IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v8y1988i1p19-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Selection of a Battery of Tests

Author

Listed:
  • Shaolin Hu
  • Yacov Y. Haimes
  • Robert S. Galen

Abstract

The general problem of selecting a battery of tests for diagnostic purposes is discussed and multiobjective optimization methodology is applied to solve it, with battery selection being based on performance indices such as sensitivity, specificity, and the cost of testing. For a battery of tests, the extended majority rule is developed and used to interpret the compound test results. The major advantage of the model developed in this paper is that it can generate a set of noninferior batteries without requiring the calculation of all possible combinations of tests. An example in which the method is applied to a real problem—the selection of short- term tests to detect the carcinogenicity of chemicals—is discussed. Key words: test battery selection; optimization. (Med Decis Making 8:19-32, 1988)

Suggested Citation

  • Shaolin Hu & Yacov Y. Haimes & Robert S. Galen, 1988. "Optimal Selection of a Battery of Tests," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 8(1), pages 19-32, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:8:y:1988:i:1:p:19-32
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X8800800103
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X8800800103
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X8800800103?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John C. Hershey & Randall D. Cebul & Sankey V. Williams, 1986. "Clinical Guidelines for Using Two Dichotomous Tests," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 6(2), pages 68-78, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maria G.M. Hunink & Douglas K. Richardson & Peter M. Doubilet & Colin B. Begg, 1990. "Testing for Fetal Pulmonary Maturity," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 10(3), pages 201-211, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frank Noonan & Charles A. Vidich, 1992. "Decision Analysis for Utilizing Hazardous Waste Site Assessments in Real Estate Acquisition," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(2), pages 245-251, June.
    2. Nathaniel D. Phillips & Hansjörg Neth & Jan K. Woike & Wolfgang Gaissmaier, 2017. "FFTrees: A toolbox to create, visualize, and evaluate fast-and-frugal decision trees," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 12(4), pages 344-368, July.
    3. repec:cup:judgdm:v:12:y:2017:i:4:p:344-368 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Sanjay Jain & Jónas Oddur Jónasson & Jean Pauphilet & Kamalini Ramdas, 2023. "Robust combination testing: methods and application to COVID-19 detection," Economics Series Working Papers 1009, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    5. Phillips, Nathaniel D. & Neth, Hansjörg & Woike, Jan K. & Gaissmaier, Wolfgang, 2017. "FFTrees: A toolbox to create, visualize, and evaluate fast-and-frugal decision trees," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 12(4), pages 344-368.
    6. Davis, Elizabeth B. & Ashton, Robert H., 2002. "Threshold adjustment in response to asymmetric loss functions: The case of auditors' "substantial doubt" thresholds," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 89(2), pages 1082-1099, November.
    7. Peter Deneef, 1987. "Evaluating Rapid Tests for Streptococcal Pharyngitis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 7(2), pages 92-96, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:8:y:1988:i:1:p:19-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.