IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/loceco/v38y2023i4p347-368.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does culture have transformative power to make the Olympic Games sustainable?

Author

Listed:
  • Cécile Doustaly

Abstract

Public aspirations for more sustainable mega-projects not only ensuring economic returns but also comprehensive local legacies have increased in recent years. The Olympic Games in particular have been criticized as commercial ventures lacking in proportional impacts for local communities, while largely financed by public funds. With associated corruption and gentrification concerns, such projects met with increased opposition. The International Olympic Committee (IOC), struggling to attract candidate cities, adapted its strategies and frameworks, while host cities’ priorities were better heeded. Cultural policy, associated with transformative urban powers since the 1990s, became instrumental to sustainable legacies. This article explores the increased use of cultural value, from heritage to creation, as part of the Olympic Games, to reach more sustainable cultural, socio-economic, political, and environmental objectives. Can cultural planning and programming (notably Cultural Olympiads) help provide a more sustainable legacy to the redeveloped areas and their communities? Can culture also impact the Olympic project through its use of sustainable management methods (consultation, participation, co-creation, etc.)? After discussing evolving theories and practices around sustainability, legacy, and cultural policy in the Olympic context, this article analyzes the cases of London 2012 and Paris 2024 and their Athletes’ village areas (Stratford and Plaine Commune).

Suggested Citation

  • Cécile Doustaly, 2023. "Does culture have transformative power to make the Olympic Games sustainable?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(4), pages 347-368, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:38:y:2023:i:4:p:347-368
    DOI: 10.1177/02690942231213603
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/02690942231213603
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/02690942231213603?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Allen & Allan Cochrane, 2014. "The Urban Unbound: London's Politics and the 2012 Olympic Games," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1609-1624, September.
    2. Nicholas Wise & Geoff Whittam, 2015. "Special edition: Regeneration, enterprise, sport and tourism," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 30(8), pages 867-870, December.
    3. Pappalepore, Ilaria & Duignan, Michael B., 2016. "The London 2012 cultural programme: A consideration of Olympic impacts and legacies for small creative organisations in east London," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 344-355.
    4. John R. Gold, 2023. "State of the legacy: reviewing a decade of writings on the regeneration promises of London 2012," Planning Perspectives, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 724-726, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Goh, Sandra & Ryan, Chris & Faisal, Abrar & Qi, Hongxia, 2022. "Mega events, disruptions, and arts entrepreneurs: Reconceptualising the creative transformation of urban spaces," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Scott Rodgers & Clive Barnett & Allan Cochrane, 2014. "Where is Urban Politics?," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1551-1560, September.
    3. John Lauermann & Anne Vogelpohl, 2017. "Fragile growth coalitions or powerful contestations? Cancelled Olympic bids in Boston and Hamburg," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 49(8), pages 1887-1904, August.
    4. Robert J Rogerson & Bob Giddings, 2021. "The future of the city centre: Urbanisation, transformation and resilience – a tale of two Newcastle cities," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(10), pages 1967-1982, August.
    5. Roger Keil & Jean-Paul D. Addie, 2015. "‘It's Not Going to be Suburban, It's Going to be All Urban’: Assembling Post-suburbia in the Toronto and Chicago Regions," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(5), pages 892-911, September.
    6. Wannipa Koodsela & Huang Dong & Kassara Sukpatch, 2019. "A Holistic Conceptual Framework into Practice-Based on Urban Tourism Toward Sustainable Development in Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-28, December.
    7. Erik Jönsson, 2016. "Trump in Scotland: A Study of Power-Topologies and Golf Topographies," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 559-577, May.
    8. Duignan, M.B. & Down, S. & O'Brien, D., 2020. "Entrepreneurial leveraging in liminoidal olympic transit zones," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    9. Pascal Ricordel & Geoff Whittam & Nicholas Wise, 2023. "Editorial: Sports, politics and legacy: Building back better?," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 38(4), pages 303-305, June.
    10. Sophie Gonick, 2016. "From Occupation to Recuperation: Property, Politics and Provincialization in Contemporary Madrid," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(4), pages 833-848, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:loceco:v:38:y:2023:i:4:p:347-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/index.shtml .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.