IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v23y2024i4p368-384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Behavioral economics and the evidential defense of welfare economics

Author

Listed:
  • Garth Heutel

Abstract

Hausman and McPherson provide an evidential defense of welfare economics, arguing that preferences are not constitutive of welfare but nevertheless provide the best evidence for what promotes welfare. Behavioral economics identifies several ways in which some people's preferences exhibit anomalies that are incoherent or inconsistent with rational choice theory. I argue that the existence of these behavioral anomalies calls into question the evidential defense of welfare economics. The evidential defense does not justify preference purification, or eliminating behavioral anomalies before conducting welfare analysis. But without doing so, the evidential defense yields implausible welfare implications. I discuss how the evidential defense could be modified to accommodate behavioral anomalies.

Suggested Citation

  • Garth Heutel, 2024. "Behavioral economics and the evidential defense of welfare economics," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 23(4), pages 368-384, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:23:y:2024:i:4:p:368-384
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X241239987
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X241239987
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X241239987?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:23:y:2024:i:4:p:368-384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.