IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/medema/v19y1999i3p287-295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of Focus Groups to Identify Concerns about Dialysis

Author

Listed:
  • Eric B. Bass
  • Mollie W. Jenckes
  • Nancy E. Fink
  • Kate A. Cagney
  • Albert W. Wu
  • John H. Sadler
  • Klemens B. Meyer
  • Andrews. Levey
  • Neil R. Powe

Abstract

Background . Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) may have quality-of-life (QOL) concerns that are not fully appreciated by their providers. The authors con ducted focus groups with dialysis patients and dialysis professionals to determine whether this qualitative method would reveal differences between patients' and provid ers' views about: 1) domains of QOL that are affected by ESRD and dialysis; and 2) aspects of dialysis that affect QOL. Methods . Separate focus group discussions were held with: 8 adult hemodialysis patients (mean age 50 years; 3 women; mean duration of dialysis 8.5 years), 5 adult peritoneal dialysis patients (mean age 54 years; 3 women; mean duration of dialysis 4.6 years), 8 nephrologists (mean of 12 years of dialysis practice), and 9 other health professionals involved in dialysis care (3 nurses, 2 dieti tians, 2 social workers, and 2 technicians; mean of 10 years experience in dialysis care). Discussions were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and reviewed independently by three investigators to identify and categorize distinct thoughts. Results . 1,271 dis tinct thoughts were identified and grouped into 20 related categories, which included ten QOL domains and ten aspects of dialysis that affect QOL. Compared with the professionals, the patients identified one additional relevant QOL domain (10 vs 9), and one additional aspect of dialysis that affects QOL (10 vs 9), and expressed more thoughts per domain (p

Suggested Citation

  • Eric B. Bass & Mollie W. Jenckes & Nancy E. Fink & Kate A. Cagney & Albert W. Wu & John H. Sadler & Klemens B. Meyer & Andrews. Levey & Neil R. Powe, 1999. "Use of Focus Groups to Identify Concerns about Dialysis," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 19(3), pages 287-295, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:3:p:287-295
    DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9901900307
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0272989X9901900307
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0272989X9901900307?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheryl Glover & Pauline Banks & Amanda Carson & Colin Martin & Tim Duffy, 2011. "Understanding and Assessing the Impact of End-Stage Renal Disease on Quality of Life," The Patient: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Springer;International Academy of Health Preference Research, vol. 4(1), pages 19-30, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:medema:v:19:y:1999:i:3:p:287-295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.