IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v23y2003i4p301-313.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why do Primary Care Physicians in the United States and France Order Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests for Asymptomatic Patients?

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Clay Sorum
  • Junseop Shim
  • Gérard Chasseigne
  • Sylvie Bonnin-Scaon
  • Joël Cogneau
  • Etienne Mullet

Abstract

Purpose. To understand why many primary care physicians in the United States and France order prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests routinely for their asymptomatic male patients despite “evidence-based†recommendations. Methods. Thirty-two U.S. general internists and family practitioners and 33 French generalists judged, for 32 hypothetical male patients seen for routine preventive care, the probability that the patients had asymptomatic prostate cancer and the likelihood that they would order PSA tests. They were also asked about beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge related to prostate cancer. Results. The significant predictors of ordering more PSA tests in the scenarios were physicians' higher ratings of regret if untested patients were found to have advanced cancer, their greater discomfort if they suspected that patients had illnesses but could not know for sure, and their perceptions of official recommendations as favoring routine testing. Implications. Nonrational factors can impede physicians' adoption of “evidence-based†recommendations.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Clay Sorum & Junseop Shim & Gérard Chasseigne & Sylvie Bonnin-Scaon & Joël Cogneau & Etienne Mullet, 2003. "Why do Primary Care Physicians in the United States and France Order Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests for Asymptomatic Patients?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 23(4), pages 301-313, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:23:y:2003:i:4:p:301-313
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X03256010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X03256010
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X03256010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Epstein, A.M. & Begg, C.B. & McNeil, B.J., 1984. "The effects of physicians' training and personality on test ordering for ambulatory patients," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 74(11), pages 1271-1273.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tritter, Jonathan Q. & Lutfey, Karen & McKinlay, John, 2014. "What are tests for? The implications of stuttering steps along the US patient pathway," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 37-43.
    2. repec:cup:judgdm:v:1:y:2006:i::p:134-145 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Michael L. DeKay & John C. Hershey & Mark D. Spranca, & Peter A. Ubel & David A. Asch, 2006. "Are medical treatments for individuals and groups like single-play and multiple-play gambles?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 1, pages 134-145, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sophie Massin & Antoine Nebout & Bruno Ventelou, 2018. "Predicting medical practices using various risk attitude measures," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(6), pages 843-860, July.
    2. N/A, 1987. "Editorials," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 7(3), pages 136-137, August.
    3. Arnold M. Epstein & Barbara J. McNeil, 1985. "Physician Characteristics and Organizational Factors Influencing Use of Ambulatory Tests," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 5(4), pages 401-415, December.
    4. Tinglong Dai & Shubhranshu Singh, 2020. "Conspicuous by Its Absence: Diagnostic Expert Testing Under Uncertainty," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 540-563, May.
    5. David R. Holtgrave & Frank Lawler & Stephen J. Spann, 1991. "Physicians' Risk Attitudes, Laboratory Usage, and Referral Decisions," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 11(2), pages 125-130, June.
    6. Scott, Anthony & Shiell, Alan, 1997. "Do fee descriptors influence treatment choices in general practice? A multilevel discrete choice model," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 323-342, June.
    7. Jeroan J. Allison & Catarina I. Kiefe & E. Francis Cook & Martha S. Gerrity & E. John Orav & Robert Centor, 1998. "The Association of Physician Attitudes about Uncertainty and Risk Taking with Resource Use in a Medicare HMO," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 18(3), pages 320-329, August.
    8. Anthony Scott & Alan Shiell, 1997. "Analysing the effect of competition on General Practitioners' behaviour using a multilevel modelling framework," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(6), pages 577-588, November.
    9. Paul R. Yarnold & Stephen D. Nightingale & Raymond H. Curry & Gary J. Martin, 1990. "Psychological Androgyny and Preference for Intubation in a Nypothetical Case of End-stage Lung Disease," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 10(3), pages 215-222, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:23:y:2003:i:4:p:301-313. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.