IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/psydev/v35y2023i1p169-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Threat by Association, Islamic Puritanism and Conspiracy Beliefs Explain A Religious Majority Group’s Collective Protest Against Religious Minority Groups

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Mashuri
  • Chad Osteen

Abstract

This article addresses the question of why members of a majority group, despite their more powerful status, may protest against low-power minority groups. The present study addressed this question in the context of immanent intergroup relations between Muslims, as the majority group, and non-Muslims, as the minority group, in Indonesia. It is argued that at the core of such collective protests is a threat by association, a perception of the majority group members that the minority groups are in league with the West which threatens the existence of Muslims worldwide. Based on data collected using a survey questionnaire from Indonesian Muslims ( N = 418) this study tested a hypothesised model using threat by association posed by the minority groups, Islamic puritanism and beliefs relating to western conspiracy to predict collective protests and intolerant intentions against non-Muslim minorities in Indonesia by using MPlus version 7.0. The hypothesised model found empirical support. The relationship between threat by association and Islamic puritanism with collective protests was mediated by Western conspiracy beliefs. It was also found that support for collective protests got translated into majority group members’ religious intolerant intentions against the people belonging to the non-Muslim minority groups. The article discusses the theoretical implications and research limitations of these empirical findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Mashuri & Chad Osteen, 2023. "Threat by Association, Islamic Puritanism and Conspiracy Beliefs Explain A Religious Majority Group’s Collective Protest Against Religious Minority Groups," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 35(1), pages 169-196, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:35:y:2023:i:1:p:169-196
    DOI: 10.1177/09713336231152312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09713336231152312
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09713336231152312?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul Marshall, 2018. "The Ambiguities of Religious Freedom in Indonesia," The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(1), pages 85-96, January.
    2. Robert W. Hefner, 2017. "Christians, Conflict, and Citizenship in Muslim-Majority Indonesia," The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(1), pages 91-101, January.
    3. Ali Mashuri & Esti Zaduqisti, 2019. "Explaining Muslims’ Aggressive Tendencies Towards the West: The Role of Negative Stereotypes, Anger, Perceived Conflict and Islamic Fundamentalism," Psychology and Developing Societies, , vol. 31(1), pages 56-87, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moamen Gouda & Jerg Gutmann, 2021. "Islamic constitutions and religious minorities," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 186(3), pages 243-265, March.
    2. Sheruni De Alwis & Nick Parr & Fei Guo, 2022. "The interacting effects of religion and birthplace on the labour market outcomes of Asian immigrants in Australia," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 39(2), pages 157-199, June.
    3. Adam James Fenton, 2024. "The Pancasila Ideological Direction Bill (RUU‐HIP): A Missed Opportunity?," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 12.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:psydev:v:35:y:2023:i:1:p:169-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.