IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/pophec/v17y2018i3p235-256.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regulating offense, nurturing offense

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Mark Simpson

    (Monash University, Australia)

Abstract

Joel Feinberg’s Offense to Others is the most comprehensive contemporary work on the significance of offense in a liberal legal system. Feinberg argues that being offended can impair a person’s liberty, much like a nuisance, and that it is therefore legitimate in principle to regulate conduct because of its offensiveness. In this article, I discuss some overlooked considerations that give us reason to resist Feinberg’s conclusion, even while granting this premise. My key claim is that the regulation of offense can inadvertently increase the incidence of offense, by nurturing offense-taking sensibilities. In the course of defending this claim and spelling out its implications, I explain why concerns about the inadvertent nurturing of offense are now more pressing, given the identity–political character of contemporary offense-based social conflicts, and I discuss why a reluctance to legally regulate offensive conduct need not be insensitive to the identity–political issues that animate those conflicts.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Mark Simpson, 2018. "Regulating offense, nurturing offense," Politics, Philosophy & Economics, , vol. 17(3), pages 235-256, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:17:y:2018:i:3:p:235-256
    DOI: 10.1177/1470594X17741228
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X17741228
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1470594X17741228?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Philip Cook & Conrad Heilmann, 2013. "Two Types of Self-Censorship: Public and Private," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 61(1), pages 178-196, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anda Rožukalne & Aija Kažoka & Linda Siliņa, 2024. "“Are Journalists Traitors of the State, Really?”—Self-Censorship Development during the Russian–Ukrainian War: The Case of Latvian PSM," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, June.
    2. K. Kwon & Shin-Il Moon & Michael Stefanone, 2015. "Unspeaking on Facebook? Testing network effects on self-censorship of political expressions in social network sites," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1417-1435, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:pophec:v:17:y:2018:i:3:p:235-256. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.