IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joupea/v43y2006i5p523-541.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Uses of Economic Interdependence: Engagement Policies on the Korean Peninsula and Across the Taiwan Strait

Author

Listed:
  • Miles Kahler

    (Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies, University of California, San Diego, mkahler@ucsd.edu)

  • Scott L. Kastner

    (Department of Government and Politics, University of Maryland, skastner@gvpt.umd.edu)

Abstract

While the determinants and effectiveness of economic sanctions have been the subject of a substantial and growing literature in international relations, much less attention has been given to economic engagement strategies, where a country deliberately expands economic ties with an adversary to change the target’s behavior. This article develops a theoretical framework that distinguishes between three types of engagement strategies: conditional policies that directly link economic ties to changed behavior in the target state; unconditional policies where economic interdependence is meant to act as a constraint on the behavior of the target state; and unconditional policies where economic interdependence is meant to effect a transformation in the foreign policy goals of the target state. The article presents several hypotheses concerning the conditions facilitating or hindering the successful implementation of these different strategies, and then examines engagement policies adopted by three East Asian states: South Korea, Taiwan, and mainland China. The cases offer preliminary confirmation of at least three of the hypotheses: conditional strategies are less likely to succeed when the initiating state is a democracy; transformative strategies are more likely to succeed when the target state is a democracy; and transformative strategies are more likely to succeed when a broad consensus exists in the initiating state.

Suggested Citation

  • Miles Kahler & Scott L. Kastner, 2006. "Strategic Uses of Economic Interdependence: Engagement Policies on the Korean Peninsula and Across the Taiwan Strait," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 43(5), pages 523-541, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:43:y:2006:i:5:p:523-541
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jpr.sagepub.com/content/43/5/523.abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Aidoo & Steve Hess, 2015. "Non-Interference 2.0: China’s Evolving Foreign Policy towards a Changing Africa," Journal of Current Chinese Affairs - China aktuell, Institute of Asian Studies, GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, vol. 44(1), pages 107-139.
    2. Roberto Antonietti & Jasmine Mondolo, 2018. "Does inward FDI influence the quality of domestic institutions? A cross-country panel analysis," Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG) 1842, Utrecht University, Department of Human Geography and Spatial Planning, Group Economic Geography, revised Dec 2018.
    3. Ramon Pacheco Pardo, 2018. "Europe’s financial security and Chinese economic statecraft: the case of the Belt and Road Initiative," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 237-250, September.
    4. James Reilly, 2017. "China’s economic statecraft in Europe," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 173-185, June.
    5. T.J. Pempel, 2011. "Reducing Security Tensions in Northeast Asia: Lessons from Economics and Institutions," Chapters, in: Jehoon Park & T. J. Pempel & Heungchong Kim (ed.), Regionalism, Economic Integration and Security in Asia, chapter 9, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joupea:v:43:y:2006:i:5:p:523-541. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.prio.no/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.