IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v19y2022i1p107-121.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Agent-based target evaluation and fire doctrine: an aspect-oriented programming view

Author

Listed:
  • Mehmet Fatih HocaoÄŸlu

Abstract

Threat evaluation is a vital process for any defense system, and it consists of a series of calculation and evaluation based on the inferred capabilities and intents of the targets that aim to give damage to defended assets. Target evaluation is proceeded in a wargame and the aim is to compare weapon target pairs according to a set of criteria. The target evaluation cycle is repeated anytime a new detection is received and when any change happens in the target currently detected. The whole process consists of a set of tasks that are shared between Command and Control units and the tasks require different responsibilities. Each task is succeeded by a specific behavior that is represented as a reasonably ordered set of actions. The task sharing is organized by taking the C2 architectures into account. In this paper, an agent-based command and control entity, which is in charge of target evaluation and giving engagement decision, is designed and it is situated in an air defense simulation environment. The study aims to propose an agent design in military decision-making domain, bringing analytic methods with the first-order logic together, and combine aspect orientation with agent design. The study also improves dynamic aspect management in agent programming using the relation concept.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehmet Fatih HocaoÄŸlu, 2022. "Agent-based target evaluation and fire doctrine: an aspect-oriented programming view," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 19(1), pages 107-121, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:19:y:2022:i:1:p:107-121
    DOI: 10.1177/15485129211040369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/15485129211040369
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/15485129211040369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yi-zhe Chang & Zhan-wu Li & Ying-xin Kou & Qing-peng Sun & Hai-yan Yang & Zheng-yan Zhao, 2017. "A New Approach to Weapon-Target Assignment in Cooperative Air Combat," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2017, pages 1-17, October.
    2. Ravindra K. Ahuja & Arvind Kumar & Krishna C. Jha & James B. Orlin, 2007. "Exact and Heuristic Algorithms for the Weapon-Target Assignment Problem," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 55(6), pages 1136-1146, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chan Y. Han & Brian J. Lunday & Matthew J. Robbins, 2016. "A Game Theoretic Model for the Optimal Location of Integrated Air Defense System Missile Batteries," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 28(3), pages 405-416, August.
    2. Gebrail Bekdaş & Celal Cakiroglu & Sanghun Kim & Zong Woo Geem, 2023. "Optimal Dimensions of Post-Tensioned Concrete Cylindrical Walls Using Harmony Search and Ensemble Learning with SHAP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Cihan Çetinkaya & Samer Haffar, 2018. "A Risk-Based Location-Allocation Approach for Weapon Logistics," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-15, May.
    4. Gülpınar, Nalan & Çanakoğlu, Ethem & Branke, Juergen, 2018. "Heuristics for the stochastic dynamic task-resource allocation problem with retry opportunities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(1), pages 291-303.
    5. Ahmet Silav & Esra Karasakal & Orhan Karasakal, 2022. "Bi-objective dynamic weapon-target assignment problem with stability measure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 311(2), pages 1229-1247, April.
    6. Ahmet Silav & Orhan Karasakal & Esra Karasakal, 2019. "Bi‐objective missile rescheduling for a naval task group with dynamic disruptions," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 66(7), pages 596-615, October.
    7. Juan Li & Bin Xin & Panos M. Pardalos & Jie Chen, 2021. "Solving bi-objective uncertain stochastic resource allocation problems by the CVaR-based risk measure and decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 639-666, January.
    8. Alexander G. Kline & Darryl K. Ahner & Brian J. Lunday, 2019. "Real-time heuristic algorithms for the static weapon target assignment problem," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 377-397, June.
    9. Daniel Selva & Bruce Cameron & Ed Crawley, 2016. "Patterns in System Architecture Decisions," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(6), pages 477-497, November.
    10. Hughes, Michael S. & Lunday, Brian J., 2022. "The Weapon Target Assignment Problem: Rational Inference of Adversary Target Utility Valuations from Observed Solutions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    11. Lu, Yiping & Chen, Danny Z., 2021. "A new exact algorithm for the Weapon-Target Assignment problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    12. Lo, Shirleen Lee Yuen & How, Bing Shen & Leong, Wei Dong & Teng, Sin Yong & Rhamdhani, Muhammad Akbar & Sunarso, Jaka, 2021. "Techno-economic analysis for biomass supply chain: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    13. Anissa Frini & Adel Guitouni & Abderrezak Benaskeur, 2017. "Solving Dynamic Multi-Criteria Resource-Target Allocation Problem Under Uncertainty: A Comparison of Decomposition and Myopic Approaches," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1465-1496, November.
    14. Nicholas T. Boardman & Brian J. Lunday & Matthew J. Robbins, 2017. "Heterogeneous surface-to-air missile defense battery location: a game theoretic approach," Journal of Heuristics, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 417-447, December.
    15. Martijn van Ee, 2020. "On efficient algorithms for finding efficient salvo policies," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(2), pages 147-158, March.
    16. Alexandre Colaers Andersen & Konstantin Pavlikov & Túlio A. M. Toffolo, 2022. "Weapon-target assignment problem: exact and approximate solution algorithms," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 312(2), pages 581-606, May.
    17. Cha, Young-Ho & Kim, Yeong-Dae, 2010. "Fire scheduling for planned artillery attack operations under time-dependent destruction probabilities," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 383-392, October.
    18. Davis, Michael T. & Robbins, Matthew J. & Lunday, Brian J., 2017. "Approximate dynamic programming for missile defense interceptor fire control," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(3), pages 873-886.
    19. Alexander G. Kline & Darryl K. Ahner & Brian J. Lunday, 2020. "A heuristic and metaheuristic approach to the static weapon target assignment problem," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 78(4), pages 791-812, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:19:y:2022:i:1:p:107-121. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.