IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/metjou/v17y2018i1p18-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Antecedents Determining Quality of Management Education in Punjab: A Student’s Outlook

Author

Listed:
  • Gitika Nagrath
  • Amarjit S. Sidhu

Abstract

In the present study, factors responsible for the determination of quality of management education have been identified. The viewpoint of management students of second year/fourth semester at master’s level has been discussed on quality of professional management education. A sample of 590 management students from 28 management institutes affiliated to Punjab Technical University (PTU) in the state of Punjab has been taken. Data recorded are analysed with the help of factor analysis, weighted mean scores, and chi-square. The results indicated five factors which influence the quality of management education which includes student’s readiness and orientation, teaching quality, advancement opportunities, satisfaction with the system, and level of discipline. The study revealed high level of teaching quality, sufficient advancement opportunities, satisfaction with the system, and discipline maintenance but low student’s readiness and orientation. It may be because of the less exposure and awareness about the processes and methodologies that are adopted by top-notch management institutes and data also support that about 80 per cent of the students belong to and study in management institutes of Punjab state. In addition to this, significant association has been found out between student’s readiness and orientation with the socio-economic profile of the students.

Suggested Citation

  • Gitika Nagrath & Amarjit S. Sidhu, 2018. "Antecedents Determining Quality of Management Education in Punjab: A Student’s Outlook," Metamorphosis: A Journal of Management Research, , vol. 17(1), pages 18-27, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:metjou:v:17:y:2018:i:1:p:18-27
    DOI: 10.1177/0972622518774859
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0972622518774859
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0972622518774859?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sam Hill & Thomas Chalaux, 2011. "Improving Access and Quality in the Indian Education System," OECD Economics Department Working Papers 885, OECD Publishing.
    2. repec:ksb:journl:v:3:y:2010:i:1:p:7-24 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Zakia Khan & Jashim Uddin Ahmed & Shah Md. Al-Emran Sarker, 2010. "Faculty Mobility in the Private Universities: Developing Country Context," KASBIT Business Journals (KBJ), Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology (KASBIT), vol. 3, pages 7-24, December.
    4. J. Scott Armstrong & Tad Sperry, 1994. "The Ombudsman: Business School Prestige—Research versus Teaching," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 24(2), pages 13-43, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Armstrong, J. Scott, 2012. "Natural Learning in Higher Education," MPRA Paper 37648, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Ghosh Dastidar, Sayantan & Chatterji, Monojit, 2015. "Public expenditure in different education sectors and economic growth: The Indian experience," MPRA Paper 66903, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Carè, R. & Weber, O., 2023. "How much finance is in climate finance? A bibliometric review, critiques, and future research directions," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    4. Vicente Safón & Domingo Docampo, 2020. "Analyzing the impact of reputational bias on global university rankings based on objective research performance data: the case of the Shanghai Ranking (ARWU)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 2199-2227, December.
    5. Vicente Safón, 2013. "What do global university rankings really measure? The search for the X factor and the X entity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 223-244, November.
    6. Rebecca Long & Aleta Crawford & Michael White & Kimberly Davis, 2009. "Determinants of faculty research productivity in information systems: An empirical analysis of the impact of academic origin and academic affiliation," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 78(2), pages 231-260, February.
    7. Vicente Safón, 2019. "Inter-ranking reputational effects: an analysis of the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THE) reputational relationship," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(2), pages 897-915, November.
    8. Pauline Dixon, 2013. "International Aid and Private Schools for the Poor," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15122.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:metjou:v:17:y:2018:i:1:p:18-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.