IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/prodev/v11y2011i1p33-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Inclusive neoliberalism?

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Klak

    (Department of Geography, Miami University, Oxford)

  • James Wiley

    (Department of Global Studies and Geography, Hofstra University Hempstead, New York)

  • Emma Gaalaas Mullaney

    (Department of Geography and Women’s Studies, Pennsylvania State University, State College)

  • Swetha Peteru

    (Department of Geography, Miami University, Oxford)

  • Seann Regan

    (Department of Geography, Miami University, Oxford)

  • Jean-Yves Merilus

    (Department of Geography, Miami University, Oxford)

Abstract

Banana farming in the Eastern Caribbean has gone from riches to rags since the 1990s, as the region’s economic and social mainstay has severely contracted. This article reports on interviews conducted at the grassroots level with about 150 current or former banana farmers in Dominica and St. Lucia, and at the administrative level with numerous government and banana sector officials and other stakeholders. The interviews sought to answer two interrelated questions: ( a ) How have farmers experienced and responded to this severe contraction in the banana export industry? and ( b ) To what extent does current development policy support farmers’ economic needs? Indeed, many of the stated goals of the current development paradigm, referred to as ‘inclusive neoliberalism’, align with the farmers’ stated needs. We seek to understand the extent to which this development policy manifests itself at the grassroots level in the form of support that small farmers can actually use to help sell their products. Our interviews document multiple ways that banana farmers have been hurt by changes in international trade policy. The interviews also reveal a considerable gap between the stated desires and development policy priorities of farmers, on the one hand, and the impacts of development policy at the grassroots level, on the other. We conclude with suggestions on how to bridge the gap between inclusive neoliberal development policy and the needs of small farmers, who for decades have been the social and economic bedrock of Eastern Caribbean societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Klak & James Wiley & Emma Gaalaas Mullaney & Swetha Peteru & Seann Regan & Jean-Yves Merilus, 2011. "Inclusive neoliberalism?," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 11(1), pages 33-61, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:11:y:2011:i:1:p:33-61
    DOI: 10.1177/146499341001100103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/146499341001100103
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/146499341001100103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Craig, David & Porter, Doug, 2003. "Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers: A New Convergence," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 53-69, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martin Painter, 2005. "The Politics of State Sector Reforms in Vietnam: Contested Agendas and Uncertain Trajectories," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 261-283.
    2. Cristina Irina PARASCHIV, 2017. "The role of education in poverty alleviation," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special), pages 115-134.
    3. Donovan Storey & Hannah Bulloch & John Overton, 2005. "The poverty consensus: some limitations of the ‘popular agenda’," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 5(1), pages 30-44, January.
    4. Madalina Viorica ION (MANU) & Ilie VASILE, 2017. "How much is the listed enterprise worth? The price multipliers’ approach," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special), pages 77-82.
    5. Gulrajani, Nilima, 2010. "Challenging global accountability: the intersection of contracts and culture in the World Bank," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 30045, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Cristina VLAD & Birol IBADULA & Claudiu IONIȚĂ & Petre BREZEANU, 2017. "The influence of VAT on prices and inflation rate. Romania case," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special), pages 106-114.
    7. Yaqi Du & Rong Zhao, 2023. "Early Warning of Poverty Returning against the Background of Rural Revitalization: A Case Study of Two Counties in Guangxi Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, May.
    8. Tracy Smith‐Carrier & Andrea Lawlor & Sarah Benbow, 2019. "An “Opportunity” for Policy Recycling? A Critical Analysis of the Canadian Poverty Reduction Strategy," Poverty & Public Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(4), pages 325-343, December.
    9. Hickey, Sam, 2005. "The politics of staying poor: exploring the political space for poverty reduction in Uganda," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 33(6), pages 995-1009, June.
    10. Tatiana BOGDAN, 2017. "Financing medical services in Romania’s health system," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special), pages 7-16.
    11. Kerstin Danert & Richard C. Carter & Ronnie Rwamwanja & Jamil Ssebalu & Graham Carr & David Kane, 2003. "The private sector in rural water and sanitation services in Uganda: understanding the context and developing support strategies," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 15(8), pages 1099-1114.
    12. Adebayo Adedokun, 2015. "Invigorating foreign aid administration: remittances’ strategy, pro-poor and gender focus," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Georgeta VINTILĂ & Radu Alin PĂUNESCU & Ştefan Cristian GHERGHINA, 2017. "Determinants of effective corporate tax rate. Empirical evidence from listed companies in Eastern European Stock Exchanges," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special), pages 37-46.
    14. Vlad BRĂTĂŞANU, 2017. "Digital innovation the new paradigm for financial services industry," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special), pages 83-94.
    15. Gulrajani, Nilima, 2017. "Bilateral Donors and the Age of the National Interest: What Prospects for Challenge by Development Agencies?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 375-389.
    16. Malin Hasselskog, 2020. "What happens to local participation when national ownership gets stronger? Initiating an exploration in Rwanda and Cambodia," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 91-111, May.
    17. Bruno Boidin, 2005. "Droit à la santé et coopération internationale : les déficiences institutionnelles," Mondes en développement, De Boeck Université, vol. 129(1), pages 75-92.
    18. Susanne Schech & Anuradha Mundkur & Tracey Skelton & Uma Kothari, 2015. "New spaces of development partnership: Rethinking international volunteering," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 15(4), pages 358-370, October.
    19. Cosmin SERBANESCU & Adrian VINTILESCU-BELCIUG, 2017. "Social assistance efficiency in Romanian labor market context," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special), pages 65-76.
    20. David Lewis & Paul Opoku-Mensah, 2006. "Moving forward research agendas on international NGOs: theory, agency and context," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 18(5), pages 665-675.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:prodev:v:11:y:2011:i:1:p:33-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.