday Behavior," Rationality and Society, , vol. 5(1), pages 7-31, January.
    8. Kroneberg, Clemens, 2006. "The definition of the situation and variable rationality : the model of frame selection as a general theory of action," Papers 06-05, Sonderforschungsbreich 504.
    9. Santos, Susana & Gonçalves, Helena Martins, 2021. "The consumer decision journey: A literature review of the foundational models and theories and a future perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    10. Gudmund Hernes, 1992. "We Are Smarter than We Think," Rationality and Society, , vol. 4(4), pages 421-436, October.
    11. Clemens Kroneberg & Meir Yaish & Volker Stocké, 2010. "Norms and Rationality in Electoral Participation and in the Rescue of Jews in WWII," Rationality and Society, , vol. 22(1), pages 3-36, February.
    12. David Dequech, 2003. "Uncertainty and Economic Sociology:," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 62(3), pages 509-532, July.
    13. Aaron Wildavsky, 1994. "Why Self-Interest Means Less Outside of a Social Context," Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 6(2), pages 131-159, April.
    14. Barry O'Neill, 1995. "Weak Models, Nil Hypotheses, And Decorative Statistics," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 39(4), pages 731-748, December.
    15. Neil J. Smelser, 1993. "Response to Discussants," Rationality and Society, , vol. 5(1), pages 141-145, January.
    16. Zafirovski, Milan, 1998. "Socio-economics and rational choice theory: Specification of their relations," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 27(2), pages 165-205.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:ratsoc:v:4:y:1992:i:4:p:451-469. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.