IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/joudef/v17y2020i1p5-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Models for restoration decision making for a supply chain network after a cyber attack

Author

Listed:
  • Emily A Heath
  • John E Mitchell
  • Thomas C Sharkey

Abstract

This work considers modeling approaches to the problem of restoration decision making by supply chain managers. Specifically, we consider an oil supply chain network that has suffered a cyber attack. As a result of the attack, critical services to the supply chain are lost, and the manager has uncertain information regarding when these services will be available. We first consider a deterministic model where the supply chain manager has complete information about the restoration of damaged services. We extend this model to a stochastic programming model involving several different recovery scenarios. We present computational results for a realistic case study developed with an extensive literature survey. We compare results of the stochastic model with average deterministic results, and show that the average deterministic results do not produce good solutions for an uncertain setting. We conclude with general remarks on how supply chain managers should consider restoration decisions under uncertainty.

Suggested Citation

  • Emily A Heath & John E Mitchell & Thomas C Sharkey, 2020. "Models for restoration decision making for a supply chain network after a cyber attack," The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, , vol. 17(1), pages 5-19, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:5-19
    DOI: 10.1177/1548512918808410
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1548512918808410
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1548512918808410?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Xiaoping & Batta, Rajan & Kwon, Changhyun, 2017. "Effective and equitable supply of gasoline to impacted areas in the aftermath of a natural disaster," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 25-34.
    2. Nurre, Sarah G. & Cavdaroglu, Burak & Mitchell, John E. & Sharkey, Thomas C. & Wallace, William A., 2012. "Restoring infrastructure systems: An integrated network design and scheduling (INDS) problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 794-806.
    3. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Thomas Magnanti & Joel Sokol & Yi Wang, 2001. "Telecommunication Link Restoration Planning with Multiple Facility Types," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 106(1), pages 127-154, September.
    4. Ni, Ni & Howell, Brendan J. & Sharkey, Thomas C., 2018. "Modeling the impact of unmet demand in supply chain resiliency planning," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-16.
    5. Eric D. Vugrin & Mark A. Turnquist & Nathanael J.K. Brown, 2014. "Optimal recovery sequencing for enhanced resilience and service restoration in transportation networks," International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3/4), pages 218-246.
    6. Anantaram Balakrishnan & Thomas L. Magnanti & Joel S. Sokol & Yi Wang, 2002. "Spare-Capacity Assignment For Line Restoration Using a Single-Facility Type," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 50(4), pages 617-635, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cheung, Kam-Fung & Bell, Michael G.H. & Bhattacharjya, Jyotirmoyee, 2021. "Cybersecurity in logistics and supply chain management: An overview and future research directions," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tianyu Wang & Igor Averbakh, 2022. "Network construction/restoration problems: cycles and complexity," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 51-73, August.
    2. Yogesh Agarwal, 2013. "Design of Survivable Networks Using Three- and Four-Partition Facets," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 199-213, February.
    3. Fang, Yi-Ping & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2019. "Optimum post-disruption restoration under uncertainty for enhancing critical infrastructure resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1-11.
    4. Almoghathawi, Yasser & Barker, Kash & Albert, Laura A., 2019. "Resilience-driven restoration model for interdependent infrastructure networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 12-23.
    5. Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Barker, Kash & Ramirez-Marquez, Jose E., 2016. "A review of definitions and measures of system resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 47-61.
    6. Alkhaleel, Basem A. & Liao, Haitao & Sullivan, Kelly M., 2022. "Risk and resilience-based optimal post-disruption restoration for critical infrastructures under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(1), pages 174-202.
    7. Chao Zhang & Jingjing Kong & Slobodan P Simonovic, 2018. "Modeling joint restoration strategies for interdependent infrastructure systems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, April.
    8. Ghorbani-Renani, Nafiseh & González, Andrés D. & Barker, Kash & Morshedlou, Nazanin, 2020. "Protection-interdiction-restoration: Tri-level optimization for enhancing interdependent network resilience," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    9. Yasser Almoghathawi & Andrés D. González & Kash Barker, 2021. "Exploring Recovery Strategies for Optimal Interdependent Infrastructure Network Resilience," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 229-260, March.
    10. Timothy Matisziw & Alan Murray & Tony Grubesic, 2010. "Strategic Network Restoration," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 10(3), pages 345-361, September.
    11. Milan Janić, 2018. "Modelling the resilience of rail passenger transport networks affected by large-scale disruptive events: the case of HSR (high speed rail)," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1101-1137, July.
    12. Aybike Ulusan & Ozlem Ergun, 2018. "Restoration of services in disrupted infrastructure systems: A network science approach," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(2), pages 1-28, February.
    13. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Maureen S. Golan & Laura H. Jernegan & Igor Linkov, 2020. "Trends and applications of resilience analytics in supply chain modeling: systematic literature review in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 222-243, June.
    15. Poulin, Craig & Kane, Michael B., 2021. "Infrastructure resilience curves: Performance measures and summary metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    16. Ouyang, Min & Liu, Chuang & Xu, Min, 2019. "Value of resilience-based solutions on critical infrastructure protection: Comparing with robustness-based solutions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Camilo Gomez & Andrés D. González & Hiba Baroud & Claudia D. Bedoya‐Motta, 2019. "Integrating Operational and Organizational Aspects in Interdependent Infrastructure Network Recovery," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(9), pages 1913-1929, September.
    18. Xu, Min & Ouyang, Min & Hong, Liu & Mao, Zijun & Xu, Xiaolin, 2022. "Resilience-driven repair sequencing decision under uncertainty for critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    19. Dr Olajire Aremu Odunlade & Prof Festus Folajinmi Adegbie, 2022. "Manufactured Export and Government Spending on Infrastructures in Nigeria (1990 – 2015)," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 6(6), pages 130-134, June.
    20. Ghaneshvar Ramineni & Nafiseh Ghorbani-Renani & Kash Barker & Andrés D. González & Talayeh Razzaghi & Sridhar Radhakrishnan, 2023. "Machine learning approaches to modeling interdependent network restoration time," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 22-35, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:joudef:v:17:y:2020:i:1:p:5-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.