IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v31y2011i5p754-766.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information for Decision Making by Patients With Early-Stage Prostate Cancer

Author

Listed:
  • Deb Feldman-Stewart
  • Carlo Capirci
  • Sarah Brennenstuhl
  • Christine Tong
  • Ufuk Abacioglu
  • Marzena Gawkowska-Suwinska
  • Francis van Gils
  • Alicja Heyda
  • Sefik Igdem
  • Victor Macias
  • Isabel Monteiro Grillo
  • Clare Moynihan
  • Madelon Pijls-Johannesma
  • Chris Parker
  • Nuno Pimentel
  • Herbert Wördehoff

Abstract

Purpose : To describe decisional roles of patients with early-stage prostate cancer in 9 countries and to compare the information they rated important for decision making (DM). Method : A survey of recently treated patients was conducted in Canada, Italy, England, Germany, Poland, Portugal, Netherlands, Spain, and Turkey. Participants indicated their decisional role in their actual decision and the role they would prefer now. Each participant also rated (essential/desired/no opinion/avoid) the importance of obtaining answers, between diagnosis and treatment decision, to each of 92 questions. For each essential/desired question, participants specified all purposes for that information (to help them: understand/decide/plan/not sure/other). Results : A total of 659 patients participated with country-specific response rates between 58%-77%. Between 83%-96% of each country’s participants recalled actually taking an active decisional role and, in most countries, that increased slightly if they were to make the decision today; there were no significant differences among countries. There was a small reliable difference in the mean number of questions rated essential for DM across countries. More striking, however, was the wide variability within each country: no question was rated essential for DM by even 50% of its participants but almost every question was rated essential by some. Conclusions : Almost all participants from each country want to participate in their treatment decisions. Although there are country-specific differences in the amount of information required, wide variation within each country suggests that information that patients feel is essential or desired for DM should be addressed on an individual basis in all countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Deb Feldman-Stewart & Carlo Capirci & Sarah Brennenstuhl & Christine Tong & Ufuk Abacioglu & Marzena Gawkowska-Suwinska & Francis van Gils & Alicja Heyda & Sefik Igdem & Victor Macias & Isabel Monteir, 2011. "Information for Decision Making by Patients With Early-Stage Prostate Cancer," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(5), pages 754-766, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:31:y:2011:i:5:p:754-766
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10395029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X10395029
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X10395029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hoda HM Al‐Itejawi & Cornelia F van Uden‐Kraan & André N Vis & Jakko A Nieuwenhuijzen & Myrna JA Hofstee & Reindert Jeroen A van Moorselaar & Irma M Verdonck‐de Leeuw, 2016. "Development of a patient decision aid for the treatment of localised prostate cancer: a participatory design approach," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(7-8), pages 1131-1144, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:31:y:2011:i:5:p:754-766. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.