IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v47y2010i2p243-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How and when armed conflicts end: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination dataset

Author

Listed:
  • Joakim Kreutz

    (Uppsala Conflict Data Program, Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University)

Abstract

This article presents new data on the start and end dates and the means of termination for armed conflicts, 1946-2005. These data contribute to quantitative research on conflict resolution and recurrence in three important respects: the data cover both interstate and intrastate armed conflicts, the data cover low-intensity conflicts, and the data provide information on a broad range of termination outcomes. In order to disaggregate the UCDP-PRIO Armed Conflict dataset into multiple analytical units, this dataset introduces the concept of conflict episodes, defined as years of continuous use of armed force in a conflict. Using these data, general trends and patterns are presented, showing that conflicts do not exclusively end with decisive outcomes such as victory or peace agreement but more often under unclear circumstances where fighting simply ceases. This pattern is consistent across different types of conflict, as is the finding that victories are more common in conflicts with short duration. The article then examines some factors that have been found to predict civil war recurrence and explores whether using the new dataset produces similar results. This exercise offers a number of interesting new insights and finds that the determinants for civil war recurrence identified in previous research are sensitive to alternate formulations of conflict termination data. The findings suggest that intrastate conflicts are less likely to recur after government victories or after the deployment of peacekeepers. If the previous conflict is fought with rebels aiming for total control over government or if the belligerents mobilized along ethnic lines, the risk of recurrence increases. The discrepancy in findings with previous research indicates the need for further study of conflict resolution and recurrence, for which this dataset will be useful.

Suggested Citation

  • Joakim Kreutz, 2010. "How and when armed conflicts end: Introducing the UCDP Conflict Termination dataset," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 47(2), pages 243-250, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:47:y:2010:i:2:p:243-250
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/47/2/243.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bussmann Margit & Dorussen Han & Gleditsch Nils Petter, 2014. "Against All Odds: 2013 Richardson Award to Mats Hammarström and Peter Wallensteen," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(2), pages 235-243, April.
    2. Arnab Biswas & Colin O’Reilly & James T. Bang & Aniruddha Mitra, 2016. "Civil war and economic growth: the case for a closer look at forms of mobilization," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(15), pages 1057-1061, October.
    3. Kıbrıs Arzu & Kıbrıs Özgür, 2016. "On the Dynamics of Extremist Violence," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 22(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Joakim Kreutz, 2012. "From Tremors to Talks: Do Natural Disasters Produce Ripe Moments for Resolving Separatist Conflicts?," International Interactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(4), pages 482-502, September.
    5. Marie-Pier Joly, 2019. "The Employment and Occupational Status of Migrants from Countries Experiencing Armed Conflict," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1071-1095, November.
    6. Dominic Rohner, 2018. "Success Factors for Peace Treaties: A Review of Theory and Evidence," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 18.08, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
    7. Bussmann Margit & Ranft Florian, 2016. "Distribution of Military Power and Prospects of Post-Conflict Peace," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 22(4), pages 385-392, December.
    8. Kurtenbach, Sabine, 2011. "State-Building, War and Violence: Evidence from Latin America," GIGA Working Papers 181, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies.
    9. Julie Christensen & Darius Onul & Prakarsh Singh, 2018. "Impact of Ethnic Civil Conflict on Migration of Skilled Labor," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 44(1), pages 18-29, January.
    10. Garriga, Ana Carolina & Phillips, Brian John, 2014. "Foreign Aid as a Signal to Investors: Predicting FDI in Post-Conflict Countries," MPRA Paper 88643, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:47:y:2010:i:2:p:243-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.