IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v22y2002i3p208-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reduction Mammaplasty: Defining Medical Necessity

Author

Listed:
  • Carolyn L. Kerrigan

    (Section of Plastic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire, Arizona)

  • E. Dale Collins

    (Section of Plastic Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire, Arizona)

  • H. Myra Kim

    (Center for Statistical Consultation and Research, Arizona)

  • Paul L. Schnur

    (Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona)

  • Edwin Wilkins

    (Section of Plastic Surgery, University of Michigan Health System, Arizona)

  • Bruce Cunningham

    (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor; the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Arizona)

  • Julie Lowery

    (Veterans Affairs Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Arizona)

Abstract

The authors evaluated existing and new criteria for defining the medical necessity for breast reduction surgery. Two cohorts of women (those requesting breast reduction surgery [ N = 266] and a group of controls [ N = 184]) completed a questionnaire including breast-specific symptom severity, the Short Form 36, the EuroQol, the McGill Pain Questionnaire, and the Multidimensional Body Self Relations Questionnaire. To evaluate prediction validity, the most widely accepted decision criteria and a new definition of medical necessity were applied to the data set to determine whether women meeting the definition had more favorable outcomes than those who did not as measured by validated self-report instruments. For existing criteria, women not meeting and meeting the criterion gained equal benefit from surgery. Women meeting the new definition (2 of 7 physical symptoms all or most of the time) had significantly greater improvement scores on 4 of the 5 health burden measures compared to women not meeting this definition. The authors conclude that medical necessity for breast reduction surgery is better defined by self-report of symptoms than by existing criteria.

Suggested Citation

  • Carolyn L. Kerrigan & E. Dale Collins & H. Myra Kim & Paul L. Schnur & Edwin Wilkins & Bruce Cunningham & Julie Lowery, 2002. "Reduction Mammaplasty: Defining Medical Necessity," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 22(3), pages 208-217, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:22:y:2002:i:3:p:208-217
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X0202200309
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X0202200309
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X0202200309?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katz, J.N. & Punnett, L. & Simmons, B.P. & Fossel, A.H. & Mooney, N. & Keller, R.B., 1996. "Workers' compensation recipients with carpal tunnel syndrome: The validity of self-reported health measures," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 86(1), pages 52-56.
    2. Butler, Richard J & Durbin, David L & Helvacian, Nurhan M, 1996. "Increasing Claims for Soft Tissue Injuries in Workers' Compensation: Cost Shifting and Moral Hazard," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 73-87, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dionne, Georges, 1998. "La mesure empirique des problèmes d’information," L'Actualité Economique, Société Canadienne de Science Economique, vol. 74(4), pages 585-606, décembre.
    2. Michele Campolieti, 2002. "The recurrence of occupational injuries: estimates from a zero inflated count model," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(9), pages 595-600.
    3. Bande, Roberto & López-Mourelo, Elva, 2014. "The spatial distribution of workplace accidents in Spain: assessing the role of workplace inspections," MPRA Paper 56767, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Sebastian Soika, 2018. "Moral Hazard and Advantageous Selection in Private Disability Insurance," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(1), pages 97-125, January.
    5. Michele Campolieti, 2002. "Moral Hazard and Disability Insurance: On the Incidence of Hard-to-Diagnose Medical Conditions in the Canada/Quebec Pension Plan Disability Program," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 28(3), pages 419-441, September.
    6. Krueger, Alan B. & Meyer, Bruce D., 2002. "Labor supply effects of social insurance," Handbook of Public Economics, in: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (ed.), Handbook of Public Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 33, pages 2327-2392, Elsevier.
    7. Georges Dionne & Robert Gagné, 2001. "Deductible Contracts Against Fraudulent Claims: Evidence From Automobile Insurance," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 83(2), pages 290-301, May.
    8. Dionne, Georges & Gagne, Robert, 2002. "Replacement Cost Endorsement and Opportunistic Fraud in Automobile Insurance," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 213-230, May.
    9. Ángel Martín-Román & Alfonso Moral, 2017. "A methodological proposal to evaluate the cost of duration moral hazard in workplace accident insurance," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 18(9), pages 1181-1198, December.
    10. Dionne, Georges, 2012. "The empirical measure of information problems with emphasis on insurance fraud and dynamic data," Working Papers 12-10, HEC Montreal, Canada Research Chair in Risk Management.
    11. Dionne, G., 2000. "The Empirical Measure of Information Problems with Emphasis on Insurance Fraud," Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales de Montreal- 00-04, Ecole des Hautes Etudes Commerciales de Montreal-Chaire de gestion des risques..
    12. Fortin, Bernard & Lanoie, Paul, 1998. "Effects of Workers' Compensation: A Survey," Cahiers de recherche 9816, Université Laval - Département d'économique.
    13. Geetha M. Waehrer & Ted R. Miller, 2003. "Restricted Work, Workers’ Compensation, and Days Away from Work," Journal of Human Resources, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 38(4).
    14. Michele Campolieti & John N. Lavis, 2000. "Disability Expenditures in Canada, 1970-1996: Trends, Reform Efforts and a Path for the Future," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 26(2), pages 241-164, June.
    15. Hansen, Benjamin & Nguyen, Tuan & Waddell, Glen R., 2017. "Benefit Generosity and Injury Duration: Quasi-Experimental Evidence from Regression Kinks," IZA Discussion Papers 10621, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. James Langenbucher & Jeffrey Merrill, 2001. "The Validity of Self-Reported Cost Events by Substance Abusers," Evaluation Review, , vol. 25(2), pages 184-210, April.
    17. Hunsoo Kim & W. Jean Kwon, 2006. "A Multi‐Line Insurance Fraud Recognition System: A Government‐Led Approach in Korea," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 9(2), pages 131-147, September.
    18. Tan, Ken Seng & Wei, Pengyu & Wei, Wei & Zhuang, Sheng Chao, 2020. "Optimal dynamic reinsurance policies under a generalized Denneberg’s absolute deviation principle," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(1), pages 345-362.
    19. Askenazy, Philippe, 2006. "Some determinants of reporting workplace accidents in France: The role of labour contract," CEPREMAP Working Papers (Docweb) 0603, CEPREMAP.
    20. Stijn Viaene & Guido Dedene, 2004. "Insurance Fraud: Issues and Challenges," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 29(2), pages 313-333, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:22:y:2002:i:3:p:208-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.