IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/prodev/v3y2003i2p147-158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil society responses to poverty reduction strategies in Nicaragua

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah Bradshaw

    (Middlesex University, UK, s.bradshaw@mdx.ac.uk)

  • Brian Linneker

    (Middlesex University, UK)

Abstract

This paper considers the recent experience of civil society organizations in Nicaragua within the Poverty Reduction Strategies Papers (PRSP) process. The focus of the paper is not the poverty reduction strategy itself but rather civil society responses to this initiative in Nicaragua. It highlights the problems beginning to emerge within this process in relation to the World Bank-IMF, the national government and organized civil society. Fundamental to the conceptualization and design of PRSP is the idea of ‘national ownership’ facilitated by wide consultation and participation of civil society in the formulation and evaluation of individual country strategies. This paper uses Nicaragua’s PRSP process to examine the extent to which organized civil society can really influence PRSP formulation. It highlights the differences that exist in how poverty is defined and discussed by the key actors and examines civil society’s response to government proposals and the strategies they have adopted to promote an ‘alternative’ people-centred development perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah Bradshaw & Brian Linneker, 2003. "Civil society responses to poverty reduction strategies in Nicaragua," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 3(2), pages 147-158, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:3:y:2003:i:2:p:147-158
    DOI: 10.1191/1464993403ps058ra
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1191/1464993403ps058ra
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1191/1464993403ps058ra?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sarah Bradshaw, 2002. "Exploring the gender dimensions of reconstruction processes post-hurricane Mitch," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 14(6), pages 871-879.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silke Schwarz, 2014. "Women¡¯s Economic Empowerment and Social Change from a Culture-Psychological Perspective," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(4), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Lyons, Michal, 2009. "Building Back Better: The Large-Scale Impact of Small-Scale Approaches to Reconstruction," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 385-398, February.
    3. Roger Few & Hazel Marsh & Garima Jain & Chandni Singh & Mark Glyn Llewellyn Tebboth, 2021. "Representing Recovery: How the Construction and Contestation of Needs and Priorities Can Shape Long-term Outcomes for Disaster-affected People," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 21(1), pages 7-25, January.
    4. Binh, Phung Thanh & Zhu, Xueqin & Groeneveld, Rolf A. & van Ierland, Ekko C., 2020. "Risk communication, women’s participation and flood mitigation in Vietnam: An experimental study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    5. Gabi Hufschmidt, 2011. "A comparative analysis of several vulnerability concepts," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 58(2), pages 621-643, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:3:y:2003:i:2:p:147-158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.