IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v17y2020i2p137-142.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognition, conflict, and doctrine: How groupthink fails on a Clausewitz landscape

Author

Listed:
  • Rodrick Wallace

Abstract

Real-time conflict takes place on Clausewitz landscapes most notably marked by fog-of-war and frictional limits, uncertainties, and misperceptions. Imposition of such factors on an opponent is, in fact, a standard tactic of confrontation, from courts of law to commerce, from political campaigns to the battlefield. Time-constrained optimization models of institutional effectiveness, based on ‘anytime algorithm’ methods, suggest that the burden of doctrinal groupthink may become synergistic with fog-of-war and friction to greatly compromise the ability of an institution to respond to shadow price demands imposed by a contending agent or environment. A different, and more direct, approach via a ‘simple’ stochastic model, provides similar insight.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodrick Wallace, 2020. "Cognition, conflict, and doctrine: How groupthink fails on a Clausewitz landscape," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 17(2), pages 137-142, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:137-142
    DOI: 10.1177/1548512919843642
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1548512919843642
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1548512919843642?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hanqing Jin & Zuo Quan Xu & Xun Yu Zhou, 2008. "A Convex Stochastic Optimization Problem Arising From Portfolio Selection," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 171-183, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guohui Guan & Zongxia Liang & Yi xia, 2021. "Optimal management of DC pension fund under relative performance ratio and VaR constraint," Papers 2103.04352, arXiv.org.
    2. Bakshi, Gurdip & Madan, Dilip & Panayotov, George, 2010. "Returns of claims on the upside and the viability of U-shaped pricing kernels," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 97(1), pages 130-154, July.
    3. Yan Li & Baimin Yu, 2012. "Portfolio selection of a closed-end mutual fund," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 75(3), pages 245-272, June.
    4. Ying Hu & Hanqing Jin & Xun Yu Zhou, 2020. "Consistent Investment of Sophisticated Rank-Dependent Utility Agents in Continuous Time," Working Papers hal-02624308, HAL.
    5. Jacobovic, Royi & Kella, Offer, 2020. "Minimizing a stochastic convex function subject to stochastic constraints and some applications," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(11), pages 7004-7018.
    6. Guan, Guohui & Liang, Zongxia & Xia, Yi, 2023. "Optimal management of DC pension fund under the relative performance ratio and VaR constraint," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(2), pages 868-886.
    7. Balbás, Alejandro & Balbás, Beatriz & Heras, Antonio, 2009. "Optimal reinsurance with general risk measures," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 374-384, June.
    8. Hui Mi & Zuo Quan Xu & Dongfang Yang, 2023. "Optimal Management of DC Pension Plan with Inflation Risk and Tail VaR Constraint," Papers 2309.01936, arXiv.org.
    9. Zuo Quan Xu, 2014. "A Note on the Quantile Formulation," Papers 1403.7269, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2014.
    10. Xu, Zuo Quan, 2014. "Investment under duality risk measure," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(3), pages 786-793.
    11. Hongcan Lin & David Saunders & Chengguo Weng, 2019. "Portfolio Optimization With Performance Ratios," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 22(05), pages 1-38, August.
    12. Michael Senescall & Rand Kwong Yew Low, 2024. "Quantitative Portfolio Management: Review and Outlook," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-25, September.
    13. Ying Hu & Hanqing Jin & Xun Yu Zhou, 2020. "Consistent Investment of Sophisticated Rank-Dependent Utility Agents in Continuous Time," Papers 2006.01979, arXiv.org.
    14. Fangyuan Zhang, 2023. "Non-concave portfolio optimization with average value-at-risk," Mathematics and Financial Economics, Springer, volume 17, number 3, March.
    15. Rodrick Wallace, 2024. "“Neuroscience†models of institutional conflict under fog, friction, and adversarial intent," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 21(1), pages 75-86, January.
    16. Ying Hu & Hanqing Jin & Xun Yu Zhou, 2021. "Consistent investment of sophisticated rank‐dependent utility agents in continuous time," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 1056-1095, July.
    17. Rodrick Wallace, 2022. "How AI founders on adversarial landscapes of fog and friction," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 19(3), pages 519-538, July.
    18. Zongxia Liang & Yang Liu & Litian Zhang, 2021. "A Framework of State-dependent Utility Optimization with General Benchmarks," Papers 2101.06675, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    19. Marcos Escobar-Anel & Andreas Lichtenstern & Rudi Zagst, 2020. "Behavioral portfolio insurance strategies," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 34(4), pages 353-399, December.
    20. Yunhong Li & Zuo Quan Xu & Xun Yu Zhou, 2023. "Robust utility maximization with intractable claims," Papers 2304.06938, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2023.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:137-142. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.