IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/prodev/v16y2016i3p244-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Retroliberalism and the new aid regime of the 2010s

Author

Listed:
  • Warwick E Murray

    (Development Studies Programme, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand)

  • John Overton

    (Development Studies Programme, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand)

Abstract

This article coins the term ‘retroliberalism’ to describe the aid regime that has evolved out of the post-Global Financial Crisis (GFC) world order. This approach sees a partial return to the principles of classical liberalism with respect to the role of the state vis-à -vis the market, whilst also perpetuating a number of the principles of neoliberalism. At the same time, the rejuvenation of an active state harks back to modernization principles prevalent in the 1950s and 1960s. In describing this regulatory shift we suggest that a retroliberal ‘manual’ for aid practice can be discerned. Our analysis utilizes evidence from recent reforms in a range of Western aid donors that are members of the United Nation’s DAC, including the United Kingdom, Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the Netherlands. It also offers some comment on the increasing role and influence of non-traditional donors such as China in shaping the new regime. Ultimately, we argue that this state-led post-industrial modernization that serves to facilitate and sustain the accumulation of private capital harks back to the post-War development period.

Suggested Citation

  • Warwick E Murray & John Overton, 2016. "Retroliberalism and the new aid regime of the 2010s," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 16(3), pages 244-260, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:16:y:2016:i:3:p:244-260
    DOI: 10.1177/1464993416641576
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1464993416641576
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1464993416641576?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Klingebiel, Stephan, 2014. "The future of the ODA concept: the political dimensions of a seemingly technical discussion," Briefing Papers 8/2014, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Glenn Banks & Warwick Murray & John Overton & Regina Scheyvens, 2012. "Paddling on One Side of the Canoe? The Changing Nature of New Zealand's Development Assistance Programme," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 30(2), pages 169-186, March.
    3. Jean Grugel & Pía Riggirozzi, 2012. "Post-neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and Reclaiming the State after Crisis," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 43(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emma Mawdsley & Warwick E. Murray & John Overton & Regina Scheyvens & Glenn Banks, 2018. "Exporting stimulus and “shared prosperity†: Reinventing foreign aid for a retroliberal era," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 36(S1), pages 25-43, March.
    2. Joe Gerlach, 2017. "Ecuador’s experiment in living well: Sumak kawsay, Spinoza and the inadequacy of ideas," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(10), pages 2241-2260, October.
    3. Beatriz Bustos, 2015. "Moving on? Neoliberal continuities through crisis: the case of the Chilean salmon industry and the ISA virus," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(6), pages 1361-1375, December.
    4. Peter Howard-Jones & Jens Hölscher, 2020. "The Influence Of The Washington Consensus Programme On The Transitional Economies Of Eastern Europe – A Firm-Level Analysis," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 65(226), pages 9-44, July – Se.
    5. Schützhofer, Timm B., 2016. "Ecuador’s fiscal policies in the context of the citizens’ revolution: a ‘virtuous cycle’ and its limits," IDOS Discussion Papers 15/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    6. Nicole Jenne, 2013. "Whither the push and pull for integration: Taking stock of Latin America’s declaratory regionalism," RSCAS Working Papers 2013/82, European University Institute.
    7. Lewis, David, 2015. "Contesting parallel worlds: time to abandon the distinction between the ‘international’ and ‘domestic’ contexts of third sector scholarship?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 59636, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Parizeau, Kate, 2015. "When Assets are Vulnerabilities: An Assessment of Informal Recyclers’ Livelihood Strategies in Buenos Aires, Argentina," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 161-173.
    9. Kauffman, Craig M. & Martin, Pamela L., 2017. "Can Rights of Nature Make Development More Sustainable? Why Some Ecuadorian lawsuits Succeed and Others Fail," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 130-142.
    10. Fontana, Lorenza B. & Grugel, Jean, 2016. "The Politics of Indigenous Participation Through “Free Prior Informed Consent”: Reflections from the Bolivian Case," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 249-261.
    11. Pfeiffer, James & Gimbel, Sarah & Chilundo, Baltazar & Gloyd, Stephen & Chapman, Rachel & Sherr, Kenneth, 2017. "Austerity and the “sector-wide approach” to health: The Mozambique experience," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 208-216.
    12. Surbhi Kesar & Snehashish Bhattacharya & Lopamudra Banerjee, 2020. "Contradictions and crisis in the world of work in the present conjuncture: Informality, precarity and the pandemic," Working Papers 253, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK, revised Oct 2022.
    13. Villalba-Eguiluz, C. Unai & Etxano, Iker, 2017. "Buen Vivir vs Development (II): The Limits of (Neo-)Extractivism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 1-11.
    14. Veltmeyer, Henry, 2020. "Latin America in the vortex of social change: Development and social movement dynamics," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    15. Hickey, Sam, 2013. "Beyond the Poverty Agenda? Insights from the New Politics of Development in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 194-206.
    16. Andrea Marston & Tom Perreault, 2017. "Consent, coercion and cooperativismo: Mining cooperatives and resource regimes in Bolivia," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(2), pages 252-272, February.
    17. Wendy Godek, 2021. "Food sovereignty policies and the quest to democratize food system governance in Nicaragua," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 38(1), pages 91-105, February.
    18. Pia Riggirozzi, 2013. "Latin America after Neoliberalism: Developmental Regimes in Post-Crisis States , by Christopher Wylde," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(8), pages 1150-1152, August.
    19. Suliasi Vunibola, 2023. "“Want to help someone? Shut up and listen”: Foreign aid, maladaptation, and community development practices in the Pacific," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(S2), December.
    20. Scarlato, Margherita & D'Agostino, Giorgio, 2016. "The political economy of cash transfers: a comparative analysis of Latin American and sub-Saharan African experiences," IDOS Discussion Papers 6/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:16:y:2016:i:3:p:244-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.