IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v30y2010i1p16-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capacity Constraints and Cost-Effectiveness: A Discrete Event Simulation for Drug-Eluting Stents

Author

Listed:
  • Beate Jahn

    (Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Information Systems and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT-University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i.T., Austria and the Department of Medical Statistics Informatics and Health Economics, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria, beate.jahn@umit.at)

  • Karl Peter Pfeiffer

    (Department of Medical Statistics Informatics and Health Economics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria)

  • Engelbert Theurl

    (Department of Public Finance, Leopold-Franzens-University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria)

  • Jean-Eric Tarride

    (Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada)

  • Ron Goeree

    (Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health (PATH) Research Institute, the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada)

Abstract

Background. Waiting times for access to care, for example, for diagnostic imaging or surgery, are a highly relevant issue in health care. Waiting or deferred treatment caused by limited resource capacities can affect treatment success, quality of life, and costs. However, when treatment alternatives are compared in economic models, often unrestricted availability of resources is assumed, and dynamic changes in waiting lines remain unconsidered. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of potential real-world capacity restrictions and implied waiting lines on cost-effectiveness results and additional model outcomes. Methods. A case study of drug-eluting and bare-metal stent treatment illustrates the effect of hypothetical capacity limitations of daily stenting procedures. Therefore, a decision-analytic model which allows for explicitly defined resource capacities and dynamic waiting lines was built using discrete event simulation. Cost-effectiveness, utilization, waiting time, and budgetary impact of alternative treatment scenarios are analyzed under the assumption of limited and unlimited resource capacities. Results. The compared treatment allocation scenarios in the case study demonstrate that the additional cost for waiting increases the average treatment cost per patient. The different scenarios have different impacts on waiting lines because of the number of repeated interventions. Additionally, this effect leads to changes in cost-effectiveness results for the hypothetical capacity limit. Explicitly modeled capacities allow for further analysis of capacity utilization, waiting lines, and budgetary impact. Conclusion. Our model shows that neglected limited capacities can cause wrong cost-effectiveness results. Therefore, capacities should be explicitly included in decision-analytic models if there is evidence of scarcity.

Suggested Citation

  • Beate Jahn & Karl Peter Pfeiffer & Engelbert Theurl & Jean-Eric Tarride & Ron Goeree, 2010. "Capacity Constraints and Cost-Effectiveness: A Discrete Event Simulation for Drug-Eluting Stents," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 30(1), pages 16-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:30:y:2010:i:1:p:16-28
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X09336075
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X09336075
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X09336075?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. J B Jun & S H Jacobson & J R Swisher, 1999. "Application of discrete-event simulation in health care clinics: A survey," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 50(2), pages 109-123, February.
    2. Jonathan Karnon, 2003. "Alternative decision modelling techniques for the evaluation of health care technologies: Markov processes versus discrete event simulation," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 12(10), pages 837-848, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aida Ribera & John Slof & Ignacio Ferreira-González & Vicente Serra & Bruno García-del Blanco & Purificació Cascant & Rut Andrea & Carlos Falces & Enrique Gutiérrez & Raquel del Valle-Fernández & Césa, 2018. "The impact of waiting for intervention on costs and effectiveness: the case of transcatheter aortic valve replacement," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(7), pages 945-956, September.
    2. Beate Jahn & Sarah Friedrich & Joachim Behnke & Joachim Engel & Ursula Garczarek & Ralf Münnich & Markus Pauly & Adalbert Wilhelm & Olaf Wolkenhauer & Markus Zwick & Uwe Siebert & Tim Friede, 2022. "On the role of data, statistics and decisions in a pandemic," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 106(3), pages 349-382, September.
    3. Reda Lebcir & Usame Yakutcan & Eren Demir, 2022. "A decision support tool with health economic modelling for better management of DVT patients," Health Economics Review, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. K Cooper & S C Brailsford & R Davies, 2007. "Choice of modelling technique for evaluating health care interventions," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(2), pages 168-176, February.
    2. Jesús Isaac Vázquez-Serrano & Rodrigo E. Peimbert-García & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón, 2021. "Discrete-Event Simulation Modeling in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-20, November.
    3. H Pilgrim & J Chilcott, 2008. "Assessment of a 7-day turn-around for the reporting of cervical smear results using discrete event simulation," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 59(7), pages 902-910, July.
    4. Bohui Liang & Ayten Turkcan & Mehmet Erkan Ceyhan & Keith Stuart, 2015. "Improvement of chemotherapy patient flow and scheduling in an outpatient oncology clinic," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(24), pages 7177-7190, December.
    5. Topuz, Kazim & Urban, Timothy L. & Yildirim, Mehmet B., 2024. "A Markovian score model for evaluating provider performance for continuity of care—An explainable analytics approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(2), pages 341-351.
    6. Lixiang Jiang & Ronald Giachetti, 2008. "A queueing network model to analyze the impact of parallelization of care on patient cycle time," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 248-261, September.
    7. Hossein Haji Ali Afzali & Jonathan Karnon & Jodi Gray, 2012. "A proposed model for economic evaluations of major depressive disorder," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 13(4), pages 501-510, August.
    8. Mielczarek, Bożena, 2014. "Simulation modelling for contracting hospital emergency services at the regional level," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 287-299.
    9. Eren Demir & Christos Vasilakis & Reda Lebcir & David Southern, 2015. "A simulation-based decision support tool for informing the management of patients with Parkinson’s disease," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(24), pages 7238-7251, December.
    10. Kaya, Onur & Teymourifar, Aydin & Ozturk, Gurkan, 2020. "Analysis of different public policies through simulation to increase total social utility in a healthcare system," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    11. Leslie Anne Campbell & John T. Blake & George Kephart & Eva Grunfeld & Donald MacIntosh, 2017. "Understanding the Effects of Competition for Constrained Colonoscopy Services with the Introduction of Population-level Colorectal Cancer Screening," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 37(2), pages 253-263, February.
    12. Michael Samudra & Carla Van Riet & Erik Demeulemeester & Brecht Cardoen & Nancy Vansteenkiste & Frank E. Rademakers, 2016. "Scheduling operating rooms: achievements, challenges and pitfalls," Journal of Scheduling, Springer, vol. 19(5), pages 493-525, October.
    13. Navonil Mustafee & Korina Katsaliaki & Paul Fishwick, 2014. "Exploring the modelling and simulation knowledge base through journal co-citation analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(3), pages 2145-2159, March.
    14. Yi, Pengfei & George, Santhosh K. & Paul, Jomon Aliyas & Lin, Li, 2010. "Hospital capacity planning for disaster emergency management," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 151-160, September.
    15. Cisnetto, Valentina & Barlow, James, 2020. "The development of complex and controversial innovations. Genetically modified mosquitoes for malaria eradication," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(3).
    16. Schulenburg J.-Matthias Graf von der & Vauth Christoph, 2007. "Nach welchen ökonomischen Methoden sollten Gesundheitsleistungen in Deutschland evaluiert werden? / According to Which Economic Methods Should Health Care Services Become Evaluated in Germany?," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 227(5-6), pages 787-806, October.
    17. Gogi, Anastasia & Tako, Antuela A. & Robinson, Stewart, 2016. "An experimental investigation into the role of simulation models in generating insights," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 931-944.
    18. Matthew J. Glover & Edmund Jones & Katya L. Masconi & Michael J. Sweeting & Simon G. Thompson, 2018. "Discrete Event Simulation for Decision Modeling in Health Care: Lessons from Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Screening," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(4), pages 439-451, May.
    19. Ran Liu & Xiaolan Xie, 2018. "Physician Staffing for Emergency Departments with Time-Varying Demand," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 588-607, August.
    20. R Ceglowski & L Churilov & J Wasserthiel, 2007. "Combining Data Mining and Discrete Event Simulation for a value-added view of a hospital emergency department," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(2), pages 246-254, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:30:y:2010:i:1:p:16-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.