IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v8y1988i2p120-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Exponential Model Used for optimal Threshold selection on ROC Curues

Author

Listed:
  • William L. England

Abstract

A two-parameter exponential equation for modeling a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is presented, where the area under the curve is a simple function of one of the parameters. The model makes no distributional assumptions about the underlying normal and abnormal patient populations or about the shape of the resulting ROC curves. In a computer simulation of 75 ROC curves, the model provides a fit equivalent to the maximum likelihood estimate method commonly used for ROC curve fitting. Similar results are obtained using the model to fit ROC curve data from the literature. The model's equation calculates the true-positive ratio as a function of the false-positive ratio, and has a first derivative that is useful for finding the optimal decision threshold for a diagnostic testing procedure. In particular, the model is useful in a computer program for finding jointly optimal thresholds for multiple sequential tests. Key words: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve; decision theory; optimization; computer simulation. (Med Decis Making 8:120-131, 1988)

Suggested Citation

  • William L. England, 1988. "An Exponential Model Used for optimal Threshold selection on ROC Curues," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 8(2), pages 120-131, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:8:y:1988:i:2:p:120-131
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X8800800208
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X8800800208?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James E. Goin & David F. Preston & Joe H. Gallagher & Audrey V. Wegst, 1983. "Comparison of Five Digital Scintigraphic Display Modes," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 3(2), pages 215-227, June.
    2. Peter Schönemann & Ledyard Tucker, 1967. "A maximum likelihood solution for the method of successive intervals allowing for unequal stimulus dispersions," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 32(4), pages 403-417, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wayne DeSarbo & Joonwook Park & Vithala Rao, 2011. "Deriving joint space positioning maps from consumer preference ratings," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Geert Soete & J. Carroll, 1983. "A maximum likelihood method for fitting the wandering vector model," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 48(4), pages 553-566, December.
    3. J. Ramsay, 1973. "The effect of number of categories in rating scales on precision of estimation of scale values," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 38(4), pages 513-532, December.
    4. Yoshio Takane, 1981. "Multidimensional successive categories scaling: A maximum likelihood method," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 9-28, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:8:y:1988:i:2:p:120-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.