IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v61y2024i1p3-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Introduction: Cyber-conflict – Moving from speculation to investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan Shandler

    (Georgia Institute of Technology, USA)

  • Daphna Canetti

    (School of Political Sciences, University of Haifa, Israel)

Abstract

Investigating cyber conflict is enormously difficult. The domain is complex, quality data are sparse, international affairs are shrouded in secrecy, and despite its seeming ubiquity, cyber power has only recently entered the battlefield. In the face of these challenges, we must rise to meet the challenges of cybersecurity research by deploying creative methods that collect verifiable and probatory data, and which allow for predictive models of cyber behavior. Against this backdrop, our special issue offers a vision of cybersecurity research that embraces a culture of rigorous inquiry based on theoretically robust, and policy relevant investigation. We highlight two key features. First, research at the intersection of cybersecurity and political science must incorporate the human dimension of cyber conflict. A human security approach to cybersecurity places people as the primary objects of security and recognizes that individual-level analyses can shed light on macro-level trends. Second, cyber research must adopt rigorous, empirical methods. We embrace a broad tent of empirical data collection techniques – spanning qualitative and quantitative, experimental, and observational research. What is integral is that all scholarship abides by the highest standards of replicability and falsifiability. The articles contained in this special issue collectively form a proof of concept that expands the horizons of cybersecurity research from a substantive viewpoint (adding a human dimension to the prevalent military/strategic analyses), and from a methodological perspective (propounding the importance of empirical scrutiny). Together, these 10 pieces of scholarship collectively affirm that there is now a critical mass of substantively diverse and empirically rigorous research in the field of cybersecurity, and that we as a community are capable of making bold, theoretically grounded, and empirically tested claims that verify how cyber power is or is not altering the nature of peace, conflict and international relations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan Shandler & Daphna Canetti, 2024. "Introduction: Cyber-conflict – Moving from speculation to investigation," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 3-9, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:61:y:2024:i:1:p:3-9
    DOI: 10.1177/00223433231219441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00223433231219441
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00223433231219441?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nadiya Kostyuk, 2024. "Allies and diffusion of state military cybercapacity," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 44-58, January.
    2. Justin Key Canfil, 2024. "Until consensus: Introducing the International Cyber Expression dataset," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 150-159, January.
    3. Christos Makridis & Lennart Maschmeyer & Max Smeets, 2024. "If it bleeps it leads? Media coverage on cyber conflict and misperception," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 72-86, January.
    4. Nye, Joseph S., 2011. "Nuclear Lessons for Cyber Security?," Scholarly Articles 8052146, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    5. Branch, Jordan, 2021. "What's in a Name? Metaphors and Cybersecurity," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(1), pages 39-70, January.
    6. William Akoto, 2024. "Who spies on whom? Unravelling the puzzle of state-sponsored cyber economic espionage," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 59-71, January.
    7. Harry Oppenheimer, 2024. "How the process of discovering cyberattacks biases our understanding of cybersecurity," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 28-43, January.
    8. Jelena Vićić & Erik Gartzke, 2024. "Cyber-enabled influence operations as a ‘center of gravity’ in cyberconflict: The example of Russian foreign interference in the 2016 US federal election," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 10-27, January.
    9. Shandler, Ryan & Gross, Michael L. & Backhaus, Sophia & Canetti, Daphna, 2022. "Cyber Terrorism and Public Support for Retaliation – A Multi-Country Survey Experiment," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 52(2), pages 850-868, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Justin Key Canfil, 2024. "Until consensus: Introducing the International Cyber Expression dataset," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 150-159, January.
    2. Christos Makridis & Lennart Maschmeyer & Max Smeets, 2024. "If it bleeps it leads? Media coverage on cyber conflict and misperception," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 72-86, January.
    3. Benjamin Jensen & Brandon Valeriano & Sam Whitt, 2024. "How cyber operations can reduce escalation pressures: Evidence from an experimental wargame study," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 119-133, January.
    4. Nadiya Kostyuk, 2024. "Allies and diffusion of state military cybercapacity," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 44-58, January.
    5. Harry Oppenheimer, 2024. "How the process of discovering cyberattacks biases our understanding of cybersecurity," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 28-43, January.
    6. Amelia C Arsenault & Sarah E Kreps & Keren LG Snider & Daphna Canetti, 2024. "Cyber scares and prophylactic policies: Crossnational evidence on the effect of cyberattacks on public support for surveillance," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(3), pages 413-428, May.
    7. Eric Jardine & Nathaniel Porter & Ryan Shandler, 2024. "Cyberattacks and public opinion – The effect of uncertainty in guiding preferences," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 103-118, January.
    8. Straub, Jeremy, 2019. "Mutual assured destruction in information, influence and cyber warfare: Comparing, contrasting and combining relevant scenarios," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    9. Straub, Jeremy, 2016. "Consideration of the use of autonomous, non-recallable unmanned vehicles and programs as a deterrent or threat by state actors and others," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 39-47.
    10. William Akoto, 2024. "Who spies on whom? Unravelling the puzzle of state-sponsored cyber economic espionage," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 59-71, January.
    11. Jon R Lindsay, 2024. "Abducted by hackers: Using the case of Bletchley Park to construct a theory of intelligence performance that generalizes to cybersecurity," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 87-102, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:61:y:2024:i:1:p:3-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.