IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v10y1990i3p215-222.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychological Androgyny and Preference for Intubation in a Nypothetical Case of End-stage Lung Disease

Author

Listed:
  • Paul R. Yarnold
  • Stephen D. Nightingale
  • Raymond H. Curry
  • Gary J. Martin

Abstract

Psychological androgyny theory (PAT) was employed as a model of the interpersonal (social) and task activities required of physicians for care of their patients. According to PAT, indi viduals with a large repertoire of task and social skills ("androgynous" individuals) should be optimally adaptable to contingencies reflecting varying combinations of task and social challenges. The authors examined the relationship between androgyny and preference for intubation on a patient management problem involving end-stage lung disease for 67 general internists and internal medicine housestaff from two hosptials. Results revealed a negative relationship between androgyny and preference for intubation, suggesting that androgynous and nonandrogynous physicians respond differently to complex and difficult decision-making tasks. Indirect evidence is offered to suggest that this response reflects a general tendency to utilize fewer health care resources. Discussion focuses on the need to improve the pre cision of measurement of these latent constructs. Key words: androgyny; critical care; health care; resource use. (Med Decis Making 1990;10:215-222)

Suggested Citation

  • Paul R. Yarnold & Stephen D. Nightingale & Raymond H. Curry & Gary J. Martin, 1990. "Psychological Androgyny and Preference for Intubation in a Nypothetical Case of End-stage Lung Disease," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 10(3), pages 215-222, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:10:y:1990:i:3:p:215-222
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9001000309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9001000309
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9001000309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Epstein, A.M. & Begg, C.B. & McNeil, B.J., 1984. "The effects of physicians' training and personality on test ordering for ambulatory patients," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 74(11), pages 1271-1273.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sophie Massin & Antoine Nebout & Bruno Ventelou, 2018. "Predicting medical practices using various risk attitude measures," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 19(6), pages 843-860, July.
    2. N/A, 1987. "Editorials," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 7(3), pages 136-137, August.
    3. Arnold M. Epstein & Barbara J. McNeil, 1985. "Physician Characteristics and Organizational Factors Influencing Use of Ambulatory Tests," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 5(4), pages 401-415, December.
    4. Paul Clay Sorum & Junseop Shim & Gérard Chasseigne & Sylvie Bonnin-Scaon & Joël Cogneau & Etienne Mullet, 2003. "Why do Primary Care Physicians in the United States and France Order Prostate-Specific Antigen Tests for Asymptomatic Patients?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 23(4), pages 301-313, July.
    5. Tinglong Dai & Shubhranshu Singh, 2020. "Conspicuous by Its Absence: Diagnostic Expert Testing Under Uncertainty," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 540-563, May.
    6. David R. Holtgrave & Frank Lawler & Stephen J. Spann, 1991. "Physicians' Risk Attitudes, Laboratory Usage, and Referral Decisions," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 11(2), pages 125-130, June.
    7. Scott, Anthony & Shiell, Alan, 1997. "Do fee descriptors influence treatment choices in general practice? A multilevel discrete choice model," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3), pages 323-342, June.
    8. Jeroan J. Allison & Catarina I. Kiefe & E. Francis Cook & Martha S. Gerrity & E. John Orav & Robert Centor, 1998. "The Association of Physician Attitudes about Uncertainty and Risk Taking with Resource Use in a Medicare HMO," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 18(3), pages 320-329, August.
    9. Anthony Scott & Alan Shiell, 1997. "Analysing the effect of competition on General Practitioners' behaviour using a multilevel modelling framework," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(6), pages 577-588, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:10:y:1990:i:3:p:215-222. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.