IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v38y2018i1_supplp99s-111s.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The University of Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model: An Update

Author

Listed:
  • Oguzhan Alagoz

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI)

  • Mehmet Ali Ergun

    (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI)

  • Mucahit Cevik

    (University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada)

  • Brian L. Sprague

    (Department of Surgery and University of Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT)

  • Dennis G. Fryback

    (Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI)

  • Ronald E. Gangnon

    (Department of Population Health Sciences and Department of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI)

  • John M. Hampton

    (Department of Population Health Sciences and Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI)

  • Natasha K. Stout

    (Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA)

  • Amy Trentham-Dietz

    (Department of Population Health Sciences and Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI)

Abstract

The University of Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model (UWBCS), also referred to as Model W, is a discrete-event microsimulation model that uses a systems engineering approach to replicate breast cancer epidemiology in the US over time. This population-based model simulates the lifetimes of individual women through 4 main model components: breast cancer natural history, detection, treatment, and mortality. A key feature of the UWBCS is that, in addition to specifying a population distribution in tumor growth rates, the model allows for heterogeneity in tumor behavior, with some tumors having limited malignant potential (i.e., would never become fatal in a woman’s lifetime if left untreated) and some tumors being very aggressive based on metastatic spread early in their onset. The model is calibrated to Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) breast cancer incidence and mortality data from 1975 to 2010, and cross-validated against data from the Wisconsin cancer reporting system. The UWBCS model generates detailed outputs including underlying disease states and observed clinical outcomes by age and calendar year, as well as costs, resource usage, and quality of life associated with screening and treatment. The UWBCS has been recently updated to account for differences in breast cancer detection, treatment, and survival by molecular subtypes (defined by ER/HER2 status), to reflect the recent advances in screening and treatment, and to consider a range of breast cancer risk factors, including breast density, race, body-mass-index, and the use of postmenopausal hormone therapy. Therefore, the model can evaluate novel screening strategies, such as risk-based screening, and can assess breast cancer outcomes by breast cancer molecular subtype. In this article, we describe the most up-to-date version of the UWBCS.

Suggested Citation

  • Oguzhan Alagoz & Mehmet Ali Ergun & Mucahit Cevik & Brian L. Sprague & Dennis G. Fryback & Ronald E. Gangnon & John M. Hampton & Natasha K. Stout & Amy Trentham-Dietz, 2018. "The University of Wisconsin Breast Cancer Epidemiology Simulation Model: An Update," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(1_suppl), pages 99-111, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:38:y:2018:i:1_suppl:p:99s-111s
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X17711927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X17711927
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X17711927?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Y. Claire Wang & Barry I. Graubard & Marjorie A. Rosenberg & Karen M. Kuntz & Ann G. Zauber & Lisa Kahle & Clyde B. Schechter & Eric J. Feuer, 2013. "Derivation of Background Mortality by Smoking and Obesity in Cancer Simulation Models," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(2), pages 176-197, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sait Tunç & Oguzhan Alagoz & Elizabeth S. Burnside, 2022. "A new perspective on breast cancer diagnostic guidelines to reduce overdiagnosis," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 2361-2378, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:38:y:2018:i:1_suppl:p:99s-111s. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.