IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/jousus/v12y2018i2p176-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Game-based Learning to Facilitate Attitude Change for Environmental Sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Shamila Janakiraman
  • Sunnie Lee Watson
  • William R. Watson

Abstract

Environmental Sustainability Education (ESE) is a critical element in youth education, as it facilitates learners to understand and realize the importance of creating a sustainable future for themselves and others. Changing learner attitudes and related behaviours is critical in ESE. Digital game-based learning (DGBL) environments offer a suitable pedagogical tool for ESE, as they enable youth to learn and test their behaviours within the game. This literature review looks at studies that examine the efficacy of games as a pedagogical tool for producing change in attitudes and behaviours regarding environmental sustainability. While there are limited longitudinal studies that test whether learners retained their environment-friendly behaviours over time, which highlights the need for more such research; existing studies do show that games have demonstrated the potential for producing attitudinal change.

Suggested Citation

  • Shamila Janakiraman & Sunnie Lee Watson & William R. Watson, 2018. "Using Game-based Learning to Facilitate Attitude Change for Environmental Sustainability," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 12(2), pages 176-185, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:jousus:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:176-185
    DOI: 10.1177/0973408218783286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0973408218783286
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0973408218783286?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Tucker & David Speirs, 2003. "Attitudes and Behavioural Change in Household Waste Management Behaviours," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 289-307.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kua, H.W. & Wong, S.E., 2012. "Lessons for integrated household energy conservation policies from an intervention study in Singapore," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 49-56.
    2. Lyas, Joanne K. & Shaw, Peter J. & van Vugt, Mark, 2005. "Kerbside recycling in the London Borough of Havering: progress and priorities," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 1-17.
    3. Elena Cristina Rada & Chiara Bresciani & Eleonora Girelli & Marco Ragazzi & Marco Schiavon & Vincenzo Torretta, 2016. "Analysis and Measures to Improve Waste Management in Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Shaw, Peter J., 2008. "Nearest neighbour effects in kerbside household waste recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(5), pages 775-784.
    5. Read, Mike & Gregory, Marten K. & Phillips, Paul S., 2009. "An evaluation of four key methods for monitoring household waste prevention campaigns in the UK," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 9-20.
    6. Alan Collins & Richard O'Doherty & Martin Snell, 2006. "Household participation in waste recycling: Some national survey evidence from Scotland," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(1), pages 121-140.
    7. Vasile Gherheș & Gabriel-Mugurel Dragomir & Mariana Cernicova-Buca & Adina Palea, 2024. "Enhancing Sustainability in University Campuses: A Study on Solid Waste Generation and Disposal Practices among Students in Politehnica University Timisoara, Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-28, August.
    8. Andrew Gilg & Stewart Barr, 2005. "Encouraging 'Environmental Action' by Exhortation: Evidence from a Study in Devon," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(4), pages 593-618.
    9. Lang, Daniel J. & Binder, Claudia R. & Stauffacher, Michael & Ziegler, Christian & Schleiss, Konrad & Scholz, Roland W., 2006. "Material and money flows as a means for industry analysis of recycling schemes," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 49(2), pages 159-190.
    10. Anna Scott & Caroline Oates & William Young, 2015. "A Conceptual Framework of the Adoption and Practice of Environmental Actions in Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-26, May.
    11. Lang, Daniel J. & Binder, Claudia R. & Scholz, Roland W. & Schleiss, Konrad & Stäubli, Beat, 2006. "Impact factors and regulatory mechanisms for material flow management: Integrating stakeholder and scientific perspectives," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 101-132.
    12. Yelena Popova & Ilze Sproge, 2021. "Decision-Making within Smart City: Waste Sorting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-15, September.
    13. Mani Nepal & Apsara Karki Nepal & Madan S. Khadayat & Rajesh K. Rai & Priya Shyamsundar & E. Somanathan, 2023. "Low-Cost Strategies to Improve Municipal Solid Waste Management in Developing Countries: Experimental Evidence from Nepal," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(3), pages 729-752, March.
    14. López-Mosquera, Natalia & Lera-López, Fernando & Sánchez, Mercedes, 2015. "Key factors to explain recycling, car use and environmentally responsible purchase behaviors: A comparative perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 29-39.
    15. Shaw, Peter J. & Lyas, Joanne K. & Hudson, Malcolm D., 2006. "Quantitative analysis of recyclable materials composition: Tools to support decision making in kerbside recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 48(3), pages 263-279.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:jousus:v:12:y:2018:i:2:p:176-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.